- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/31/11 at 10:47 am to GrantTheFan
I tend to agree with pitching, but I'm not going to say it always beats good hitting like some in here. Look at the '75 Reds. They were amazing in hitting.
Posted on 3/31/11 at 10:50 am to GrantTheFan
quote:
great pitching
And it's not even close.
Posted on 3/31/11 at 10:53 am to GrantTheFan
Well I'm the coach... I know how to call a game.... I'll take hitting. Any dumbass can get up there and throw it right down the middle and the hitter will only get a hit 3 out of 10 times... But you do have to throw strikes..... Watch BP... You'd be surprised by how many balls will not be "hits"
Posted on 3/31/11 at 10:53 am to GrantTheFan
Depends. Are we talking mid-90's college baseball, professional wood bat baseball or little league?
Majors - pitching
College - Gorilla Ball
LL - one dominant pitcher can run the league for your team but great youth pitchers are hard to come by so I'd go with hitting.
Majors - pitching
College - Gorilla Ball
LL - one dominant pitcher can run the league for your team but great youth pitchers are hard to come by so I'd go with hitting.
Posted on 3/31/11 at 11:11 am to GrantTheFan
I'll buck the trend - Hitting.
Pitching is only 50% of run prevention. So if my hitters learn to play solid D, I can win. And win a lot. Someone mentioned Rice, so I'll counter with LS friggin' U. We've had fairly pedestrian pitching for an elite program, but we've been able to win due to offense.
Or, if you want a pro example, the Yankees have almost always been a far better hitters than pitchers. That's worked out ok for them. their best pitcher ever is Whitey Ford who is a Hall of Famer, but he's never mentioned as one of the very best ever, nor should he be.
Great pitching beats great hitting? Maybe. But great hitting absolutely destroys good pitching.
Pitching is only 50% of run prevention. So if my hitters learn to play solid D, I can win. And win a lot. Someone mentioned Rice, so I'll counter with LS friggin' U. We've had fairly pedestrian pitching for an elite program, but we've been able to win due to offense.
Or, if you want a pro example, the Yankees have almost always been a far better hitters than pitchers. That's worked out ok for them. their best pitcher ever is Whitey Ford who is a Hall of Famer, but he's never mentioned as one of the very best ever, nor should he be.
Great pitching beats great hitting? Maybe. But great hitting absolutely destroys good pitching.
Posted on 3/31/11 at 11:23 am to Baloo
quote:
Or, if you want a pro example, the Yankees have almost always been a far better hitters than pitchers. That's worked out ok for them. their best pitcher ever is Whitey Ford who is a Hall of Famer, but he's never mentioned as one of the very best ever, nor should he be.
I guess you are not counting Clemens, since he was only with the Yankees for five or six in his career.
Posted on 3/31/11 at 11:24 am to Vicks Kennel Club
Not really. If you only count Yankee production, Ford did far more for the Yankees than Clemens. I also don't consider Wade Boggs a Devil Ray.
Posted on 3/31/11 at 11:41 am to Baloo
No doubt. I was just wondering if you would have included Clemens because of his career resume and the fact that he was a Yankee for 5+ years.
Posted on 3/31/11 at 11:58 am to Baloo
quote:
Great pitching beats great hitting? Maybe. But great hitting absolutely destroys good pitching.
I'll agree, but why make the apples to oranges comparison? What about great pitching vs good hitting? Pitching wins that matchup more times than not.
If a team has great pitching 1-5, which is really rare (even the Phillies don't have that), they are very difficult to beat.
Posted on 3/31/11 at 12:04 pm to Tino
quote:
great pitching always beats out great hitting
yogi berra called a team meeting once and said this
he weakened the case by then turning to his hitters and saying "and vice versa"
Posted on 3/31/11 at 12:05 pm to Baloo
quote:
their best starting pitcher ever is Whitey Ford who is a Hall of Famer,
FIFY
Posted on 3/31/11 at 12:13 pm to medtiger
quote:Of course. If you excel in one phase of the game, you'll be okay. I used great hitting v. good pitching due to all of the people defaulting to choosing pitching over hitting.
If a team has great pitching 1-5, which is really rare (even the Phillies don't have that), they are very difficult to beat.
Posted on 3/31/11 at 12:16 pm to Baloo
quote:
Great pitching beats great hitting? Maybe. But great hitting absolutely destroys good pitching.
excellent take.
what do the other teams have. Because you're not choosing whether or not you're choosing great pitching versus your own great hitting. its where you are in comparison to others.
if no one else has great pitching either, maybe you take great hitting.
Posted on 3/31/11 at 12:22 pm to LSU Fan 90812
I'm not really adding much to the thread but I'll point out a couple obvious things
1) where do you play? coors field a mile into the sky or old dimensions busch stadium next to the mississippi?
because I don't think there are any pitchers who can dominate at coors field... and at the other extreme you could get away with pitchers who make the hitters put the ball in play at Busch
2) how many players of each? One great hitter? Can be near irrelevant at times. One great pitcher might get you three wins in a seven game series.
If we get three great hitters or three great pitchers I still take three great pitchers... if we get 7 of each I might reverse course and take the hitters... you just can't pitch around that many guys
1) where do you play? coors field a mile into the sky or old dimensions busch stadium next to the mississippi?
because I don't think there are any pitchers who can dominate at coors field... and at the other extreme you could get away with pitchers who make the hitters put the ball in play at Busch
2) how many players of each? One great hitter? Can be near irrelevant at times. One great pitcher might get you three wins in a seven game series.
If we get three great hitters or three great pitchers I still take three great pitchers... if we get 7 of each I might reverse course and take the hitters... you just can't pitch around that many guys
Popular
Back to top

0







