Started By
Message

re: Matt Schick ESPN - 95% certain” transfers will soon be allowed to play immediately

Posted on 1/17/18 at 3:38 pm to
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
22422 posts
Posted on 1/17/18 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

It will probably cause some coaches to hate each other when coach a starts recruiting coach b players currently on roster.


Theres absolutely no way that this rule will allow a school to contact a player while he is still officially playing for another school.
Posted by eric4UA08
Member since Nov 2008
2017 posts
Posted on 1/17/18 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

Theres absolutely no way that this rule will allow a school to contact a player while he is still officially playing for another school.


Lol you say that as if it won't still happen.
Posted by rebel of fortune
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2012
3534 posts
Posted on 1/17/18 at 3:47 pm to
It already happens a lot more than you think. Look at Shea Patterson and Michigan for example.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86468 posts
Posted on 1/17/18 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

Are you for or against this?


Against, as any fan of college football should be. I know the concept of the "amateur, student athlete" is ever-eroding and all but gone but opening up a free agency is just way out of line. You commit to a school, period. Not a position coach, or a position, or a slot on the depth chart...you commit to play football at that university. If you haven't cracked the starting lineup by year 2 that is in no way a justifiable reason to call it quits and go somewhere else. The only time I'd be in favor of this is in a situation where an entire coaching staff is let go, or the school is hit with sanctions/probation. But I'm pretty sure there are rules in place currently that allow unfettered transfer during this situation anyway.

When we start allowing kids to transfer all the time anytime they're unhappy or get cussed out in practice, and they're getting paid as well, well...the college football we grew up with will all be over. I mean at that point what would separate it from the NFL aside from the fact they also have to go to class?
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82024 posts
Posted on 1/17/18 at 3:48 pm to
It's gonna be all fun and games until Saban does it and people melt
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82024 posts
Posted on 1/17/18 at 3:49 pm to
The smaller teams won't be able to keep the two star players that turn into beasts by their junior year
Posted by SwaggerCopter
H TINE HOL IT DINE
Member since Dec 2012
27230 posts
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:00 pm to
I think the ramifications of this will be horrible. College football will be more mercenary than any pro sport. At least pro sports have contracts.
Posted by The Rodfather
I'm not really sure?
Member since Nov 2008
3941 posts
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:03 pm to
The scholarships are essentially only a year by year thing. They only ways I would be good with it (and there is a lot more little things that would have to happen, but)

1) if the scholarship is pulled (or doesn’t keep the grades the school requires), the student should have fully unrestricted ability to go to another school and play immediately

2) the athlete cannot go to a school in the same conference

3) the school is closer to the students original home town, or was a school that he had an offer for out of high school
Posted by Dubosed
Gulf Breeze
Member since Nov 2012
7045 posts
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:05 pm to
This is going to be a shite show
Posted by SoFunnyItsNot
Member since Mar 2013
4623 posts
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:07 pm to
this will ruin the sport.. Recruiting active players on other teams
Posted by beauchristopher
new orleans
Member since Jan 2008
65919 posts
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:10 pm to
I don’t like it

What about players who got kicked out

Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
66925 posts
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:17 pm to
They are loosening the transfer rules on these kids in order to kick the pay for play issue down the road.
This post was edited on 1/17/18 at 4:18 pm
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
21893 posts
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

Are you for or against this?

Against

Against. I'll turn lower caliber programs into basically a minor league system for the big boys. The top programs would basically turn their attention in high school recruiting to strictly going after 4-5 star players who would be ready for immediate playing time and fill the rest of their roster spots with transfers. G5 conferences would lose a lot of their best players to transfers and basically turn into a minor league program for the elite programs from P5 conferences.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76518 posts
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:42 pm to
Y'all realize the overwhelming majority of NCAA sanctioned sports allow this right?
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84856 posts
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

Not a fan. Unless it benefits lsu



With our luck, Brennan or Narcisse will be a stud next year, then transfer to USCw.
This post was edited on 1/17/18 at 4:49 pm
Posted by FairhopeTider
Fairhope, Alabama
Member since May 2012
20762 posts
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:47 pm to
This would be awful. This is one of those lazy narratives that sounds good on the surface but would open up more problems for the sport if implicated.
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
21893 posts
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

Y'all realize the overwhelming majority of NCAA sanctioned sports allow this right?


Because transferring without having to sit out a year just to go to a more elite team isn't abused in lacrosse or swimming like it would be in football or basketball.
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158758 posts
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:53 pm to
The SEC has already come out and said no in conference transfers......





Unless it’s to Bama
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95129 posts
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:54 pm to
It will be a shite show

I played tennis at lsu. Tennis allows this already (coaches can block a handful of schools-in conference and rivals mainly).

What happens a shite ton, is if a coach finds a diamond in the rough recruit at a smaller school, he ends up at UGA, USC, UVA, or another power house the next year and can play immediately


This post was edited on 1/17/18 at 4:56 pm
Posted by BaylorTiger
Member since Nov 2006
2083 posts
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

Y'all realize the overwhelming majority of NCAA sanctioned sports allow this right?


Which ones? Badmiton? Women's Gymnastics? How many of those sports are individual competition sports?

NONE of the major sports, and this is what people are talking about here, allow that.

But to stick to your point with out diving in any deeper...why would that rule be in place for some sports and not others? Why are the sports that do have that rule they way they are?

Further points of discussion...take all of the college coaches in the NCAA...what percentage left their college for other jobs? less than 1%? We need to change the rules to something that can be so clearly chaotic and detrimental for less than 1% of something?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram