
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Features of a Blake Baker Defense You Should Be Used To By Now...
Posted on 9/20/26 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 9/20/26 at 1:02 pm
Yeah Yeah, TLDR, you are a pussy for pointing out the obvious, here's some downvotes, etc. I don't care....
This is just year one of the Lane Kiffin era. Lane will figure out in a few weeks when another decent mobile QB eliminates us from playoff contention that he will never win a title with Baker as DC. Hopefully he fires him at year end. I wanted Bake gone with the entire Kelley garbage group last year. I'm in every thread last week trying to temper expectations because we have yet to see Baker face a decent QB. Well, once again we get a good taste of what the rest of the year will be like when we go up against a decent or great QB.
With that, here are features of a Blake Baker defense for those of us who actually pay attention:
If your QB is in the bottom half of college football QBs, then you are going to get skull fricked by the Baker defense. You will be lucky to break 50 yards rushing. You will turn the ball over frequently. You will be sacked 4-5 times. You will have at least 7-10 plays that will go for no gain or a loss. You will leave the game wondering how many NFL players were on the other side of that vaunted LSU defense.
If your QB is in the top half of QBs (60 or above), then you are in good shape. If that QB is mobile, then you are going to look like a Heisman contender. Here's the best part. If you are a decent QB and you are playing a Baker defense for the second or third time, your numbers are going to improve each game (See Marcel Reed, Jalen Milroe, Chambliss, etc as a few examples). He cannot scheme to stop you. In fact, most of the game you will see the same looks you saw years prior or even better, he will play a very soft zone so you can just throw a five yard pass all game long.
3rd and Long (7 yards or more)? No problem! We will sit back in a soft zone, only rush 2-3, no spy, play ten yards off the WR/TE, and allow you all day to set your feet and throw to whoever you want. Everyone will be open due to the cushion our DB's will provide. Easy picks ups. The only thing that will stop you is if you overthrow it. If you decide not to throw, no worries, there are plenty of open running lanes available to pick up that easy first down.
Get the ball before halftime with no time outs and a minute on the clock? You are pretty much going to get gift wrapped a TD. Last year, Bama only needed 30 seconds and three plays to get a TD right before half. We are going to sit back in a prevent and just let you do what you want until you score. Baker HATES having momentum going into the locker room. Go look at every big game of his era so far. The opposition has scored easily before HT even in situations where they had hardly any time and no time outs.
Second half adjustments? LOLOLOLOL IF we make the adjustments, we will revert back to the scheme that won't work as soon as the score is tied or LSU claws back to take a lead. Last night was a great example of this. As soon as LSU gained all the momentum and tied the score, Baker went right back to the soft zone and OM marched right down the field. Even if Leavitt doesn't shite the bed and somehow ties the game, OM would have gotten the ball back with a 145 and no time outs. Baker would have gift wrapped them a score to end it. LSU would have just lost 35-32 or 39-32 (this is more likely).
Let's say the week before you played LSU, you got your arse handed to you by a mid tier team that actually used a solid scheme and stopped you. Don't worry, Baker won't watch that film and replicate it. You will be OK just watching how you played against him last year. You will see that again.
From this point forward, don't expect anything to change. We have not seen it change in three years. Marcel Reed will once again drag his nuts across Baker's face for the third year in a row. He will beat us exactly how he has beaten us the past two years. 8&4 will easily put up 35-40 points and likely win by a TD. I think we can score on their D too, but Baker won't be able to get the stops when it matters. Yeah, freaking KY gave us the plan on how to stop him, but it won't matter. We won't do any of that, and if we do, it will only be for 1-2 series.
I'll add to this novel later this afternoon when I'm bored again. Downvote away.
This is just year one of the Lane Kiffin era. Lane will figure out in a few weeks when another decent mobile QB eliminates us from playoff contention that he will never win a title with Baker as DC. Hopefully he fires him at year end. I wanted Bake gone with the entire Kelley garbage group last year. I'm in every thread last week trying to temper expectations because we have yet to see Baker face a decent QB. Well, once again we get a good taste of what the rest of the year will be like when we go up against a decent or great QB.
With that, here are features of a Blake Baker defense for those of us who actually pay attention:
If your QB is in the bottom half of college football QBs, then you are going to get skull fricked by the Baker defense. You will be lucky to break 50 yards rushing. You will turn the ball over frequently. You will be sacked 4-5 times. You will have at least 7-10 plays that will go for no gain or a loss. You will leave the game wondering how many NFL players were on the other side of that vaunted LSU defense.
If your QB is in the top half of QBs (60 or above), then you are in good shape. If that QB is mobile, then you are going to look like a Heisman contender. Here's the best part. If you are a decent QB and you are playing a Baker defense for the second or third time, your numbers are going to improve each game (See Marcel Reed, Jalen Milroe, Chambliss, etc as a few examples). He cannot scheme to stop you. In fact, most of the game you will see the same looks you saw years prior or even better, he will play a very soft zone so you can just throw a five yard pass all game long.
3rd and Long (7 yards or more)? No problem! We will sit back in a soft zone, only rush 2-3, no spy, play ten yards off the WR/TE, and allow you all day to set your feet and throw to whoever you want. Everyone will be open due to the cushion our DB's will provide. Easy picks ups. The only thing that will stop you is if you overthrow it. If you decide not to throw, no worries, there are plenty of open running lanes available to pick up that easy first down.
Get the ball before halftime with no time outs and a minute on the clock? You are pretty much going to get gift wrapped a TD. Last year, Bama only needed 30 seconds and three plays to get a TD right before half. We are going to sit back in a prevent and just let you do what you want until you score. Baker HATES having momentum going into the locker room. Go look at every big game of his era so far. The opposition has scored easily before HT even in situations where they had hardly any time and no time outs.
Second half adjustments? LOLOLOLOL IF we make the adjustments, we will revert back to the scheme that won't work as soon as the score is tied or LSU claws back to take a lead. Last night was a great example of this. As soon as LSU gained all the momentum and tied the score, Baker went right back to the soft zone and OM marched right down the field. Even if Leavitt doesn't shite the bed and somehow ties the game, OM would have gotten the ball back with a 145 and no time outs. Baker would have gift wrapped them a score to end it. LSU would have just lost 35-32 or 39-32 (this is more likely).
Let's say the week before you played LSU, you got your arse handed to you by a mid tier team that actually used a solid scheme and stopped you. Don't worry, Baker won't watch that film and replicate it. You will be OK just watching how you played against him last year. You will see that again.
From this point forward, don't expect anything to change. We have not seen it change in three years. Marcel Reed will once again drag his nuts across Baker's face for the third year in a row. He will beat us exactly how he has beaten us the past two years. 8&4 will easily put up 35-40 points and likely win by a TD. I think we can score on their D too, but Baker won't be able to get the stops when it matters. Yeah, freaking KY gave us the plan on how to stop him, but it won't matter. We won't do any of that, and if we do, it will only be for 1-2 series.
I'll add to this novel later this afternoon when I'm bored again. Downvote away.
Posted on 9/20/26 at 1:32 pm to SludgeFactory
Here is another one of my favorites, which is not putting a spy on a mobile QB. How could I forget that one as it is beyond obvious.
No worries though. We will see that one again next week when we are wondering why Reed is getting 20-30 yards a pop like he did last year.
No worries though. We will see that one again next week when we are wondering why Reed is getting 20-30 yards a pop like he did last year.
Posted on 9/20/26 at 1:33 pm to SludgeFactory
How many rushing yards did Chambliss have?
Posted on 9/20/26 at 1:36 pm to SludgeFactory
quote:
Marcel Reed will once again drag his nuts across Baker's face for the third year in a row
can you come up with a different thought? You dwell on nuts on faces. Not to mention you're full of shite.
Posted on 9/20/26 at 1:36 pm to El Jefe de Tu Mama
Vanilla defense will get you no where. Coupled with an anemic offense it was hard to watch
Posted on 9/20/26 at 1:37 pm to SludgeFactory
I wanted him gone too, never understood why everyone was so caught up in keeping him. Wilts in big games
Posted on 9/20/26 at 1:38 pm to El Jefe de Tu Mama
quote:
How many rushing yards did Chambliss have?
Good one. Box score shows 2 yds net rushing. But but Reed is gonna drag his nuts over Bakers face! Just you see!
Posted on 9/20/26 at 1:39 pm to El Jefe de Tu Mama
quote:
How many rushing yards did Chambliss have?
Chambliss didn't need to run bc we gave him a soft zone all night.
This isn't the gotcha you think it is.
What was Chambliss' numbers on third down, specifically third and long. I know at one point he was like 8/8 for over 170 yards.
Think about that. That's third and long. That is when, as a top tier defensive coach, you are supposed to make the opposition crumble. Instead, our opponent's thrive and get huge chunk plays. Chambliss made Baker his bitch again, and this time Baker made it so easy for him. There were passes I could have made last night bc they had 2-3 guys wide open simply due to the cushion our DBs were providing at the snap.
Posted on 9/20/26 at 1:39 pm to El Jefe de Tu Mama
quote:
How many rushing yards did Chambliss have?
He didn't need to run because he often had forever in the pocket and his WRs had 10-yard cushions. His running TD is what sealed it though and we had absolutely no one in sight somehow trying to account for him in case he pulled it and ran like he did on that last TD.
Posted on 9/20/26 at 1:40 pm to El Jefe de Tu Mama
read this thread
i think you miss the point
use a spy in a zone put the rest in man and or blitz either cover o or use 1 safety deep just in case. instead we kept all in zone watching so he did not need to run he picked us apart underneath.
i think you miss the point
use a spy in a zone put the rest in man and or blitz either cover o or use 1 safety deep just in case. instead we kept all in zone watching so he did not need to run he picked us apart underneath.
Posted on 9/20/26 at 1:42 pm to canyon
quote:
can you come up with a different thought? You dwell on nuts on faces. Not to mention you're full of shite.
You followed me around this morning bleeding all over my replies.
Are you Baker's dad?
Oh wait, that's Jalen Milroe.
So, tell us, what Reed did two years in a row to Baker didn't happen?
Let's say it did happen (it did), then how will Baker stop Reed THIS time. You seem very sure. Believe me, I hope you are right. I'm tired of watching QBs like that just shite all over LSU.
Posted on 9/20/26 at 1:42 pm to SludgeFactory
nobody knows who you are
nobody cares what you think
nobody cares what you think
Posted on 9/20/26 at 1:44 pm to Big EZ Tiger
quote:
He didn't need to run because he often had forever in the pocket and his WRs had 10-yard cushions. His running TD is what sealed it though and we had absolutely no one in sight somehow trying to account for him in case he pulled it and ran like he did on that last TD.
Oh look, a fan that actually pays attention and understands football.
I knew there were some that posted here.
Posted on 9/20/26 at 1:45 pm to SludgeFactory
quote:
when another decent mobile QB eliminates us from playoff contention
Uh, this has already happened. There will be no playoffs for this team, especially with Green out.
Posted on 9/20/26 at 1:46 pm to SludgeFactory
quote:
Chambliss didn't need to run bc we gave him a soft zone all night.
This isn't the gotcha you think it is.
What was Chambliss' numbers on third down, specifically third and long. I know at one point he was like 8/8 for over 170 yards.
Think about that. That's third and long. That is when, as a top tier defensive coach, you are supposed to make the opposition crumble. Instead, our opponent's thrive and get huge chunk plays. Chambliss made Baker his bitch again, and this time Baker made it so easy for him. There were passes I could have made last night bc they had 2-3 guys wide open simply due to the cushion our DBs were providing at the snap.
Posted on 9/20/26 at 2:11 pm to SludgeFactory
ain't following you around "bleeding" over your posts. Just tiresome with the same old bs about how bad Baker's D scheme is. We saw it. Yes, we gave up a shite ton of receiving yardage. No, I don't like that soft shite, but I would like to see us shut down Reed next weekend. Chambliss tore us up with his passes underneath. Almost 400 yards passing. SMH.
Ok, I am hopeful we can contain Marcel Reed next week. I could be very wrong and he runs all over us. We shall see.
Ok, I am hopeful we can contain Marcel Reed next week. I could be very wrong and he runs all over us. We shall see.

Popular
Back to top
6













