Started By
Message

White House considering tax incentive for more Americans to buy stocks, sources say

Posted on 2/14/20 at 1:43 pm
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167101 posts
Posted on 2/14/20 at 1:43 pm
quote:

As part of a forthcoming package of proposed tax cuts, the White House is considering ways to incentivize U.S. households to invest in the stock market.

The proposal would see a portion of income become tax-free for investment purposes.

The Trump administration is considering several proposals as part of forthcoming economic stimulus package


quote:

The proposal, one of many new tax cuts under consideration, would see a portion of household income treated as tax-free for the purposes of investing outside a traditional 401(k). Under one scenario, a household earning up to $200,000 could invest $10,000 on a tax-free basis, although officials noted these numbers are fluid.

“Nothing’s ruled out,” said one senior administration official. “Nothing’s been ruled in, either.”

The development comes as President Donald Trump seeks reelection this fall. He has sought to distinguish himself from his potential Democratic rivals by accusing of them of pursuing “socialist” policies while he has touted tax cuts and deregulation under his administration.


LINK
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166135 posts
Posted on 2/14/20 at 1:50 pm to
selling stocks today.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37024 posts
Posted on 2/14/20 at 1:52 pm to
I'd like to see congress enhance the retirement savings credit. Make it actually useful.
Posted by southernelite
Dallas
Member since Sep 2009
53151 posts
Posted on 2/14/20 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

selling stocks today.


Why?
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30543 posts
Posted on 2/14/20 at 1:59 pm to
Would increase the stock market value as money comes in. But I fully embrace an idea to make stupid people understand that investing their money is a good idea. I think it would be better to do it through 401k or Roth plans though
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
16314 posts
Posted on 2/14/20 at 2:09 pm to
Wonder how this would affect TOD accounts, and would only apply to the investments directly in stocks or if mutual funds would fall under the same consideration.
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
16314 posts
Posted on 2/14/20 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

But I fully embrace an idea to make stupid people understand that investing their money is a good idea

Don't know if this will help them, about 25% of the employees at my company still won't invest in the 401(k). A few are making decent money and have minimal bills (car note, low rent...), but will try to brag about how much they have sitting in savings & CDs.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166135 posts
Posted on 2/14/20 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

Why?


i can't buy if its already in it.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 2/14/20 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

could invest $10,000 on a tax-free basis, although officials noted these numbers are fluid.
There was previously a plan for a Roth-like universal savings account, which I thought was awesome (instead of having to save/invest for a specific reason).

This sounds similar, but I hope it’s not exclusive to stocks. Even though that’s where I would put the money, I don’t think it’s a good idea to only favor a specific asset class since people have different needs/goals/timelines that may not fit only asset class, plus I think this make an asset bubble more likely than otherwise.
This post was edited on 2/14/20 at 2:38 pm
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36105 posts
Posted on 2/14/20 at 3:04 pm to
What I would prefer is the ability to save in a 401k more like an IRA. If you could just dial up Fidelity or Vanguard and choose to invest up to 50k a year in a Roth 401k no matter who your employer was that would improve my ability to save for retirement.

I don't need tax credits either. The value of stocks is already inflated enough. But if the law allowed me to save more money more easily that would be awesome.
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82010 posts
Posted on 2/14/20 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

Don't know if this will help them,
This is where I'm at. This will just give another vehicle to the smart people already investing and looking for tax breaks.
Posted by OleWarSkuleAlum
Huntsville, AL
Member since Dec 2013
10293 posts
Posted on 2/14/20 at 7:10 pm to
frick all that. They just need to index LTCG to inflation. The President can do this unilaterally. Why hasn’t he done it yet?!?
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36748 posts
Posted on 2/14/20 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

selling stocks today.


shouldnt you be buying more so when money comes on you ride the wave?
Posted by MrJimBeam
Member since Apr 2009
12257 posts
Posted on 2/14/20 at 7:35 pm to
He’s a little.....














Slow
Posted by Ric Flair
Charlotte
Member since Oct 2005
13651 posts
Posted on 2/14/20 at 7:53 pm to
Trump should allow pretax payments of student loans as well.

Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36748 posts
Posted on 2/14/20 at 8:12 pm to
quote:

Trump should allow pretax payments of student loans as well.

thats a true game chsnger for a lot of people honestly.

id love to see that although i dont have loans so doesnt help me.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
35289 posts
Posted on 2/14/20 at 8:48 pm to
I really don't understand why this isn't a slam dunk thing they can get passed asap. It's an easy win that would help millions.
Posted by Puffoluffagus
Savannah, GA
Member since Feb 2009
6096 posts
Posted on 2/14/20 at 10:10 pm to
I mean I'm all about having more tax advantaged methods for investing/saving etc. But I have to imagine this mostly helps high earners.

You're either in a position where you're already maxing out IRAs/401ks etc, and need more places to put money.


Or youre at a job that doesn't offer a 401k and your limited to an IRA. In which case, We can't even get people to fund an emergency savings account, let alone budget for money to go into the stock market for tax advantages.
Posted by boomtown143
Merica
Member since May 2019
6680 posts
Posted on 2/14/20 at 10:23 pm to
quote:

I mean I'm all about having more tax advantaged methods for investing/saving etc. But I have to imagine this mostly helps high earners.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 2/14/20 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

I really don't understand why this isn't a slam dunk thing they can get passed asap. It's an easy win that would help millions.
Well I see a couple of potential issues.

The first issue, might just be my confusion, but I don’t understand what they mean by taxed when withdrawn as well.”
quote:

Money put into the account would be done so on an after-tax basis, and taxed when withdrawn as well; but any accumulation of profits during the investment timeframe, known as capital gains, would not be taxed.
So is it’s invested after taxes (like a Roth) and then taxed again on withdrawals except for capital gains, doesn’t that imply that I’m paying taxes TWICE in the contributions, presumably at the higher ordinary income rate?

Is that’s the case, then I would rather put it into a taxable account and pay lower capital gains (if long-term), because it would take a would take a considerable amount of time and growth to match the contribution amount, just to match the same taxable amount, and then even more time and growth for the savings on the capital gains tax liability to match the savings on the contribution income tax liability.

And the other issue is that with no tax deduction for contributions, the only people who would benefit from the tax free capital-gains withdrawals (unless it’s short-term) are those with a high enough taxable income to meet to have a long-term gains tax liability. And that means it would provide disproportionate benefit to those earn a higher income, and the benefit will decrease as income decrease. And on top of that, those who earn a higher income will have a disproportionate ability to invest (more discretionary income).

So if withdrawals of contributions are taxed, it may not even be benefit at all. And if not, it still might not provide much benefit for most people, if any.

Personally I think that they should allow for a pre-tax deduction and tax fee withdrawals of contributions and gains. And even if that meant they would lower the contribution limit and/or phase out the deduction as income increased (provides more pre-tax savings to those with less capital gains tax savings), that would be much better than what they proposed.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram