1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TNF: Packers vs Panthers
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:01 pm to tween the hedges
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:01 pm to tween the hedges
Another dumb arse coach going full retard losing the momentum for his team.
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:01 pm to shaqtaw
What a stupid decision
This post was edited on 10/29/26 at 10:02 pm
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:02 pm to ForeverLSU02
I can’t stand this analytic garbage sometimes. Why even go for 2 there? Glad it failed. Moron
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:02 pm to FireGoodell
I'm trying to even understand the analytics on this one.
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:04 pm to SiriusBraveFan
Such an unnecessarily risky move
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:05 pm to Giantkiller
Odds of converting XP ~95%
Odds of converting 2-point ~48% (57% in 2026 so far)
Depends on your offense and personnel and whether you’ve got plays you like but the gist is when you’re down 14, going for 2 twice results in equal or more expected points than trying 2 XP
Whether or not it’s “more risky” is very team and context dependent though
Odds of converting 2-point ~48% (57% in 2026 so far)
Depends on your offense and personnel and whether you’ve got plays you like but the gist is when you’re down 14, going for 2 twice results in equal or more expected points than trying 2 XP
Whether or not it’s “more risky” is very team and context dependent though
This post was edited on 10/29/26 at 10:19 pm
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:08 pm to SiriusBraveFan
quote:if they made it, they'd be driving to win the game now.
I'm trying to even understand the analytics on this one.
That's the risk/reward
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:08 pm to RemouladeSawce
Can’t wait for the panthers to score again and miss the 2 point conversion, when they could easily be tying it with an XP
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:09 pm to RemouladeSawce
The Packers are comprised with the last 2 drives
They quit at Halftime and about to get there arse kicked-
There’s so much wrong with last 2 drives not sure where to start
They quit at Halftime and about to get there arse kicked-
There’s so much wrong with last 2 drives not sure where to start
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:10 pm to FireGoodell
Green Bay refusing to run the ball when you should be running out the clock
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:10 pm to castorinho
quote:
if they made it, they'd be driving to win the game now.
But now they’re driving and need a 2 point to tie it. If they score a TD and miss the 2 then they will look like retards
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:10 pm to FireGoodell
Well the way the Packers are playing the can kick a GW FG because they will run 3 plays and use up less than a minute
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:10 pm to RemouladeSawce
I don’t understand not just taking the point there. I don’t care about the analytics down two TDs. It just seems fricking retarded there at that point. Take the point.
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:12 pm to tigerpimpbot
Lmao, what a garbage 3rd down call. Just throw the damn ball
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:13 pm to FireGoodell
quote:
But now they’re driving and need a 2 point to tie it.
Well, of course. But the odds of getting at least one of the two point conversions before it started, are pretty good.
He asked for the reasoning, and that's the reasoning.
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:13 pm to tigerpimpbot
quote:This is a false premise though. And central to the argument is that it’s not there to be “taken”
Take the point
The league average XP is 94%
The Panthers kicker is 70% this season. Over 2 XP, at that rate his likelihood of hitting both is ~49%. And he’s on the road
You don’t have to “care about the analytics” but it’s not an inherently stupid move
This post was edited on 10/29/26 at 10:24 pm
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:15 pm to castorinho
If they planned on going for the win (by going for two eventually) then I can see just going for it when they did.
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:15 pm to tigerpimpbot
You know how when some teams are overmatched and they are down 7 at the end of the game or overtime and then take their odds going for 2 instead of tying?
It's the same logic. If you make it the first time you "win", if not you get a second chance to "tie". (All assuming you can stop them and score again)
It's the same logic. If you make it the first time you "win", if not you get a second chance to "tie". (All assuming you can stop them and score again)
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:15 pm to RemouladeSawce
Panthers coach making looking Moore look like a genius.
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:16 pm to castorinho
I would rather wait and go for the W
Especially being on the road. Once you start driving the defense and crowd start to get anxious at the possibility of the 2 for the win.
Especially being on the road. Once you start driving the defense and crowd start to get anxious at the possibility of the 2 for the win.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News