- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Seriously - does anyone think that an EBR judge is going to get this right?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:24 am to Hale Lipari
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:24 am to Hale Lipari
Do you think that Ole Miss has standing to have a judge declare that someone is not eligible under an SEC or NCAA rule, or must that be brought by the conference or the NCAA?
1
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:24 am to Hale Lipari
Then you are stupid. Wait til the discrimination lawsuits hit the sec if that's the case.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:26 am to dinosaur
Ole Miss absolutely has standing in an Oxford court
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:27 am to Hale Lipari
I think when the AG Liz Murril filed an amicus brief in support of the players yesterday, thay should be a pretty big tell which way this thing is heading
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:29 am to Honkus
Liz has taken a dangerous position for the state in this case
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:30 am to Yeahright
quote:
How do they expect a judge to make a ruling in less than a day?
Because most of his decision is probably already written. It's just waiting to be revised based on the hearing today.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:32 am to Hale Lipari
quote:
at the end of the day - right would be the NCAA simply amending the 5 for 5 rule and allowing the 2022 class a fifth year and allowing (for this one year only) the players who went to the NFL to go back to college
This guy gets it. Think objectively, not like a functional retard.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:35 am to DCTiger
Seriously - thank you - you have renewed my confidence in Tiger Rant! But to be transparent - I have a little bit of experience in matters like this!
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:45 am to Hale Lipari
I have been saying since debacle began, eligibility TROs would go away if the NCAA simply amended their rule for the 2022 class and exempted any player who participated in any NFL actions (contracts, mini-camps, preseason, etc). The NCAA is making this hard on themselves for no logical reason OR they’re purposely being silent to force action by the Conferences. The SEC is being arbitrary and capricious by choosing to fight one eligibility rule (NFL players) over another (the Chambliss v NCAA medical exemption). They (the 2022 class and Chambliss) are all eligible or not. The SEC cannot and should not pick winners and losers.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:48 am to Hale Lipari
The 19th JDC is a judicial hellhole filled with incompetent Southern Law School judges. It's a joke of a district, the ruling will be automatically appealed. The 19th is a joke.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:49 am to DCTiger
Amen - even though LSU is not a party to the litigation, IMO I think LSU has an interest in this far beyond a back-up tight end and defensive tackle - Will Wade's entire LSU basketball roster is composed of former professional players - if the SEC wins this case, LSU cannot field a basketball team this season
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:52 am to TJ_Burke
quote:
The 19th JDC is a judicial hellhole filled with incompetent Southern Law School judges. It's a joke of a district, the ruling will be automatically appealed. The 19th is a joke.
Maybe so, but Will Jorden is pretty solid despite this.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:56 am to Hale Lipari
That’s ridiculous. But wait, this whole thing has been ridiculous for 18 months.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:58 am to Yeahright
quote:
How do they expect a judge to make a ruling in less than a day? Has this judge seen the papers that have been filed and already has read them and has an opinion already? So many questions......
Honestly I wouldn't be surprised for him to just stop everything. Cant play yet, rule cant be enforced, and he decides sometime next week
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:58 am to Hale Lipari
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:59 am to Hale Lipari
quote:
Liz has taken a dangerous position for the state in this case
Not particularly, even if it goes in favor of the SEC, all she did was insert her opinion, and can use it as a platform of "I just support our state universities and state economy, and all workers" that's about the worst she's done... It's not gonna hurt her no matter what the result is
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:07 am to JayVegas702
Her position for the state in this case will be used against the state in unrelated civil litigation down the line
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:09 am to Hale Lipari
Valid point. There's certainly potential for that
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:17 am to JayVegas702
Judge Jorden is a solid judge, IMO. I also understand he has told whoever that he is retiring at the end of the term.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:18 am to lowhound
quote:
Could have said the same thing with an Ole Miss alum judge ruling on the Chambliss case
Exactly.
It's why the SEC is trying so hard to just get the actual schools to agree to certain rules.
To keep from having 100s of cases in local courts with often with contradictory results.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News