Started By
Message

re: 2022 Formula 1 Season Thread

Posted on 4/5/22 at 3:54 pm to
Posted by Captain Crackysack
Member since Oct 2017
2231 posts
Posted on 4/5/22 at 3:54 pm to
And then still end up losing his seat to Gasly for the 2023 season
Posted by Jor Jor The Dinosaur
Chicago, IL
Member since Nov 2014
7445 posts
Posted on 4/5/22 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

I'd bet he's perfectly ok with that.
Absolutely, he knows his role and executes it admirably.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
78304 posts
Posted on 4/5/22 at 8:17 pm to
Perez would be ok with them sabotaging his races just so Max doesn't have to win it on the track?
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 4/5/22 at 8:41 pm to
He better be because that is exactly what will happen in the rare instance he finds him self in front of Max. He knew going in he was #2 on that team.

Perez is not fast. Has never been fast. Knows he isn't fast.

Posted by hikingfan
Member since Jun 2013
1757 posts
Posted on 4/5/22 at 9:09 pm to
Just for giggles - since the names of these drivers have come up recently in this thread - which of these drivers in their peak beats 2021/22 Max in an equal car over a full season (assuming the car is a front runner and in contention to win both the WDC and WCC):

1) Senna
2) Schumacher
3) Hamilton
4) Gilles Villeneuve
5) Kimi
6) Vettel
7) Prost
8) Hakkinen
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 4/5/22 at 9:26 pm to
The comparison I would like to see is Ham or Max in an exact reproduction of one of Fangio's cars, or Jim Clark's, and see if they could match his time.


Of course that could never happen for a variety of reasons. The main one being neither would go balls out in a car like that as it would be too dangerous for them.

Other than Bianchi's death, which was a freak accident and totally avoidable, their hasn't been a death in F1 since 1994 and they still scream about safety and changing layouts to make them safer. Today's drivers are far too soft and coddled to drive an old school car at the limit.

eta- Dude having a bad day in a historic Ferrari

That vid is mistitled. It's not David Ferrar and the guy, while surely having some injuries, amazingly did not die in this Goodwood crash. Watch the entire vid and you'll see he was 100% legitimate. No seatbelt in the 50's front engine F1 machine.
This post was edited on 4/5/22 at 9:37 pm
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
78304 posts
Posted on 4/5/22 at 9:36 pm to
It's a futile comparison. What would Fangio do in today's F1 where he couldn't kick teammates out mid-race. Or handle the computing power of brake balance and engine settings.

Whatever era car they race in would give that era driver a huge advantage.
This post was edited on 4/5/22 at 9:37 pm
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 4/5/22 at 9:44 pm to
That's kind of the point. However I'd guess neither Fangio nor Clark would have a lot of trouble with punching some buttons. On the flip side would Ham or Max be as fast if they actually had to shift the trans? (Old school in car cams are cool in that they are driving with one hand so much due to banging gears)

But saying that, I find the old school drivers much more impressive than anyone from the past 30 years simply due to the risks they took every time they strapped in.

There is very little risk today.

Ride along with Fango testing a 57 Maser F1 car

Check out the curbs. Where's the paved runoff? lolzzz

eta-Excellence in a variety of cars is a good indicator to me of a truly spectacular driver. Mario and Foyt are a couple examples as they excelled in anything with 4 wheels. They would be impressive in Fangio's car to today's F1 cars.

I recall reading an account of Foyt jumping in a Porsche prototype, that he had never driven before, in the rain, at the Daytona 24 and just powering through the field. That's impressive.
This post was edited on 4/5/22 at 9:57 pm
Posted by BottomlandBrew
Member since Aug 2010
29844 posts
Posted on 4/5/22 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

Perez is not fast. Has never been fast. Knows he isn't fast.


Did we watch the same qualifying last week? He's not always fast, but he can be. And speed isn't everything when you have smarts. He can manage his tires better than most on the grid. Checo looks pretty good in that car this year.

That said, I agree with your first statement that he should know his place against Max. Red Bull is Max and Max is Red Bull ever since Max came along. Ricciardo realized that.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 4/5/22 at 9:50 pm to
Perez said himself he couldn't do that lap again in 1000 tries.

He knows.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30393 posts
Posted on 4/5/22 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

Just for giggles - since the names of these drivers have come up recently in this thread


Interesting hypothetical that I will actually give a shot at some point before this weekend. I mean it is impossible and has to be done for giggles but I might see if I can make a simple case for each driver on the list to beat him instead of just picking winners. This isn't to take anything away from Max, he is an exceptional talent and maybe has the best racing genetics of any F1 driver ever, despite a handful of drivers having more accomplished fathers offhand I don't think any of them had a mother that actually was a significant talent also.



Posted by TheArrogantCorndog
Highland Rd
Member since Sep 2009
15923 posts
Posted on 4/5/22 at 11:24 pm to
Let's simplify the debate

Any pevious F1 driver vs current F1 driver

Track: Brands Hatch
Car: 1967 Austin Mini Cooper S

Who ya got??
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 4/5/22 at 11:46 pm to
James Hunt's first race car was a Mini with a milk crate for a seat.

He got thrown out of that race, but since he had experience racing Mini's I'd go with Hunt the Shunt.

Unfair advantage? Probably.

Donohue had lots of experience in bigger sedans so he might be a good choice as well.
Posted by TouchedTheAxeIn82
near the Apple spaceship
Member since Nov 2012
7363 posts
Posted on 4/5/22 at 11:54 pm to
quote:

Let's simplify the debate

Any pevious F1 driver vs current F1 driver

Track: Brands Hatch
Car: 1967 Austin Mini Cooper S

I don't think that's a good car for comparing drivers. Touring car races are fistfights with a bunch of low-powered cars bumping each other around for track position; it's not a good test of speed and car control.

What's desirable is a car with way more horsepower than grip, like a late 60s F1 car.

1967 Lotus 49 at Zandvoort

1967 Lotus 49 at Mexican GP
This post was edited on 4/6/22 at 12:28 am
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30393 posts
Posted on 4/6/22 at 12:21 am to
quote:

Any pevious F1 driver vs current F1 driver

Track: Brands Hatch
Car: 1967 Austin Mini Cooper S

Who ya got??


I will dark horse that one. I'll take Jacky Ickx against the entire current grid. Hell, I'll take three more "Js" as well, Jimmy (Clark), Jackie (Stewart), and John (Surtees).

I think the older generations would have an easier time with low power to weight cars with fenders.... and a manual gearbox. We are probably at the point where a significant portion of the grid would have issues with heel and toe downshifts into a corner.

One note two of my picks have curves at Brands Hatch named after them (Clark and Surtees). Outside of John Cooper (oddly enough given the choice of car) any of the other drivers with a Brands Hatch curve namesake would do well against the current crop in this hypo. Stirling Moss, Graham Hill, Mike Hailwood, and Mike Hawthorn, I think that is the rest of them.

Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 4/6/22 at 8:11 am to
Amid worldwide freight delays that have been triggered by rising transport costs and the impact of the Ukraine war, shipments of equipment that teams had sent weeks ago risked not making it on time.

A ship containing the freight of three teams, which had originally been expected to take 42 days, was delayed by more than one week and that left it on a tight timetable to make it to Australia.

But amid the risk of further delays, F1’s official freight partner DHL intervened last weekend and took the decision to pull the freight from the ship at Singapore and fly it down to Melbourne instead.

https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/rescue-mission-averted-f1-freight-delay-for-australian-gp/9657811/
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 4/6/22 at 8:29 am to
quote:

neither Fangio nor Clark would have a lot of trouble with punching some buttons


They could have trouble being inside such a tight cockpit with a halo.
Posted by TheArrogantCorndog
Highland Rd
Member since Sep 2009
15923 posts
Posted on 4/6/22 at 9:48 am to
quote:

it's not a good test of speed and car control.


Ok, I'll disagree a little bit.. a smaller circuit with a car like that is perfect for seeing who has the best car control and maintaining speed through corners imo... i.e. Goodwood

Watching those smaller cars like the Cortina keep up with the V8 Fords is amazing to see how nimble and agile those things really are... now Clark would absolutely have an advantage if I said Cortina, and in my original question, I would have to give the nod to him over any other

But what the hypothetical does do is provide a basic, no frills spec car (forget tech, forget horsepower that can help recover a mistake) let's give them all tiny contact patches, super nimble cars they can throw around and let the best driver win... its momentum and car placement game
Posted by TouchedTheAxeIn82
near the Apple spaceship
Member since Nov 2012
7363 posts
Posted on 4/6/22 at 10:50 am to
Fair enough. You actually reminded me of one of Schumacher's greatest drives, 1994 Barcelona when he got stuck in 5th gear early in the race, and I think he even did two pit stops in 5th gear, and he still finished P2. He had to change his driving style to get through the race. He said he remembered his karting days and tried to maximize momentum through each corner since he had no power.

youtube.com/watch?v=KKIBvNrfxlQ

You can see from the video that his situation was made worse because this was the year that Senna and Ratzenberger died, and Karl Wendlinger had a devastating crash at Monaco, so F1 was super paranoid and altered dangerous sections of tracks the rest of the year. At Barcelona, they put a very slow chicane at the fast Nissan chicane, so Schumacher had an extra slow corner to deal with. After that year the GP layout bypassed the Nissan chicane, making the track a little less cool.
Posted by The Implication
south philly
Member since Sep 2019
527 posts
Posted on 4/6/22 at 11:20 am to
OG Top Gear has done this test
Jump to page
Page First 122 123 124 125 126 ... 628
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 124 of 628Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram