Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

What's the latest on Clark, Niang, Levy, and Dessert?

Posted on 10/15/26 at 8:03 pm
Posted by goldenmoment
Member since Aug 2011
360 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 8:03 pm
Please bring me up-to-the-minute!
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
49335 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 8:05 pm to
The recruiting board has no new news.

Clark is waiting on judge’s ruling in Kentucky from a hearing yesterday. The rest waiting on NCAA to act.
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
31555 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 8:11 pm to
Sankey says no.
Steve and Johnson said frick you Sankey
This post was edited on 10/15/26 at 8:44 pm
Posted by jamarr
Member since Jul 2019
1957 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

judge’s ruling


why did wade say some new players would be eligible for UCF but they weren't? seems ominous
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
49335 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

why did wade say some new players would be eligible for UCF but they weren't?
Likely because he expected action from the NCAA sooner, but they’re dragging their feet. Also, the KY judge could have ruled prior to the game last night, but noted he needs to rule in writing.
quote:

seems ominous
To some, I guess, depending on perspective and context.
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
83585 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 8:55 pm to
My speculation, wade thought there was a chance niang and dessert were cleared either right before or during it. So he had them on the roster just in case. Same with clark in that kentucky hearing
Posted by Honkus
Member since Aug 2005
59007 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 8:56 pm to
Posted by jamarr
Member since Jul 2019
1957 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

To some, I guess, depending on perspective and context


and would you consider it good news to be confident about, that these players were not playing vs UCF as wade anticipated?
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
49335 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

and would you consider it good news to be confident about, that these players were not playing vs UCF as wade anticipated?
Are you asking was it good news that we could have had more players available last night, but didn’t? Of course not.

Am I bleeding all over the board making assumptions and concerned and saying it’s ominous? Also, of course not.

Having an anticipation of a timeline and it not coming to fruition exactly on time isn’t a reason to panic.
Posted by jamarr
Member since Jul 2019
1957 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

Am I bleeding all over the board making assumptions


no one is. just concerning.

quote:

was it good news that we could have had more players available last night, but didn’t? Of course not


correct. its concerning.

quote:

isn’t a reason to panic


no one is. in fact I said so explicitly: "i am not gonna panic". just concerned.

the word I used previously was that it was "concerning". it is. that's why I repeated "concerned" or a derivation of it 9 times now. 9 times.

thanks.
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
49335 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 9:39 pm to
We understand your concern. Thanks.
Posted by jamarr
Member since Jul 2019
1957 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

We understand your concern. Thanks


next time don't mischaracterize anything and you wont get a lecture.
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
49335 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

next time don't mischaracterize anything and you wont get a lecture.
Posted by chadr07
Rapides Parish
Member since Jan 2015
15303 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

he expected action from the NCAA sooner, but they’re dragging their feet



The NCAA has always drug their feet. Don’t know why Wade expected any different.
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
35668 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

judge’s ruling


why did wade say some new players would be eligible for UCF but they weren't? seems ominous


He said he thought they should be cleared by then. He is just guessing.
Posted by jamarr
Member since Jul 2019
1957 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

He said he thought they should be cleared by then. He is just guessing.




well that's concerning, getting pretty close to the season to be this short of players.

I went to the UCF game and it was frustrating to see all that talent in warmups on the bench while 5 guys played a zillion exhausting minutes
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
75447 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 10:24 pm to
quote:

next time don't mischaracterize anything and you wont get a lecture.



The topic is basketball, not your insults, attacks and condescending to other posters. Please stop doing this in every thread.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
75447 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 10:25 pm to
He was planning to pay them until Sankey started his shite in the media.
Posted by Sir Fury
Member since Jan 2015
5457 posts
Posted on 10/15/26 at 10:44 pm to
He had good reason to believe they would be cleared by now as several other players were recently cleared having very similar situations, and only just ahead of these guys in line. Some of these guys were teammates of the players we,'re pushing to get eligible. I assume the order is decided by when the paperwork is submitted. So they should know approximately where they are in order because those players likely communicate with each other.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram