- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2022 Formula 1 Season Thread
Posted on 4/5/22 at 3:54 pm to YOURADHERE
Posted on 4/5/22 at 3:54 pm to YOURADHERE
And then still end up losing his seat to Gasly for the 2023 season
Posted on 4/5/22 at 3:55 pm to YOURADHERE
quote:Absolutely, he knows his role and executes it admirably.
I'd bet he's perfectly ok with that.
Posted on 4/5/22 at 8:17 pm to YOURADHERE
Perez would be ok with them sabotaging his races just so Max doesn't have to win it on the track?
Posted on 4/5/22 at 8:41 pm to fightin tigers
He better be because that is exactly what will happen in the rare instance he finds him self in front of Max. He knew going in he was #2 on that team.
Perez is not fast. Has never been fast. Knows he isn't fast.
Perez is not fast. Has never been fast. Knows he isn't fast.
Posted on 4/5/22 at 9:09 pm to BuckyCheese
Just for giggles - since the names of these drivers have come up recently in this thread - which of these drivers in their peak beats 2021/22 Max in an equal car over a full season (assuming the car is a front runner and in contention to win both the WDC and WCC):
1) Senna
2) Schumacher
3) Hamilton
4) Gilles Villeneuve
5) Kimi
6) Vettel
7) Prost
8) Hakkinen
1) Senna
2) Schumacher
3) Hamilton
4) Gilles Villeneuve
5) Kimi
6) Vettel
7) Prost
8) Hakkinen
Posted on 4/5/22 at 9:26 pm to hikingfan
The comparison I would like to see is Ham or Max in an exact reproduction of one of Fangio's cars, or Jim Clark's, and see if they could match his time.
Of course that could never happen for a variety of reasons. The main one being neither would go balls out in a car like that as it would be too dangerous for them.
Other than Bianchi's death, which was a freak accident and totally avoidable, their hasn't been a death in F1 since 1994 and they still scream about safety and changing layouts to make them safer. Today's drivers are far too soft and coddled to drive an old school car at the limit.
eta- Dude having a bad day in a historic Ferrari
That vid is mistitled. It's not David Ferrar and the guy, while surely having some injuries, amazingly did not die in this Goodwood crash. Watch the entire vid and you'll see he was 100% legitimate. No seatbelt in the 50's front engine F1 machine.
Of course that could never happen for a variety of reasons. The main one being neither would go balls out in a car like that as it would be too dangerous for them.
Other than Bianchi's death, which was a freak accident and totally avoidable, their hasn't been a death in F1 since 1994 and they still scream about safety and changing layouts to make them safer. Today's drivers are far too soft and coddled to drive an old school car at the limit.
eta- Dude having a bad day in a historic Ferrari
That vid is mistitled. It's not David Ferrar and the guy, while surely having some injuries, amazingly did not die in this Goodwood crash. Watch the entire vid and you'll see he was 100% legitimate. No seatbelt in the 50's front engine F1 machine.
This post was edited on 4/5/22 at 9:37 pm
Posted on 4/5/22 at 9:36 pm to BuckyCheese
It's a futile comparison. What would Fangio do in today's F1 where he couldn't kick teammates out mid-race. Or handle the computing power of brake balance and engine settings.
Whatever era car they race in would give that era driver a huge advantage.
Whatever era car they race in would give that era driver a huge advantage.
This post was edited on 4/5/22 at 9:37 pm
Posted on 4/5/22 at 9:44 pm to fightin tigers
That's kind of the point. However I'd guess neither Fangio nor Clark would have a lot of trouble with punching some buttons. On the flip side would Ham or Max be as fast if they actually had to shift the trans? (Old school in car cams are cool in that they are driving with one hand so much due to banging gears)
But saying that, I find the old school drivers much more impressive than anyone from the past 30 years simply due to the risks they took every time they strapped in.
There is very little risk today.
Ride along with Fango testing a 57 Maser F1 car
Check out the curbs. Where's the paved runoff? lolzzz
eta-Excellence in a variety of cars is a good indicator to me of a truly spectacular driver. Mario and Foyt are a couple examples as they excelled in anything with 4 wheels. They would be impressive in Fangio's car to today's F1 cars.
I recall reading an account of Foyt jumping in a Porsche prototype, that he had never driven before, in the rain, at the Daytona 24 and just powering through the field. That's impressive.
But saying that, I find the old school drivers much more impressive than anyone from the past 30 years simply due to the risks they took every time they strapped in.
There is very little risk today.
Ride along with Fango testing a 57 Maser F1 car
Check out the curbs. Where's the paved runoff? lolzzz
eta-Excellence in a variety of cars is a good indicator to me of a truly spectacular driver. Mario and Foyt are a couple examples as they excelled in anything with 4 wheels. They would be impressive in Fangio's car to today's F1 cars.
I recall reading an account of Foyt jumping in a Porsche prototype, that he had never driven before, in the rain, at the Daytona 24 and just powering through the field. That's impressive.
This post was edited on 4/5/22 at 9:57 pm
Posted on 4/5/22 at 9:44 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
Perez is not fast. Has never been fast. Knows he isn't fast.
Did we watch the same qualifying last week? He's not always fast, but he can be. And speed isn't everything when you have smarts. He can manage his tires better than most on the grid. Checo looks pretty good in that car this year.
That said, I agree with your first statement that he should know his place against Max. Red Bull is Max and Max is Red Bull ever since Max came along. Ricciardo realized that.
Posted on 4/5/22 at 9:50 pm to BottomlandBrew
Perez said himself he couldn't do that lap again in 1000 tries.
He knows.
He knows.
Posted on 4/5/22 at 10:34 pm to hikingfan
quote:
Just for giggles - since the names of these drivers have come up recently in this thread
Interesting hypothetical that I will actually give a shot at some point before this weekend. I mean it is impossible and has to be done for giggles but I might see if I can make a simple case for each driver on the list to beat him instead of just picking winners. This isn't to take anything away from Max, he is an exceptional talent and maybe has the best racing genetics of any F1 driver ever, despite a handful of drivers having more accomplished fathers offhand I don't think any of them had a mother that actually was a significant talent also.
Posted on 4/5/22 at 11:24 pm to Obtuse1
Let's simplify the debate
Any pevious F1 driver vs current F1 driver
Track: Brands Hatch
Car: 1967 Austin Mini Cooper S
Who ya got??
Any pevious F1 driver vs current F1 driver
Track: Brands Hatch
Car: 1967 Austin Mini Cooper S
Who ya got??
Posted on 4/5/22 at 11:46 pm to TheArrogantCorndog
James Hunt's first race car was a Mini with a milk crate for a seat.
He got thrown out of that race, but since he had experience racing Mini's I'd go with Hunt the Shunt.
Unfair advantage? Probably.
Donohue had lots of experience in bigger sedans so he might be a good choice as well.
He got thrown out of that race, but since he had experience racing Mini's I'd go with Hunt the Shunt.
Unfair advantage? Probably.
Donohue had lots of experience in bigger sedans so he might be a good choice as well.
Posted on 4/5/22 at 11:54 pm to TheArrogantCorndog
quote:
Let's simplify the debate
Any pevious F1 driver vs current F1 driver
Track: Brands Hatch
Car: 1967 Austin Mini Cooper S
I don't think that's a good car for comparing drivers. Touring car races are fistfights with a bunch of low-powered cars bumping each other around for track position; it's not a good test of speed and car control.
What's desirable is a car with way more horsepower than grip, like a late 60s F1 car.
1967 Lotus 49 at Zandvoort
1967 Lotus 49 at Mexican GP
This post was edited on 4/6/22 at 12:28 am
Posted on 4/6/22 at 12:21 am to TheArrogantCorndog
quote:
Any pevious F1 driver vs current F1 driver
Track: Brands Hatch
Car: 1967 Austin Mini Cooper S
Who ya got??
I will dark horse that one. I'll take Jacky Ickx against the entire current grid. Hell, I'll take three more "Js" as well, Jimmy (Clark), Jackie (Stewart), and John (Surtees).
I think the older generations would have an easier time with low power to weight cars with fenders.... and a manual gearbox. We are probably at the point where a significant portion of the grid would have issues with heel and toe downshifts into a corner.
One note two of my picks have curves at Brands Hatch named after them (Clark and Surtees). Outside of John Cooper (oddly enough given the choice of car) any of the other drivers with a Brands Hatch curve namesake would do well against the current crop in this hypo. Stirling Moss, Graham Hill, Mike Hailwood, and Mike Hawthorn, I think that is the rest of them.
Posted on 4/6/22 at 8:11 am to Obtuse1
Amid worldwide freight delays that have been triggered by rising transport costs and the impact of the Ukraine war, shipments of equipment that teams had sent weeks ago risked not making it on time.
A ship containing the freight of three teams, which had originally been expected to take 42 days, was delayed by more than one week and that left it on a tight timetable to make it to Australia.
But amid the risk of further delays, F1’s official freight partner DHL intervened last weekend and took the decision to pull the freight from the ship at Singapore and fly it down to Melbourne instead.
https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/rescue-mission-averted-f1-freight-delay-for-australian-gp/9657811/
A ship containing the freight of three teams, which had originally been expected to take 42 days, was delayed by more than one week and that left it on a tight timetable to make it to Australia.
But amid the risk of further delays, F1’s official freight partner DHL intervened last weekend and took the decision to pull the freight from the ship at Singapore and fly it down to Melbourne instead.
https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/rescue-mission-averted-f1-freight-delay-for-australian-gp/9657811/
Posted on 4/6/22 at 8:29 am to BuckyCheese
quote:
neither Fangio nor Clark would have a lot of trouble with punching some buttons
They could have trouble being inside such a tight cockpit with a halo.
Posted on 4/6/22 at 9:48 am to TouchedTheAxeIn82
quote:
it's not a good test of speed and car control.
Ok, I'll disagree a little bit.. a smaller circuit with a car like that is perfect for seeing who has the best car control and maintaining speed through corners imo... i.e. Goodwood
Watching those smaller cars like the Cortina keep up with the V8 Fords is amazing to see how nimble and agile those things really are... now Clark would absolutely have an advantage if I said Cortina, and in my original question, I would have to give the nod to him over any other
But what the hypothetical does do is provide a basic, no frills spec car (forget tech, forget horsepower that can help recover a mistake) let's give them all tiny contact patches, super nimble cars they can throw around and let the best driver win... its momentum and car placement game
Posted on 4/6/22 at 10:50 am to TheArrogantCorndog
Fair enough. You actually reminded me of one of Schumacher's greatest drives, 1994 Barcelona when he got stuck in 5th gear early in the race, and I think he even did two pit stops in 5th gear, and he still finished P2. He had to change his driving style to get through the race. He said he remembered his karting days and tried to maximize momentum through each corner since he had no power.
youtube.com/watch?v=KKIBvNrfxlQ
You can see from the video that his situation was made worse because this was the year that Senna and Ratzenberger died, and Karl Wendlinger had a devastating crash at Monaco, so F1 was super paranoid and altered dangerous sections of tracks the rest of the year. At Barcelona, they put a very slow chicane at the fast Nissan chicane, so Schumacher had an extra slow corner to deal with. After that year the GP layout bypassed the Nissan chicane, making the track a little less cool.
youtube.com/watch?v=KKIBvNrfxlQ
You can see from the video that his situation was made worse because this was the year that Senna and Ratzenberger died, and Karl Wendlinger had a devastating crash at Monaco, so F1 was super paranoid and altered dangerous sections of tracks the rest of the year. At Barcelona, they put a very slow chicane at the fast Nissan chicane, so Schumacher had an extra slow corner to deal with. After that year the GP layout bypassed the Nissan chicane, making the track a little less cool.
Posted on 4/6/22 at 11:20 am to TheArrogantCorndog
OG Top Gear has done this test
Popular
Back to top


0








