- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Matt Schick ESPN - 95% certain” transfers will soon be allowed to play immediately
Posted on 1/17/18 at 3:38 pm to rebel of fortune
Posted on 1/17/18 at 3:38 pm to rebel of fortune
quote:
It will probably cause some coaches to hate each other when coach a starts recruiting coach b players currently on roster.
Theres absolutely no way that this rule will allow a school to contact a player while he is still officially playing for another school.
Posted on 1/17/18 at 3:43 pm to Hester Carries
quote:
Theres absolutely no way that this rule will allow a school to contact a player while he is still officially playing for another school.
Lol you say that as if it won't still happen.
Posted on 1/17/18 at 3:47 pm to Hester Carries
It already happens a lot more than you think. Look at Shea Patterson and Michigan for example.
Posted on 1/17/18 at 3:47 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
Are you for or against this?
Against, as any fan of college football should be. I know the concept of the "amateur, student athlete" is ever-eroding and all but gone but opening up a free agency is just way out of line. You commit to a school, period. Not a position coach, or a position, or a slot on the depth chart...you commit to play football at that university. If you haven't cracked the starting lineup by year 2 that is in no way a justifiable reason to call it quits and go somewhere else. The only time I'd be in favor of this is in a situation where an entire coaching staff is let go, or the school is hit with sanctions/probation. But I'm pretty sure there are rules in place currently that allow unfettered transfer during this situation anyway.
When we start allowing kids to transfer all the time anytime they're unhappy or get cussed out in practice, and they're getting paid as well, well...the college football we grew up with will all be over. I mean at that point what would separate it from the NFL aside from the fact they also have to go to class?
Posted on 1/17/18 at 3:48 pm to RLDSC FAN
It's gonna be all fun and games until Saban does it and people melt
Posted on 1/17/18 at 3:49 pm to castorinho
The smaller teams won't be able to keep the two star players that turn into beasts by their junior year
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:00 pm to castorinho
I think the ramifications of this will be horrible. College football will be more mercenary than any pro sport. At least pro sports have contracts.
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:03 pm to RLDSC FAN
The scholarships are essentially only a year by year thing. They only ways I would be good with it (and there is a lot more little things that would have to happen, but)
1) if the scholarship is pulled (or doesn’t keep the grades the school requires), the student should have fully unrestricted ability to go to another school and play immediately
2) the athlete cannot go to a school in the same conference
3) the school is closer to the students original home town, or was a school that he had an offer for out of high school
1) if the scholarship is pulled (or doesn’t keep the grades the school requires), the student should have fully unrestricted ability to go to another school and play immediately
2) the athlete cannot go to a school in the same conference
3) the school is closer to the students original home town, or was a school that he had an offer for out of high school
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:05 pm to RLDSC FAN
This is going to be a shite show
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:07 pm to Dubosed
this will ruin the sport.. Recruiting active players on other teams
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:10 pm to SoFunnyItsNot
I don’t like it
What about players who got kicked out
What about players who got kicked out
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:17 pm to RLDSC FAN
They are loosening the transfer rules on these kids in order to kick the pay for play issue down the road.
This post was edited on 1/17/18 at 4:18 pm
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:22 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
Are you for or against this?
Against
Against. I'll turn lower caliber programs into basically a minor league system for the big boys. The top programs would basically turn their attention in high school recruiting to strictly going after 4-5 star players who would be ready for immediate playing time and fill the rest of their roster spots with transfers. G5 conferences would lose a lot of their best players to transfers and basically turn into a minor league program for the elite programs from P5 conferences.
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:42 pm to Tiger Prawn
Y'all realize the overwhelming majority of NCAA sanctioned sports allow this right?
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:46 pm to Walt OReilly
quote:
Not a fan. Unless it benefits lsu
With our luck, Brennan or Narcisse will be a stud next year, then transfer to USCw.
This post was edited on 1/17/18 at 4:49 pm
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:47 pm to RLDSC FAN
This would be awful. This is one of those lazy narratives that sounds good on the surface but would open up more problems for the sport if implicated.
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:53 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Y'all realize the overwhelming majority of NCAA sanctioned sports allow this right?
Because transferring without having to sit out a year just to go to a more elite team isn't abused in lacrosse or swimming like it would be in football or basketball.
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:53 pm to RLDSC FAN
The SEC has already come out and said no in conference transfers......
Unless it’s to Bama
Unless it’s to Bama
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:54 pm to RLDSC FAN
It will be a shite show
I played tennis at lsu. Tennis allows this already (coaches can block a handful of schools-in conference and rivals mainly).
What happens a shite ton, is if a coach finds a diamond in the rough recruit at a smaller school, he ends up at UGA, USC, UVA, or another power house the next year and can play immediately
I played tennis at lsu. Tennis allows this already (coaches can block a handful of schools-in conference and rivals mainly).
What happens a shite ton, is if a coach finds a diamond in the rough recruit at a smaller school, he ends up at UGA, USC, UVA, or another power house the next year and can play immediately
This post was edited on 1/17/18 at 4:56 pm
Posted on 1/17/18 at 4:55 pm to FairhopeTider
quote:
Y'all realize the overwhelming majority of NCAA sanctioned sports allow this right?
Which ones? Badmiton? Women's Gymnastics? How many of those sports are individual competition sports?
NONE of the major sports, and this is what people are talking about here, allow that.
But to stick to your point with out diving in any deeper...why would that rule be in place for some sports and not others? Why are the sports that do have that rule they way they are?
Further points of discussion...take all of the college coaches in the NCAA...what percentage left their college for other jobs? less than 1%? We need to change the rules to something that can be so clearly chaotic and detrimental for less than 1% of something?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News