Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

The Green Base

Posted on 5/22/24 at 8:14 pm
Posted by h0ll@yaboy
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2013
136 posts
Posted on 5/22/24 at 8:14 pm
I’m not opposed to it being used all season long. I find it funny that the SEC has not shown the no call walk off collision between us and bama when it’s been discussed, as evidence of it being a good addition.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25348 posts
Posted on 5/22/24 at 8:15 pm to
Don't want to show the incompetence of the umpire crew and replay crew.
Posted by fastlane
Member since Jul 2014
2465 posts
Posted on 5/22/24 at 8:15 pm to
I like it. There is no excuse now if the runner gets hit. Should be automatic out.
Posted by LSBoosie
Member since Jun 2020
8346 posts
Posted on 5/22/24 at 8:17 pm to
You think it should be an automatic out if the catcher hits the runner with the ball?
Posted by Basura Blanco
Member since Dec 2011
8547 posts
Posted on 5/22/24 at 8:22 pm to
I do not think there is a real need for it, but not opposed to it being a permanent thing.

I caught the tale end of Schlosnagle discussing it on the ESPN set last night, and I didn't realize there were additional rules associated with it such as the white base belongs to the fielder and the green belongs to the runner and if a runner hits the white and not green bag he technically never touched first and can be tagged/called out on appeal. I assumed it was treated as one large base, but apparently not. I also assume that only applies if there is an actual play at first and not on an extra base hit where the runner steps on the white base on his way to second?
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
31171 posts
Posted on 5/22/24 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

You think it should be an automatic out if the catcher hits the runner with the ball?



If he isn't in the running lane, it is. But that is what this is supposed to help prevent.
Posted by RockChalkTiger
A Little Bit South of Saskatoon
Member since May 2009
10583 posts
Posted on 5/22/24 at 8:24 pm to
Why does it have to be a base? Why can’t it be flat like home plate?
Posted by kciDAtaE
Member since Apr 2017
16020 posts
Posted on 5/22/24 at 8:25 pm to
The green base in the A&M game looks closer to home than the standard base. And that was a close play.
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
43683 posts
Posted on 5/22/24 at 8:26 pm to
Instead of green base why not go to the larger base that mlb uses
It would have a similar effect
Posted by GoneFishing21
Member since May 2017
3409 posts
Posted on 5/22/24 at 8:28 pm to
So the umpire can see the base as the runners foot touches it. A flat plate is usually being slid into on close plays. That’s not how it works at first base.
Posted by BBQ
Member since Oct 2018
86 posts
Posted on 5/22/24 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

You think it should be an automatic out if the catcher hits the runner with the ball?


Actually never thought about it but that would be epic. Like kickball.

I always hated this play in baseball but this could completely change my outlook =-)
This post was edited on 5/22/24 at 8:32 pm
Posted by LSBoosie
Member since Jun 2020
8346 posts
Posted on 5/22/24 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

If he isn't in the running lane, it is.

I understand that, the rule hasn’t changed. His wording is confusing me.
Posted by CWILKS3
Covington
Member since Apr 2020
848 posts
Posted on 5/22/24 at 8:30 pm to
Correct, they were discussing it yesterday I believe in the LSU game or maybe it was the SC/Bama game.

But let’s say a ground ball is hit to the SS and is bobbled or mishandled and goes to the outfield, the runner does not have to touch the green base. But if there’s a play to be made in the infield, the runner must touch the green base
Posted by bearhc
Member since Sep 2009
4955 posts
Posted on 5/22/24 at 8:32 pm to
Get rid of it; it is ridiculous.
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
14850 posts
Posted on 5/22/24 at 9:21 pm to
So if the first baseman comes down on the green base it’s automatically safe? Does that mean if they touch any part of the green base it’s automatically safe?

Since the bases are connected does it remove one side of the base for the first baseman to touch.
Posted by lsuexpert57
Back Brusly
Member since Oct 2008
1605 posts
Posted on 5/22/24 at 11:23 pm to
LSU is 2-0 with the green base...I vote for keeping it!!
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
31171 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 6:41 am to
quote:

I understand that, the rule hasn’t changed. His wording is confusing me.

Yeah, I get that.
Posted by Metaloctopus
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2018
6025 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 6:53 am to
quote:

I caught the tale end of Schlosnagle discussing it on the ESPN set last night, and I didn't realize there were additional rules associated with it such as the white base belongs to the fielder and the green belongs to the runner and if a runner hits the white and not green bag he technically never touched first and can be tagged/called out on appeal. I assumed it was treated as one large base, but apparently not. I also assume that only applies if there is an actual play at first and not on an extra base hit where the runner steps on the white base on his way to second?


Another rule with this green base is that if anyone makes a throw that pulls the first baseman off the bag to where he cuts in front of the runner, the runner is allowed to avoid the fielder and touch the white base if that's his only lane. Which is a very common sense rule, I think.

I don't think there's a real need for this base, either, but it's one of the few changes baseball has attempted to make in recent years that wasn't awful, and clearly detrimental to the game.
This post was edited on 5/23/24 at 6:54 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram