Started By
Message

re: What’s up with Caden Durham?

Posted on 8/17/26 at 8:48 am to
Posted by ChatGPT of LA
Member since Mar 2023
8323 posts
Posted on 8/17/26 at 8:48 am to
quote:

He was not very good last season. Would not surprise me at all if he was passed up.


Yeah, we were so well coached and loaded at qb, its so hard to understand why we didn't run for 6 billion yds
Posted by GetmorewithLes
UK Basketball Fan
Member since Jan 2011
23774 posts
Posted on 8/17/26 at 8:51 am to
quote:

Dead on, he has all the physical traits but lacks the most important thing “vision”


I made a similar comment on vision but in thinking more about it I dont know how his "vision" is in Lane's running game. We ran some version of zone read all the damn time and the QB never ran the ball so every RB we had ran into a wall of defenders.

Here is to something different this season!
Posted by LSUShock
Kansas
Member since Jun 2014
5808 posts
Posted on 8/17/26 at 9:00 am to
We've been underwhelming at RB all of Kelly's tenure. His game against SC was a lone bright spot and probably came with too much credit. Imagine these other guys have to be more of what were used to seeing.
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
79865 posts
Posted on 8/17/26 at 9:05 am to
TIL Durham is still at LSU.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
58188 posts
Posted on 8/17/26 at 9:16 am to
quote:

He’s extremely fast and great in the passing game.

I saw several DBs flat out run him down. He looks like he has decent football speed for a running back, but certainly not “extremely fast”.
Posted by IM_4_LSU
McKinney, TX
Member since Mar 2014
15130 posts
Posted on 8/17/26 at 9:16 am to
quote:

I don't think his vision is that poor. I just think he doesn't have great explosive traits or elite speed.


Its literally the opposite. You need to actually look at his history. He doesn't get a lot of 4-5 yard runs on a consistent basis. He created a lot of explosive plays in the run and pass game.

quote:

Then you see a guy like Jeremy Hill. He didn't have an elite 40 time (he ran a 4.6 at the combine). However, DBs and LBs rarely ran him down from behind.


Situations are not the same. Jeremy Hill was in a pro-style offense and majority of those "long runs" were out of 21 or 12 personnel and against a heavy box (7-8 defenders). Therefore if you broke through the first level and made the first guy miss you were clear to the endzone. Jeremy Hill did have very good top end speed as well but all of Caden's big runs except for the run last year against Florida were in spread formations 11 or 10 personnel with lighter boxes so he was having more defenders deep to try and out-run. If you look at his '24 season he was creating explosive plays on very good clip and his top end speed was still very good. But was slightly less than '24. Now that could be because he had less long runs where he could get out the gates or could be from being nicked last season.
Posted by SteveLSU35
Shreveport
Member since Mar 2004
15153 posts
Posted on 8/17/26 at 9:26 am to
You just never know what will happen when the games start. If he gets an opportunity and makes a play good things will happen.
Posted by Gnash
KTX
Member since Oct 2015
11857 posts
Posted on 8/17/26 at 9:39 am to
quote:

Extremely fast? I remember him getting hawked down by one of the smaller tier opponents.

He had a breakaway vs Vandy and got caught inside the 5 IIRC. We still couldn’t punch it in for a TD
The 2025 offense was allergic to the endzone
Posted by Nate711
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2017
327 posts
Posted on 8/17/26 at 9:40 am to
Lane said something to the media a week or two ago that kind of stuck with me. One of the reporters asked him a question about the offensive line and added that it was "clearly the biggest problem with the team last year".. The first thing he said when he responded was "Yea but you also have guys that are running the ball that have to run it"... To me, that implies that they saw some things on film that wasn't on the line and more on the RB's... Seems like what we are seeing now with Durham getting pushed down the depth chart and Berry working as the back up reflect that a bit
Posted by 304tiger
West Virginia
Member since Jan 2022
3194 posts
Posted on 8/17/26 at 9:41 am to
He hasn't quite been the same since the weird endzone injury 2 years back. He looked great prior to that.

I don't really agree that Kiffin and Weiss will incorporate lots of different backs. At Ole Miss, they really liked to feature a guy as the bell cow RB, even before Lacy.

FWIW, I thought this was going to be a big year for Durham to bounce back and build on what we saw in 2024.
Posted by philly444
stuck in contraflow
Member since Nov 2008
12592 posts
Posted on 8/17/26 at 9:46 am to
He was never the same after Miles Frazier fell and rolled up on his ankle
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
33275 posts
Posted on 8/17/26 at 9:53 am to
quote:

The first thing he said when he responded was "Yea but you also have guys that are running the ball that have to run it"... To me, that implies that they saw some things on film that wasn't on the line and more on the RB's...


This part stuck out the most to me from that press conference. Made me think that the prior coaching staff underserved the running backs and that they have some catching (coaching) up to do.
Posted by Donkus
Shreveport
Member since Feb 2013
1684 posts
Posted on 8/17/26 at 9:54 am to
That was the most atrocious offensive line play I have seen since the late 90s. If the 'vision' is every lane closed and two of your blockers are pancaking air, of course he's going to look bad. I couldn't tell you how many but it was often that some carries for no gain were actually blown up in the backfield and the runner just out-talented the defense to get back to the line of scrimmage.
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
49822 posts
Posted on 8/17/26 at 9:58 am to
quote:

He was not very good last season.


He and Berry were virtually identical in the rushing game. Durham had more rushing TDs, though. Durham was significantly better in the receiving game
Posted by BeastTigers10
Member since Dec 2013
615 posts
Posted on 8/17/26 at 10:17 am to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


He was looking really good on the runs LSU Football just posted at least.

The big hits from Delane(13) & Jhase Thomas(28) stood out though.
This post was edited on 8/17/26 at 10:19 am
Posted by Tiger4life306
Member since Apr 2016
937 posts
Posted on 8/17/26 at 10:17 am to
I have a hard time believing he will be 4th on the depth chart whenever the season gets going. I still have faith in him. This seems like preseason hype chatter coming out of fall camp.
Posted by friendlyobservation
Member since Mar 2024
6016 posts
Posted on 8/17/26 at 11:02 am to
He looks slow because he doesn't have vision. Has nothing to do with losing a step. He was never fast on LSU's campus in football pads. Runs a great track time but when he's bursting on the football field he has never looked fast even his freshman year. When you're complacent to hit holes, you look slow. His issue is vision because as bad as OL was last year it opened holes up for him he wasn't taking. He got better second half last year but overall he missed a lot of easy big 20 yard runs with one cut running straight into his OL.
This post was edited on 8/17/26 at 11:05 am
Posted by 1999
Where I be
Member since Oct 2009
34411 posts
Posted on 8/17/26 at 11:05 am to
reports all camp have jones/berry as 1a/1b, gage is pushing. after that.
Posted by grich31
Youngsville, La
Member since May 2008
2353 posts
Posted on 8/17/26 at 11:06 am to
I can see his role being kinda like Josh Williams, the do everything get the tough yards back
Posted by Settlement Alliance
Member since Mar 2019
145 posts
Posted on 8/17/26 at 11:11 am to
Damn. Well, he just won me the Heisman in NCAA 27.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram