- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Joe Frazier vs Mike Tyson (Who would win?)
Posted on 2/16/11 at 8:38 pm to Roaad
Posted on 2/16/11 at 8:38 pm to Roaad
You've lost some credibility here IMO. In his prime foreman would have beat him like a child. If Foreman had continued to fight after the Ali mistake he could have been the greatest of all-time.
Spinks and Razor!!
Spinks and Razor!!
This post was edited on 2/16/11 at 8:40 pm
Posted on 2/16/11 at 8:43 pm to bomber77
quote:Foreman was great for his day.
In his prime foreman would have beat him like a child.
I think Foreman was built to beat guys like Frazier and Lennox Lewis-types.
I think a great inside fighter takes him.
Posted on 2/16/11 at 8:45 pm to bomber77
quote:Had a great resume.
Spinks
quote:Was considered the most dangerous fighter alive in his day.
Razor
#2 contender.
Holyfield was terrified of him.
Hell, Tyson even backed out once. . .he was supposed to fight Razor, but fought Buster Douglas instead.
oops.
This post was edited on 2/16/11 at 8:47 pm
Posted on 2/16/11 at 8:46 pm to Roaad
I'll leave you with your Tyson is the GOAT opinion.
Frazier and Lewis are not even similar fighters

Frazier and Lewis are not even similar fighters
Posted on 2/16/11 at 8:50 pm to bomber77
quote:
Frazier and Lewis are not even similar fighters
Oh for frick's sake.
Of course they aren't.
I was saying they are the kinds of fighters that Foreman seemed built to take.
quote:As a whole, Tyson was not the GOAT. . .not even the top 50
I'll leave you with your Tyson is the GOAT opinion.
But the Tyson that beat Spinks could beat anyone.
Posted on 2/16/11 at 9:41 pm to Roaad
quote:
Tyson was smaller than everyone he fought.
The problem is that Tyson fought a bunch of bums. Take another look at those opponents...weak and made for sensational knockouts. The heavies were terrible at that point.
Frasier wins this match up 6 out of 10 times. Frasier was mentally tougher and didn't get rattled as easily as Tyson. Frasier had far stiffer competition readying him for a fight with Tyson.
Ali v Tyson? Ali would win 8/10. When an opponent came in unafraid of Tyson and leaned on him, playing the role of bully, Tyson was flummoxed. Ali was as fast if not faster than tyson. Tyson would have trouble getting inside Ali's reach and would end up frustrated and one dimensional. The mental edge which can't be overrated clearly goes to Ali.
Posted on 2/16/11 at 9:43 pm to Roaad
Spinks was a lightheavy weight and was scared of Tyson, I literaly was waiting for him to piss during the stare down. Foreman had one of the deadliest jabs around other than Ali's. Tyson could not bull rush and get inside of someone with a killer Jab he never did except for a old arse Larry Holmes.
This post was edited on 2/16/11 at 9:46 pm
Posted on 2/16/11 at 9:47 pm to TigerFanNKaty
quote:He would take hits, but Foreman wasn't quick enough to escape.
Tyson could not bull rush and get inside of someone with a killer Jab
If George fails to floor him in the first flurry. . .Tyson is inside.
Posted on 2/17/11 at 10:47 am to bomber77
1. Someone wrote Frazier never fought anyone close to Tyson? Really? Ever heard of George Foreman? Foreman was a killer in the 70's and I seriously doubt Tyson could've handled Foreman's best shots.
2. Tyson couldn't handle a good OFFENSIVE jab. The kind that Holmes and Ali used with deadly accuracy. The jab is a lost art but when it works, it can really frustrate the opponent. Watch the Douglas and Holyfield fights. They jabbed him like crazy and he was clueless on what to do. Yeah yeah yeah, Rooney and Cus were gone but at that point in his career, he should've known by then how to handle a jab. Ali did.
3. Tyson fought no one. Spinks was a light heavyweight who beat an over the hill Larry Holmes. The Holmes of Ken Norton days would've knocked him out. The real key no one has mentioned is look at the opponents of Ali and Tyson AFTER they got beat by Ali or Tyson. Several of Ali's still won championships or competed at a very high level. Tyson's? usually went downhill after that and never were serious contenders again.
4. Ali would've made a fool out of Tyson. When that fight started, Ali would've already had his style broken down and sparring partners that fought like him. You do realize he had people like Larry Holmes for sparring partners, right?
He would've made Tyson so mad BEFORE the fight, Tyson would've done nothing but trained to KILL Ali, then Ali would've wore him out, remember 15 round fight, then he would've made a fool out of him before he knocked him out. People forget how well Ali could take a punch or dish out punishment. He was not strictly a finesse fighter, he was fast, but could knock your arse out. His hand speed was definitely faster and probably had better footwork. If he could handle dead-on shots by Foreman, he could handle anything Tyson threw at him.
5. There are several fighters who would've beaten Tyson. Foreman would've killed him. Watch the Frazier and Norton fights. He would've destroyed Tyson and Tyson would've had a problem with someone that size. All George would've done is push him off and then club him on the way out.
Holmes? Tyson probably couldn't have handled that jab and Larry damn sure could take punches. Frazier? tossup. Similar styles and joe was a gamer. They could've knocked each other out. Norton would've beaten Tyson. Joe Louis? HA!!! Kicked Tyson's arse. Tyson never fought someone of that caliber. Watch the Baer Louis fight. Took Baers best stuff for the first round then kicked his arse.
Tyson may have looked great, but he never fought anyone that was in his prime at the top of his game that would've ranked in the top 15 heavyweights of all time and sorry, I don't include Evander in that list Not one of those guys would've been intimidated by Tyson either. Also keep in mind the 15 round change to 12 changed things as well. All these guys could and did go 15 rounds on a regular basis.
2. Tyson couldn't handle a good OFFENSIVE jab. The kind that Holmes and Ali used with deadly accuracy. The jab is a lost art but when it works, it can really frustrate the opponent. Watch the Douglas and Holyfield fights. They jabbed him like crazy and he was clueless on what to do. Yeah yeah yeah, Rooney and Cus were gone but at that point in his career, he should've known by then how to handle a jab. Ali did.
3. Tyson fought no one. Spinks was a light heavyweight who beat an over the hill Larry Holmes. The Holmes of Ken Norton days would've knocked him out. The real key no one has mentioned is look at the opponents of Ali and Tyson AFTER they got beat by Ali or Tyson. Several of Ali's still won championships or competed at a very high level. Tyson's? usually went downhill after that and never were serious contenders again.
4. Ali would've made a fool out of Tyson. When that fight started, Ali would've already had his style broken down and sparring partners that fought like him. You do realize he had people like Larry Holmes for sparring partners, right?
He would've made Tyson so mad BEFORE the fight, Tyson would've done nothing but trained to KILL Ali, then Ali would've wore him out, remember 15 round fight, then he would've made a fool out of him before he knocked him out. People forget how well Ali could take a punch or dish out punishment. He was not strictly a finesse fighter, he was fast, but could knock your arse out. His hand speed was definitely faster and probably had better footwork. If he could handle dead-on shots by Foreman, he could handle anything Tyson threw at him.
5. There are several fighters who would've beaten Tyson. Foreman would've killed him. Watch the Frazier and Norton fights. He would've destroyed Tyson and Tyson would've had a problem with someone that size. All George would've done is push him off and then club him on the way out.
Holmes? Tyson probably couldn't have handled that jab and Larry damn sure could take punches. Frazier? tossup. Similar styles and joe was a gamer. They could've knocked each other out. Norton would've beaten Tyson. Joe Louis? HA!!! Kicked Tyson's arse. Tyson never fought someone of that caliber. Watch the Baer Louis fight. Took Baers best stuff for the first round then kicked his arse.
Tyson may have looked great, but he never fought anyone that was in his prime at the top of his game that would've ranked in the top 15 heavyweights of all time and sorry, I don't include Evander in that list Not one of those guys would've been intimidated by Tyson either. Also keep in mind the 15 round change to 12 changed things as well. All these guys could and did go 15 rounds on a regular basis.
This post was edited on 2/17/11 at 10:48 am
Posted on 2/17/11 at 10:57 am to prplhze2000
quote:Foreman was a completely different fighter than Tyson.
Frazier never fought anyone close to Tyson? Really? Ever heard of George Foreman?
Posted on 2/17/11 at 11:01 am to Roaad
quote:
If George fails to floor him in the first flurry. . .Tyson is inside.
You say this as if he remains inside the whole fight.
There is this thing called a clinch. Jab, jab, inside fighting, clinch, break.
It's not as if Foreman is going to have one chance at this or even Tyson in return.
Posted on 2/17/11 at 11:06 am to Circle the Wagons
If Foreman fought a smart fight he would have whipped Tyson IMO - just because a great power puncher with a superior jab and reach has an advantage... but there's really no guarantee that a Foreman in his prime fighting a Tyson in his prime chooses to fight a smart fight... if it had just been a slugfest Foreman/Tyson might have been a pickem
Posted on 2/17/11 at 11:10 am to prplhze2000
quote:Very solid post. I agree with everything except that I don't think Frazier-Tyson would be a tossup. I think Frazier definitely wins.
prplhze2000
quote:I LOVE that you referenced this fight. Baer is one of my favorite fighters and he was a good comparison to Tyson. Dude was an absolute mauler and for Louis, I think that fight was his masterpiece. Everyone focuses on the Schmeling fights and they should because of their historical significance but the Baer fight was such a beautiful dominant performance.
Watch the Baer Louis fight. Took Baers best stuff for the first round then kicked his arse.
Posted on 2/17/11 at 11:23 am to molsusports
Good point mol. Foreman in his prime had a tendacy to forget about his jab and just throw hay makers. That is what lost him the fight to Ali.
Posted on 2/17/11 at 11:39 am to Jamohn
quote:
Baer Louis fight
the right hand to end it
Posted on 2/17/11 at 11:40 am to TigerFanNKaty
People forget Ali would not give Foreman a rematch. he knew it wouldn't work twice.
Foreman would've just pushed off tyson then clubbed him.
Now, read that interview with Ali posted earlier and then watch that interview where he says BEFORE the Foreman fight how he will beat him and totally dismisses his power Same thing for Tyson.
Roaad, Foreman destroyed much better heavyweights than those Tyson fought just as quickly if not sooner. Watch the Holyfield Foreman fight. There is one round where Holyfield throws EVERYTHING he can at a fricking 50 year old George Foreman and could NOT knock him out, Holyfield's face changed when he realized he couldnl't do it. Yeah, you're right, Frazier didn't fight anyone like Tyson. Just better guys like Ali and Foreman.
Foreman would've just pushed off tyson then clubbed him.
Now, read that interview with Ali posted earlier and then watch that interview where he says BEFORE the Foreman fight how he will beat him and totally dismisses his power Same thing for Tyson.
Roaad, Foreman destroyed much better heavyweights than those Tyson fought just as quickly if not sooner. Watch the Holyfield Foreman fight. There is one round where Holyfield throws EVERYTHING he can at a fricking 50 year old George Foreman and could NOT knock him out, Holyfield's face changed when he realized he couldnl't do it. Yeah, you're right, Frazier didn't fight anyone like Tyson. Just better guys like Ali and Foreman.
Posted on 2/17/11 at 11:53 am to prplhze2000
I know im late to the thread but...
I used to be the "Tyson could beat anybody in his prime" guy.
But after looking back on his career a little bit and watching multiple documentary's on a lot of these guys, i'd take Frazier over Tyson all day.
Tyson peak was sick. No doubt. But in the biggest fights of his life he always underpreformed and he always underprepared. I dont even think we know what Tysons potential could have been if he wasnt a head case. But, you have to judge him on what you know, that he never really beat anybody spectacular and consistently underpreformed. I dont know how you could justify having him beating Frazier.
I used to be the "Tyson could beat anybody in his prime" guy.
But after looking back on his career a little bit and watching multiple documentary's on a lot of these guys, i'd take Frazier over Tyson all day.
Tyson peak was sick. No doubt. But in the biggest fights of his life he always underpreformed and he always underprepared. I dont even think we know what Tysons potential could have been if he wasnt a head case. But, you have to judge him on what you know, that he never really beat anybody spectacular and consistently underpreformed. I dont know how you could justify having him beating Frazier.
Posted on 2/17/11 at 11:54 am to prplhze2000
quote:
Roaad, Foreman destroyed much better heavyweights than those Tyson fought just as quickly if not sooner. Watch the Holyfield Foreman fight. There is one round where Holyfield throws EVERYTHING he can at a fricking 50 year old George Foreman and could NOT knock him out, Holyfield's face changed when he realized he couldnl't do it. Yeah, you're right, Frazier didn't fight anyone like Tyson. Just better guys like Ali and Foreman.
Never compare Tysons resume vs Foremans.
Apples and oranges
Posted on 2/17/11 at 11:57 am to prplhze2000
quote:Foreman was ahead of his time.
Roaad, Foreman destroyed much better heavyweights than those Tyson fought just as quickly if not sooner.
I think pre-mental Tyson would have done the same to those same heavyweights.
quote:I was never a big fan of Holyfield.
There is one round where Holyfield throws EVERYTHING he can at a fricking 50 year old George Foreman and could NOT knock him out
I think had Tyson fought Evander before prison, as was scheduled, Evander would have been a boxing footnote.
Posted on 2/17/11 at 12:03 pm to Roaad
yeah right.
Tyson would've destroyed Ken Norton in one round?
Not happening.
Tyson would've destroyed Ken Norton in one round?
Not happening.
Back to top


3






