- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Dianna Russini was making 800k a year at the NYT
Posted on 6/24/26 at 11:54 am
Posted on 6/24/26 at 11:54 am
This info started going around today, lots of articles talking about it, people are all flabbergasted because that would have made her one of the highest paid employees in the entire company of 6,000 people. I'd love to hear what her ex-coworkers are saying right about now.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 11:56 am to StansberryRules
quote:
. I'd love to hear what her ex-coworkers are saying right about now.
well those are the bitches that were leaking the info. snakes eating snakes.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 11:59 am to StansberryRules
Not sure why that number shocks people when you see the contracts ESPN is dishing out to their newsbreakers like Schefter, Woj, Shams, etc.
Russini was the #2 behind Schefter at ESPN at the time she left for the Athletic.
Russini was the #2 behind Schefter at ESPN at the time she left for the Athletic.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 12:02 pm to Broski
In terms of making money, was she actually worth that much in additional revenue?
The only sane reason you'd pay someone 800k is if you genuinely thought they were going to generate more than that in additional profit.
Are people really subscribing to the Athletic in droves because of this one particular tart?
The only sane reason you'd pay someone 800k is if you genuinely thought they were going to generate more than that in additional profit.
Are people really subscribing to the Athletic in droves because of this one particular tart?
Posted on 6/24/26 at 12:04 pm to StansberryRules
quote:
In terms of making money, was she actually worth that much in additional revenue?
The only sane reason you'd pay someone 800k is if you genuinely thought they were going to generate more than that in additional profit.
Are people really subscribing to the Athletic in droves because of this one particular tart?
I have no idea, but my point is that they paid to pull her away from ESPN.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 12:09 pm to Broski
All of these newsbreaking positions are dumb.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 12:23 pm to nola tiger lsu
quote:
All of these newsbreaking positions are dumb.
The practice is definitely dumb because they are all just mouthpieces for the teams they are breaking news on.
Unfortunately, the public at large eats their shite up which is why they are getting the money that they do.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 12:35 pm to Broski
quote:
Unfortunately, the public at large eats their shite up which is why they are getting the money that they do.
Yea I really dont understand why or the value. Youll find out eventually anyways.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 12:43 pm to nola tiger lsu
quote:
Yea I really dont understand why or the value.
It's the allure of feeling like you're on the inside, which is complete and utter bullshite.
It's why I question that sanity of people who pay for recruiting subscriptions. None of those people are actually uncovering anything on their own, rather they are just telling the story that they are being fed by the school and/or recruit to control the narrative.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 12:52 pm to StansberryRules
maybe she was fricking whoever signed her also.
Popular
Back to top
3






