- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Taking a poll: Who thinks and why:
Posted on 5/26/23 at 11:06 am to boogiewoogie1978
Posted on 5/26/23 at 11:06 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
People are spending like there is no tomorrow. Look at housing and car purchasing.
Imo people are spending money they don’t really have because they are too vain to lower their standards of living to match their economic situation.
Posted on 5/26/23 at 11:20 am to Big_Sur
I agree with Big_Sur except for the political analysis.
Posted on 5/26/23 at 12:12 pm to RoyalWe
quote:
I agree with Big_Sur except for the political analysis.
OK I'll take it! I'm not sure I agree with my own political analysis lol
Strong opinions loosely held, as they say
Posted on 5/26/23 at 12:20 pm to Thomas98
Move #2 out to 6 months and I'm at 1.5.
We're flirting heavily with stagflation right now. The economy is shedding zombie companies like old skin, meaning millions are slowly trickling out into the job-seeking market while (at least higher paying) jobs are shrinking. Credit card rates being so high means they will not be able to live as long on the backs of their cards while they look for another job. This means fewer goods and services being sold.
Gasoline prices being ~$3.50/gallon (nationally) just adds to that poor outlook. Meanwhile, the federal government is throwing a fit about being told they have to cut just the rate of their spending growth (as opposed to cutting total spending YoY) while also pushing green policies which make just about everything more expensive.
Addendum: Inverted yield curves are pretty good at predicting recessions. The length and strength of the current inversion is something we haven't seen since the late 70s. If we do not go through a recession, it will be the first time we've seen an inversion like this not lead into one.
For those choosing the stonks answer (#3), what is it that you see in the economy which makes you choose that option?
We're flirting heavily with stagflation right now. The economy is shedding zombie companies like old skin, meaning millions are slowly trickling out into the job-seeking market while (at least higher paying) jobs are shrinking. Credit card rates being so high means they will not be able to live as long on the backs of their cards while they look for another job. This means fewer goods and services being sold.
Gasoline prices being ~$3.50/gallon (nationally) just adds to that poor outlook. Meanwhile, the federal government is throwing a fit about being told they have to cut just the rate of their spending growth (as opposed to cutting total spending YoY) while also pushing green policies which make just about everything more expensive.
Addendum: Inverted yield curves are pretty good at predicting recessions. The length and strength of the current inversion is something we haven't seen since the late 70s. If we do not go through a recession, it will be the first time we've seen an inversion like this not lead into one.
For those choosing the stonks answer (#3), what is it that you see in the economy which makes you choose that option?
This post was edited on 5/26/23 at 7:28 pm
Posted on 5/26/23 at 12:47 pm to SloaneRanger
quote:The most recent print was like 1 - 1.5% REAL. With inflation as high as it's been, I think that was pretty impressive.
Very low to non-existent GDP growth
The fantasy of the US having sustained 3%+ REAL GDP growth is just that - a fantasy. We no longer have the population growth the fueled those decades in the mid-century. Also, if you run the long-term numbers, it leads to unrealistic results - like everyone basically being independently wealthy by 2100. Just not going to happen.
Posted on 5/26/23 at 12:48 pm to UpstairsComputer
quote:That's because it's just an entirely different situation. Banks in 2007 (and financial firms like BS) were stuffed with inordinate amounts of rated, securitized products that were essentially worthless AND lending against housing was completely out of control. Neither of those conditions exist today.
I say #2. Consumer tapped out. 68% of GDP. Bear Stearns was a crack in the system, but somehow none of the banking issues we have now seem to draw concern. It's amazing.
Posted on 5/26/23 at 1:16 pm to Thomas98
Currently finishing a wage and benefit report for a county in Florida. Wages are up significantly in 2023. Hard to picture a recession when people are making a lot more money than they were in recent years and the housing market is still very stable.
The stock market is more stable now than in was in 2020.
The stock market is more stable now than in was in 2020.
Posted on 5/26/23 at 1:27 pm to SloaneRanger
quote:
Not 1 or 2. We are back in the Obama economy: Very low to non-existent GDP growth and low unemployment caused in large part by so many people not participating in the labor market. Only this time we have rampant inflation. And for many what wage growth there is doesn’t come close to keeping up. Don’t know if that answers your question.
Good post.
I expect unemployment to worsen. But worsening over great numbers is not doom and gloom.
Maybe it will stabilize wage growth which will continue to push up inflation over the next several years in my opinion.
There are worse things in the world than the world's slowest and longest bull runs.
I'm libertarian/conservative, but I don't wish any ill will economically for political gain. "At any cost" is sickening and both sides do it.
Posted on 5/26/23 at 1:59 pm to Big Scrub TX
Meh, 1% GDP growth is pathetic.
ETA: And this is coming out of a so called pandemic where the economy was crippled.
ETA: And this is coming out of a so called pandemic where the economy was crippled.
This post was edited on 5/26/23 at 2:02 pm
Posted on 5/26/23 at 2:51 pm to I Love Bama
In the camp of a recession. Pandemic funds still juicing the system. This is a bubble everything economy that has been pricked by the FED who is backed into a corner. If the FED reversed course, dolla is toast. Hyperinflation here we come!
Posted on 5/26/23 at 2:51 pm to SloaneRanger
quote:1% real is not nothing in a high inflation environment. I think 1.5-2 is possibly sustainable, but 3+ is a pure pipe dream.
Meh, 1% GDP growth is pathetic.
ETA: And this is coming out of a so called pandemic where the economy was crippled.
Posted on 5/26/23 at 4:30 pm to Bard
quote:AI will bring on productivity gains across the market. The tech gains we’ve seen are more about investing in AI itself. People have not started investing because of what leveraged AI will do for other companies. Once productivity begins to actually show then the market will rise. AI is a step-change technology with broad impact. Let’s not also forget increased automation which is significantly impactful but not as broadly as AI. That’s the market.
For those choosing the stonks answer (#3), what is it that you see in the economy which makes you choose that option?
People will lose jobs. The buggy whip makers will have to learn new skills. Automation will require workers, both mechanical and technical. AI will squeeze out lower-end white collar workers of today. Those who are technical and talented will reap rewards. I’m a little concerned from a have / have-not perspective and the angst that situation has caused historically. We (well, others, not me) have been raising a generation of degenerate dumbasses. Not sure which way things will go ultimately, but if it’s bad it’s going to be really bad.
Posted on 5/26/23 at 4:38 pm to I Love Bama
quote:Yes, this is a legit source of losses that will have to work through the system.
Commercial Real Estate - Everyone bought with ballon loans coming due with rents that can't support the new interest rates. 100% fricked.
quote:Meh. Way less levered than 2007, way higher lending standards have persisted since then. Lots of equity in general to support a correction. Nothing existential.
Residential Real Estate - Transaction levels are approaching lock down velocity with interest rates showing no sign of coming down. Only thing keeping it from crashing is low unemployment rates. If we hang on to low unemployment, we might can weather this storm.
quote:On the one hand, I don't see many bull rallies STARTING at 18X earnings. But on the other, nominal earnings are keeping pace (and beating) inflation, so no reason for a crash or anything.
Stock Market - Much harder to predict as people much smarter than myself frick up their predictions all the time. My personal guess is we have many more banks go under due to the high interest rate environment that spreads throughout the market.
Posted on 5/26/23 at 4:49 pm to I Love Bama
quote:
It's really this simple.
All markets are fricked. I don't understand how you guys can't look at these markets objectively and not see we are on the edge of a cliff.
Agree. As I consume different opinions from media and other sources experienced in economics, I notice that bank economist are heavily guaranteeing a mild recession before the end of the year. The Fund managers, who have money to lose, are pretty much saying the markets going to boom.
Both groups have an interest in protecting their own business interest, but one can only be protected as long as people don't start divesting their stocks and stop buying their stocks.
Now my personal opinion is that, there is not enough time for a deep recession. 2024 is a presidential election year and the Democrats are going to have to start walking back some policy decision to get the economy going quickly.
This post was edited on 5/26/23 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 5/26/23 at 4:50 pm to Thomas98
We’re not entering a recession with the labor market strength today.
Maybe it starts in 3mos.. but I vote option D) 6-9mos.
Rates moving up and stupid valuations are suggesting recession isn’t right here, right now.
Maybe it starts in 3mos.. but I vote option D) 6-9mos.
Rates moving up and stupid valuations are suggesting recession isn’t right here, right now.
Posted on 5/27/23 at 6:53 am to Thomas98
We were already in a recession, until they "literally" changed the definition of what a recession was.
Posted on 5/27/23 at 10:28 am to dragginass
quote:
We were already in a recession, until they "literally" changed the definition of what a recession was.
Yep. This administration gets the dubious honors of being the first ever to have 2 different recessions without ever ending the first.
Posted on 5/27/23 at 12:18 pm to Newgene
Great question. I have no idea. I feel like they are able to MiniPlayer what they want. I do not think prices will go down though.
Posted on 5/28/23 at 12:28 am to bayoudude
quote:
Imo people are spending money they don’t really have because they are too vain to lower their standards of living to match their economic situation.
Tale as old as time. Keeping up with the "Joneses" is a real thing. I'm sure there are plenty of money board posters who have crumbled to their significant other's request for an awful purchase.
Posted on 5/28/23 at 9:45 am to Thomas98
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/18/23 at 1:57 pm
Popular
Back to top
