- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2019 Kentucky Derby
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:21 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:21 pm to lsupride87
Seems pretty hyper technical as it related to the horse that filed the objection.
Once again, replay has ruined another sport.
Once again, replay has ruined another sport.
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:21 pm to fontell
quote:Yes. But it’s illegal in a sport where unarmed humans are atop animals traveling at fast speeds
They encourage that in NASCAR don’t they?
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:21 pm to mgdtiger
I mean, this ain’t arch rivals lol u can’t do that
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:21 pm to slackster
quote:
What?
Maximum Security absolutely interfered. That's not debatable.
I agree, but frick the horse that actually got knocked, right? Give it to the scrub who benefited from the actual interference.
This is a stupid rule and decision.
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:21 pm to Placebeaux
It absolutely didn’t affect the outcome. The better horse clearly won the race.
This was about the officials making it about themselves. There has never been a winner pulled down due to action on the track at the Derby in 144 years before today. This race will be remembered as the officials awarding a fraudulent “winner”.
This was about the officials making it about themselves. There has never been a winner pulled down due to action on the track at the Derby in 144 years before today. This race will be remembered as the officials awarding a fraudulent “winner”.
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:21 pm to GRTiger
War of Will was going to win
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:21 pm to Deactived
quote:
bullshite. he just had the roses ripped from his guts
The guy said he's going to lose millions. That's not true. He'll lose the purse, but as a stud his time and performance is still there.
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:22 pm to mgdtiger
The 20 was helped by Maximum Security’s interference, if anything.
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:22 pm to fontell
quote:
They encourage that in NASCAR don’t they?
Yes, and they don't call fouls in nascar either.
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:22 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:Yes
I don't get the problem. Just let another horse pass you?
For fricks sake people if this wasn’t a rule there would be a jockey death every race
This post was edited on 5/4/19 at 6:22 pm
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:22 pm to GRTiger
U want them to move up war of will to first lol no they put the horse who interferes behind the horse he interested with
If u agree that he was in the wrong this the right call
If u agree that he was in the wrong this the right call
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:22 pm to Hogwarts
quote:
That jockey is gonna come up missing haha
If Hillary had money on Maximum the poor jockey will commit suicide before sun sets on the bluegrassed hills of Kentucky
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:22 pm to Fus0623
A Sonic for horses....yes...we need a Sonic for horses
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:23 pm to kywildcatfanone
If they are going to start enforcing that in the Derby, which is a valid rule, they need to limit the field to 12, like almost every other race.
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:23 pm to vodka
Bodka, there are only a few of us here who understand the behind the interfered horse rule
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:23 pm to kywildcatfanone
The horse that got screwed the most was the 4. He came to a dead stop and he didn’t file a protest. That to me was interesting.
This post was edited on 5/4/19 at 6:25 pm
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:24 pm to Zendog
This is the first interference in the history of the Derby? 
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:24 pm to Zendog
Anyone bet they TwinSpires?
They haven’t paid on my bets yet, or show my wagers, but the money I wagered is not in my acct
Edit:
It just appeared. $132.
They haven’t paid on my bets yet, or show my wagers, but the money I wagered is not in my acct
Edit:
It just appeared. $132.
This post was edited on 5/4/19 at 6:26 pm
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:24 pm to ZIGG
quote:
It absolutely didn’t affect the outcome.
Umm.. Not saying that War of Will would have won, but he was clearly moving up prior to being interfered with. The interference ended his race.
Popular
Back to top



0










