Started By
Message

re: Could the NFL field a competitive all-white team?

Posted on 4/8/13 at 5:31 pm to
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
33190 posts
Posted on 4/8/13 at 5:31 pm to
wow youhad that list ready
Posted by ClientNumber9
Member since Feb 2009
10103 posts
Posted on 4/8/13 at 5:34 pm to
Tiger, this is a good assessment, and I agree.

QB: Stacked
OL: Stacked
RB: Hillis, Woodhead and Gerhart would be serviceable
WRs: Hartline, Decker, Welker
TE: Gronkowski and Jason Witten

Defense would be ok provided they could get to the QB quickly. That secondary would get eaten up with more than 5 seconds to throw the ball.
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
19352 posts
Posted on 4/8/13 at 5:37 pm to
quote:

Youre not winning any game by 50 with Eric Smith as your starting safety


ok replace him with Danny McCray or Steve Gregory who cares they are far superior in every other way they wouldn't have to make any big plays

Peyton best QB in the NFL
Welker/Nelson Top 5 WR duo in the NFL
Best TE duo in the history of football
Best OL in the history of football
Best DL in the NFL
2nd best LB core in the NFL(after 49ers)
Any 2 of Smith/Conte/Weddle would be a top 5 safety duo

They would win every game by 50
This post was edited on 4/8/13 at 5:39 pm
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116161 posts
Posted on 4/8/13 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

Danny McCray


Honkie got a tan


Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290804 posts
Posted on 4/8/13 at 5:39 pm to
CB would be the only glaring weakness
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
19352 posts
Posted on 4/8/13 at 5:39 pm to
ok Tom Zibikowski then
This post was edited on 4/8/13 at 5:40 pm
Posted by JBeam
Guns,Germs & Steel
Member since Jan 2011
68377 posts
Posted on 4/8/13 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

CB would be the only glaring weakness

along with tailback being average at best.

Hillis was a flash in the pan and Gerhart would be the best dude in the backfield.
This post was edited on 4/8/13 at 5:42 pm
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
33190 posts
Posted on 4/8/13 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

along with tailback being average at best.

Yea but your O-line would make up for that
Posted by Tigerfan56
Member since May 2010
10526 posts
Posted on 4/8/13 at 5:43 pm to
You don't need a great RB with that oline and QB
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
33190 posts
Posted on 4/8/13 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

Danny McCray

Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290804 posts
Posted on 4/8/13 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

along with tailback being average at best.

Hillis was a flash in the pan and Gerhart would be the best dude in the backfield.



wouldnt be a weakness per se.


one of the weakest spots on a strong team. But its not like CB where you basically dont have anyone worthwhile at all.

at RB at least you have Hills, Gerhart, Woodhead who havce all enjoyed some type of success in the NFL
Posted by MetArl15
Washington, DC
Member since Apr 2007
13538 posts
Posted on 4/8/13 at 5:49 pm to
I think you put Riley Cooper and Welker as your two wideouts and move Decker and Nelson to CB. Maybe you move Cooper instead of Nelson, but either way, you have to move some WRs over to make up for the potential travesty you'd have at CB.
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31255 posts
Posted on 4/8/13 at 5:50 pm to
Verlander actually had the best answer in the thread. Winning by 50 is a stretch but they are prohibitive Super Bowl favorites. Absolutely loaded offense. Easily the best in re nfl. Stacked at every position but rb. It would not matter though with your choice of qb, an all pro oline, great wr, and stud tight ends.

Defense would also be good as shite. Jared Allen, Justin smith, clay Mathews,. And JJ watt would rape opposing qbs. The secondary is the only weakness. Harrison smith is good, but they may need Jason sehorn to make a comeback haha.

Not to mention, they have belichick, Sean Payton, the Harbaugh brothers, etc on the coaching staff. Also, they have a choice of kickers and punters at their disposal. They would give the 2007 pats a run for their money, and I think they would win.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116161 posts
Posted on 4/8/13 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

They would give the 2007 pats a run for their money, and I think they would win.


Moss would catch 825489264580728025 TDs that game
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31255 posts
Posted on 4/8/13 at 5:56 pm to
Tom Brady could play for both teams and the whites would have gronk. Moss and the corners are literally your only advantage. The whites have your qb (although I would start Peyton) and your coach. There would be fifteen all pro quality players.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84434 posts
Posted on 4/8/13 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

We're talking straight up Caucasian folks here.


What exactly does this mean?
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116161 posts
Posted on 4/8/13 at 6:00 pm to
Still dont think youre scoring more than Moss's 825489264580728025 TDs
Posted by AllBamaDoesIsWin
Member since Dec 2011
26725 posts
Posted on 4/8/13 at 6:02 pm to
An all white offense could work with the likes of Gronk, Brady or Rodgers, Welker, Joe Thomas, Evan Mathis, etc. On defense...uhh...Paul Kruger, JJ Watt...and that might be it.
Posted by BayouFann
CenLa
Member since Jun 2012
7192 posts
Posted on 4/8/13 at 6:03 pm to
cb's, rb's and wr's will be weak links?
Posted by CarolinaSoCocky
Darkside of the Moon
Member since Dec 2012
1157 posts
Posted on 4/8/13 at 6:07 pm to
Are you talking a white all-star team vs black all-star team? If so JaMarcus Russell can qb that team and they'll still win by 35
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram