re: ADs threaten to "freeze out" ND on future schedules due to playoff favoritism

quote:

---

If only it were truly equal and certain teams didn't get blatant favoritism in several ways, but sure Bama is an example of a giant willing to sacrifice fully for fairness to the peons.

---

Whatever gripes y'all might have about the REC putting in work are pretty minor in comparison to how the big dogs treat the smaller ones in most conferences.

1) Wolken overall is not very credible when it comes to ND, if you know some of his background. Obviously, he probably talked to some ADs that probably will choose to avoid ND. But there are over 130 in FBS and you only need to schedule 12 games. The article is click-baity in general.

2) All the conferences agreed to the MOU a year ago. It is being treated as if this: a) was not previously unanimously agreed upon; and b) is a direct response to Sunday. Neither of those are true.

3) Relatedly, the MOU is now irrelevant. The committee moved Bama ahead of ND after beating 5-7 Auburn by 7, and didn’t move Bama down after losing by 21 to UGA. Had UVA beaten Duke, the committee likely would’ve kept ND in (probably at 9, with Bama at 10) but the ACC needed a team so Miami moved ahead. Point being: The committee will manipulate things as necessary, and if ND is #11 or 12, the committee will just move ND to #13 to get #10 in, if needed. (I think when Bevacqua agreed to it, he didn’t see something like that happening. Now it’s obvious that would happen, so he should back out of the MOU, in my opinion.)

4) In general, the conferences don’t want ND to join a conference unless it’s theirs. This is why, at a conference level, you won’t see a conference prohibit teams from scheduling ND. Again, a minority of athletic directors might choose not to.

quote:

---

Relatedly, the MOU is now irrelevant.

---

It was already irrelevant because the committee still hasn’t decided on the “rules” of the playoff next season. It was never an “official” thing. The committee has until January 23rd to decide on the new rules, and I doubt that the ND auto-qualification thing will be part of the official rules.

they still have the boomers, as dwindling as it gets, they still do have them left

quote:

---

I’ve said this a million times before and I’ll say it again: Notre Dame is the definition of an elitist school with an elitist fanbase. They are, in every way, as bad if not worst than Harvard when it comes to classism/elitism.

---

From Notre Dame:

The University of Notre Dame's student aid philosophy centers on providing a Catholic, values-based education to all deserving students, meeting 100% of demonstrated financial need for undergraduates through grants and scholarships (not loans) via its Pathways to Notre Dame program, ensuring affordability regardless of background, and[ maintaining a need-blind policy for all applicants, including internationals, to focus on merit and potential, not money.

On Notre Dame's webpage they note that 70% of undergraduates receive some form of financial aid with $64,200 being the median need-based scholarship awarded to incoming first-year students. In other words, if you can get admitted you will be able to afford Notre Dame.

Notre Dame is able to do this because it has a very high endowment of $16.62 billion and a total Undergraduate enrollment of only 8,800 students. Admission to Notre Dame is Highly Selective and applicants require high test scores, high achievement in High School and involvement in extra-curricular activities are important (student government, involvement in sports, volunteer activities, etc.).

If that makes Notre Dame "Elitist", well so be it.........