Started By
Message

We should be psyched about how last night went

Posted on 9/13/26 at 6:36 am
Posted by Tdubs7
Member since Aug 2024
835 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 6:36 am
Not a lot of film study or things to work on with a 70-7 blowout and starters sitting by the third quarter. Every great team has sloppy a game like this, so if that’s the one then much better than later in the schedule.
Posted by WillWorkForLSUTicket
Tiger Country
Member since Aug 2005
845 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 6:42 am to
I want to believe.
Posted by Trip Savage
Member since Sep 2026
18 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 6:46 am to
basically it was a positive step for this football team last night overall. I think the running game is going to demolish Ole Piss this next weekend haha
Posted by PenguinPubes
Frozen Tundra
Member since Jan 2018
11881 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 6:48 am to
We just came off of a thrashing of Clemson and playing an in state school, you had to expect we were going to come out a little flat.

You always hear “your defense travels” and our defense looks fricking elite. I’m stoked to have some fricking dudes on that side of the ball.

Offense is cool and all but I love when lsu has a physical dominant defense.
Posted by Tiger Voodoo
Champs 03 07 09 11(fack) 19!!!
Member since Mar 2007
22247 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 6:49 am to
Definitely flat is a part of it, but also key to remember there is no chance we did any kind of in depth game planning for this.

With OM and A&M on the horizon guarantee we were already doing prep and installing things specifically for them. We clearly wanted to work on things in the passing game after a run heavy week 1.

We still moved the ball well and absolutely shut them down on D. We just had some tough miscues with the turnovers that kept the score looking ugly.


This game week and next week are going to be so damn intense, I definitely assume the players got a bit of a bye week lite type of environment after Clemson.

This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 6:51 am
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
22421 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 6:52 am to
I’d bet a lot this team is focused this week. It’s human nature to relax after a good performance like the one versus Clemson
Posted by deathvalleytiger10
Member since Sep 2009
9487 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 6:57 am to
Oline really struggled until Tech wore down. That’s a little concerning.

Sam missed a lot of throws, especially with deep balls.

Hopefully this is a wake up call. Play anywhere close to that the next 2 weeks and we will be 2-2.
Posted by Septiger
Member since Nov 2020
3707 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:09 am to
Is Leavitt good enough to beat an elite defense with his passing when the run game isn’t working?

Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
175800 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:12 am to
Didn't get to catch the game and was checking score and stat updates on my phone. It appears the defense has given up nothing in 2 games when it matters. That has to be encouraging.
Posted by Bayou
Boudin, LA
Member since Feb 2005
43731 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:22 am to
Last week was a gift. This week you saw the lack of experience playing together. The chemistry ain't there yet. It will get there though.
Posted by Metaloctopus
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2018
7101 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:41 am to
Man, I'm trying to look at it as as if it's simply the inevitable sloppy game of the year. The thing is, as bad as 4 turnovers in the first half was, it's not the sloppiness of turnovers that concerns me near as much as not being able to run the ball against La Tech. That's not a matter of being sloppy, it's just about lining up and winning one on one battles with the man across from you. Our offensive line couldn't do that.

Can we scheme around it? Obviously we're going to have to, because last night proved that we can't just line up and run people over at the line of scrimmage. I thought we had done that last week, but we must have just had them guessing all game, and out of position. Hopefully, with a less vanilla game plan against better teams than we played last night, we'll have teams guessing again.

We used to have sloppy games in the Miles era, where (except against Alabama) we'd still run for 250-300 yards. I'm not advocating to go back to those days, but it would be nice to have that kind of offensive line again.
Posted by Yeti_Chaser
Member since Nov 2017
13547 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:45 am to
I'm disappointed that we didn't see better chemistry between Sam and the WRs. I thought that would be something that would improve quickly. There isn't much time left
Posted by Tigahs24Seven
Charlie Kirk's America
Member since Nov 2007
15425 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 8:11 am to
quote:

the inevitable sloppy game of the year. The thing is, as bad as 4 turnovers in the first half was, it's not the sloppiness of turnovers that concerns me near as much as not being able to run the ball against La Tech.


How about the fact that the WR group cant catch....
Posted by SOL2
Dallas burbs
Member since Jan 2020
9431 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 8:12 am to
Newsflash - OM does not have an elite D, maybe A&M does. Sam should be adequate at OM. Our D will win the next 2 games, not Sam, unless he cleans up a lot and settles down.
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18922 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 8:12 am to
quote:

want to believe.


Me too.
Posted by Yeti_Chaser
Member since Nov 2017
13547 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 8:36 am to
quote:

OM does not have an elite D, maybe A&M does. Sam should be adequate at OM. Our D will win the next 2 games, not Sam, unless he cleans up a lot and settles down.

Maybe you missed it last night but most of Sam's problems are not defense-induced, hence why La Tech was able to hang around despite not having an "elite D." It's just a lack of chemistry with the WRs, lack of pre-snap plan, and an urgency to improvise before things break down.

I don't expect Sam to struggle anymore next week than he did last night. In fact most of those issues are so correctable that I expect improvement (although I also thought we'd see more improvement from W1 to W2 than we did). Regardless, OM still has a much better offense than we've seen so far. I expect our defense will give them trouble but itll be tough to hold them to under 14. We will need some improvement on offense.
Posted by jacquespene8
Nashville, TN
Member since Sep 2007
4510 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 9:05 am to
It’s a little of both. We all worry a tad because of a lackluster performance, but like Kiffin even said, he’s got the teams attention now.
Posted by sharkfhin
Water
Member since Sep 2008
6901 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 9:07 am to
quote:

want to believe.
at times we didnt look real on offense last night. I want to believe also
Posted by redfish99
B.R.
Member since Aug 2007
19856 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 9:13 am to
I’ve always said week to week results mean very little when you tee it up for the day of. Still think we ar better team just execute we win next week
Posted by paulb52
Member since Dec 2019
9282 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 9:13 am to
Passing game needs some work. Leavitt not a good deep passer. Quick to take off and run but can he survive a 12 game season running more than throwing deep?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram