- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
White House considering tax incentive for more Americans to buy stocks, sources say
Posted on 2/14/20 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 2/14/20 at 1:43 pm
quote:
As part of a forthcoming package of proposed tax cuts, the White House is considering ways to incentivize U.S. households to invest in the stock market.
The proposal would see a portion of income become tax-free for investment purposes.
The Trump administration is considering several proposals as part of forthcoming economic stimulus package
quote:
The proposal, one of many new tax cuts under consideration, would see a portion of household income treated as tax-free for the purposes of investing outside a traditional 401(k). Under one scenario, a household earning up to $200,000 could invest $10,000 on a tax-free basis, although officials noted these numbers are fluid.
“Nothing’s ruled out,” said one senior administration official. “Nothing’s been ruled in, either.”
The development comes as President Donald Trump seeks reelection this fall. He has sought to distinguish himself from his potential Democratic rivals by accusing of them of pursuing “socialist” policies while he has touted tax cuts and deregulation under his administration.
LINK
Posted on 2/14/20 at 1:52 pm to stout
I'd like to see congress enhance the retirement savings credit. Make it actually useful.
Posted on 2/14/20 at 1:55 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
selling stocks today.
Why?
Posted on 2/14/20 at 1:59 pm to stout
Would increase the stock market value as money comes in. But I fully embrace an idea to make stupid people understand that investing their money is a good idea. I think it would be better to do it through 401k or Roth plans though
Posted on 2/14/20 at 2:09 pm to stout
Wonder how this would affect TOD accounts, and would only apply to the investments directly in stocks or if mutual funds would fall under the same consideration.
Posted on 2/14/20 at 2:11 pm to Upperdecker
quote:
But I fully embrace an idea to make stupid people understand that investing their money is a good idea
Don't know if this will help them, about 25% of the employees at my company still won't invest in the 401(k). A few are making decent money and have minimal bills (car note, low rent...), but will try to brag about how much they have sitting in savings & CDs.
Posted on 2/14/20 at 2:15 pm to southernelite
quote:
Why?
i can't buy if its already in it.
Posted on 2/14/20 at 2:35 pm to stout
quote:There was previously a plan for a Roth-like universal savings account, which I thought was awesome (instead of having to save/invest for a specific reason).
could invest $10,000 on a tax-free basis, although officials noted these numbers are fluid.
This sounds similar, but I hope it’s not exclusive to stocks. Even though that’s where I would put the money, I don’t think it’s a good idea to only favor a specific asset class since people have different needs/goals/timelines that may not fit only asset class, plus I think this make an asset bubble more likely than otherwise.
This post was edited on 2/14/20 at 2:38 pm
Posted on 2/14/20 at 3:04 pm to stout
What I would prefer is the ability to save in a 401k more like an IRA. If you could just dial up Fidelity or Vanguard and choose to invest up to 50k a year in a Roth 401k no matter who your employer was that would improve my ability to save for retirement.
I don't need tax credits either. The value of stocks is already inflated enough. But if the law allowed me to save more money more easily that would be awesome.
I don't need tax credits either. The value of stocks is already inflated enough. But if the law allowed me to save more money more easily that would be awesome.
Posted on 2/14/20 at 3:33 pm to Weekend Warrior79
quote:This is where I'm at. This will just give another vehicle to the smart people already investing and looking for tax breaks.
Don't know if this will help them,
Posted on 2/14/20 at 7:10 pm to stout
frick all that. They just need to index LTCG to inflation. The President can do this unilaterally. Why hasn’t he done it yet?!?
Posted on 2/14/20 at 7:24 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
selling stocks today.
shouldnt you be buying more so when money comes on you ride the wave?
Posted on 2/14/20 at 7:53 pm to stout
Trump should allow pretax payments of student loans as well.
Posted on 2/14/20 at 8:12 pm to Ric Flair
quote:
Trump should allow pretax payments of student loans as well.
thats a true game chsnger for a lot of people honestly.
id love to see that although i dont have loans so doesnt help me.
Posted on 2/14/20 at 8:48 pm to Ric Flair
I really don't understand why this isn't a slam dunk thing they can get passed asap. It's an easy win that would help millions.
Posted on 2/14/20 at 10:10 pm to stout
I mean I'm all about having more tax advantaged methods for investing/saving etc. But I have to imagine this mostly helps high earners.
You're either in a position where you're already maxing out IRAs/401ks etc, and need more places to put money.
Or youre at a job that doesn't offer a 401k and your limited to an IRA. In which case, We can't even get people to fund an emergency savings account, let alone budget for money to go into the stock market for tax advantages.
You're either in a position where you're already maxing out IRAs/401ks etc, and need more places to put money.
Or youre at a job that doesn't offer a 401k and your limited to an IRA. In which case, We can't even get people to fund an emergency savings account, let alone budget for money to go into the stock market for tax advantages.
Posted on 2/14/20 at 10:23 pm to Puffoluffagus
quote:
I mean I'm all about having more tax advantaged methods for investing/saving etc. But I have to imagine this mostly helps high earners.
Posted on 2/14/20 at 11:13 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:Well I see a couple of potential issues.
I really don't understand why this isn't a slam dunk thing they can get passed asap. It's an easy win that would help millions.
The first issue, might just be my confusion, but I don’t understand what they mean by taxed when withdrawn as well.”
quote:So is it’s invested after taxes (like a Roth) and then taxed again on withdrawals except for capital gains, doesn’t that imply that I’m paying taxes TWICE in the contributions, presumably at the higher ordinary income rate?
Money put into the account would be done so on an after-tax basis, and taxed when withdrawn as well; but any accumulation of profits during the investment timeframe, known as capital gains, would not be taxed.
Is that’s the case, then I would rather put it into a taxable account and pay lower capital gains (if long-term), because it would take a would take a considerable amount of time and growth to match the contribution amount, just to match the same taxable amount, and then even more time and growth for the savings on the capital gains tax liability to match the savings on the contribution income tax liability.
And the other issue is that with no tax deduction for contributions, the only people who would benefit from the tax free capital-gains withdrawals (unless it’s short-term) are those with a high enough taxable income to meet to have a long-term gains tax liability. And that means it would provide disproportionate benefit to those earn a higher income, and the benefit will decrease as income decrease. And on top of that, those who earn a higher income will have a disproportionate ability to invest (more discretionary income).
So if withdrawals of contributions are taxed, it may not even be benefit at all. And if not, it still might not provide much benefit for most people, if any.
Personally I think that they should allow for a pre-tax deduction and tax fee withdrawals of contributions and gains. And even if that meant they would lower the contribution limit and/or phase out the deduction as income increased (provides more pre-tax savings to those with less capital gains tax savings), that would be much better than what they proposed.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News