Started By
Message

Trinidad had 2 yards rushing

Posted on 9/21/26 at 7:41 am
Posted by burke985
UGANDA
Member since Aug 2011
29357 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 7:41 am
They contained him, I think the score on their drive to re take the lead was just a product of a good play recognition by chambliss he saw Benefield bite on the run option and the gate was left wide open Benefield just lost containment if he stays outside that play don't happen. So saying we cannot contain a running QB is BS he beat us throwing the football
This post was edited on 9/21/26 at 7:42 am
Posted by mtb010
San Antonio
Member since Sep 2009
6619 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 7:43 am to
Chambliss contained himself because he didn’t have to run. Did you not watch the game?
Posted by GrizzlyWintergreen
Member since Jun 2025
3143 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 7:44 am to
At one point Chambliss led our guys on a goose chase in the backfield for what seemed like 30 seconds.

We didnt contain him, he contained himself. Ole Miss fans dont realize how much they'll regress without that guy. Hes insane.
Posted by burke985
UGANDA
Member since Aug 2011
29357 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 7:45 am to
There were times when he had to run and he was forced to throw bad throws he threw a pick on one. Little shovel pass was just him being a great player, kind of like mahomes ad libbing. His second half when we actually pressured him was completely different than the first half and he did not run all over us and yes he would have had to run because Lacey was out
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
93599 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 7:45 am to
AGAIN......................

pay attention





quote:
They had like 60 yards rushing dude.



u miss the whole point

this was discussed ad infinitum earlier today.

"Chambliss didn't need to run bc we gave him a soft zone all night.

This isn't the gotcha you think it is.

What was Chambliss' numbers on third down, specifically third and long. I know at one point he was like 8/8 for over 170 yards.

Think about that. That's third and long. That is when, as a top tier defensive coach, you are supposed to make the opposition crumble. Instead, our opponent's thrive and get huge chunk plays. Chambliss made Baker his bitch again, and this time Baker made it so easy for him. There were passes I could have made last night bc they had 2-3 guys wide open simply due to the cushion our DBs were providing at the snap."

here is whole thread

LINK
Posted by burke985
UGANDA
Member since Aug 2011
29357 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 7:46 am to
I'm not worried about us containing a running QB I think we got the players, we played the soft zone because we were so nervous about his throwing ability not his running ability. They were trying to keep everything in front of them instead he picked them apart because he's a great quarterback
Posted by Celery
Nuevo York
Member since Nov 2010
11882 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 7:46 am to
LSU’s game plan was make Chambliss throw it, Ole Miss’s game plan was also make Chambliss throw it.
Posted by Open Your Eyes
Member since Nov 2012
10720 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 7:50 am to
quote:

There were times when he had to run and he was forced to throw bad throws he threw a pick on one. Little shovel pass was just him being a great player, kind of like mahomes ad libbing. His second half when we actually pressured him was completely different than the first half and he did not run all over us and yes he would have had to run because Lacey was out

There are too many stupid people in this world.
Posted by TigerMonkey7
Member since Jul 2021
5315 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 7:53 am to
Chambliss is baker mayfield with a better arm. Ole Miss fans are so retarded for thinking that level of play is sustainable once he leaves
Posted by 0
Member since Aug 2011
18386 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 7:53 am to
quote:

LSU’s game plan was make Chambliss throw it,


LSU seemed very content in taking away the running game and making Chambliss complete 7-8 10 yard passes in a row. I'm sure Baker and Lane thought if they limited the big plays, he would eventually force a pass or two and LSU would take advantage. Chambliss not only showed incredible poise and precision passing it but he also was more than happy taking what was given
Posted by Tht_1_Night_At_ElCid
Member since Sep 2026
299 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:10 am to
it's going to be just like LSU losing Burrow. Or the Saints losing Brees.

They'll never be the same truly. They'll always be talking about those wonder years. They'll get decent talent back at QB eventually. But it will never be the same. It'll be like a crack head remembering their first hit of crack. Next season is going to be an existential crisis for them.

They'll always be thinking about that first hit (their Heisman Quality QB).
This post was edited on 9/21/26 at 8:12 am
Posted by Pedropatterstine
Member since Aug 2026
1043 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:11 am to
Om fans thinkntheir backup will be as good or better. The fall is going to be fun to watch.
Posted by Tht_1_Night_At_ElCid
Member since Sep 2026
299 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:13 am to
They've never had enough success to be able to recognize when they have generational talent at QB that they won't see again for a decade or two.

Poor bastards.
Posted by Woodman17
Seattle
Member since Sep 2026
55 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:14 am to
I would love to have an analysis of how much holding the Ole Miss Offensive Linemen were getting away with . . .
Posted by John Casey
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2016
4469 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:18 am to
quote:

LSU seemed very content in taking away the running game and making Chambliss complete 7-8 10 yard passes in a row.


And the strategy likely works if Leavitt could complete passes to wide open WRs.
Posted by IM_4_LSU
McKinney, TX
Member since Mar 2014
14977 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:20 am to
There was a poor angle taken by Ty and Chambliss was able to beat him with speed due to the poor angle. But I don't have an issue with how we contained him I have an issue with the off coverage we deployed.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
90220 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:24 am to
A 20 yard sack kinda helps out.
Posted by back9Tiger
Island Coconut Salesman
Member since Nov 2005
18188 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:25 am to
and he sliced he defense apart throwing we play off them so much. Alot of good that did us.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
74202 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:26 am to
I wish he would’ve had 100 and scored fewer points because we stopped the pass at least somewhat.
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
49184 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:33 am to
quote:

At one point Chambliss led our guys on a goose chase in the backfield for what seemed like 30 seconds.


And found a TE for 13 yards on 3rd and 12.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram