Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:32
Registered on:7/10/2025
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: The more things change

Posted by Hale Lipari on 11/11/25 at 6:19 pm to
BTW - i did not mean that in a derogatory manner - i just don't know how you get to that many posts - that's impressive
No - I am not - I am simply stating that the lawsuit does not request monetary relief - and it does not - the lawsuit will not result in a money judgment being awarded to BK for any amount of liquidated damages - it is a lawsuit designed to obtain a leverage position! It does not even allege that LSU breached any contract.

re: The more things change

Posted by Hale Lipari on 11/11/25 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

Member since May 2011
104027 posts


Wow!
I don't settle disputes like cretins - but then again, that appears to be what this is all about!

P.S. if we were to meet at Sonic (or let's make it Popeyes instead), you would not enjoy the meeting.
Clear communication requires no explanation!!

You made an idiotic statement thinking you were being cute - got called on it - and now you cannot find (or simply won't take) the off ramp! Stop while your behind.
Dude - if you are a lawyer, I hope you limit your practice to justice of the peace court!
quote:

Which is effectively a monetary judgement that was actively being negotiated


Your post did not say "effectively requesting a money judgment" - your post said that a declaratory judgment would be "effectively a money judgment" and then completely implodes on itself by continuing to say that the "effective money judgment" was still being actively negotiated - well which is it brainiac? a judgment or a negotiation - stay with the amateurs
You obviously can't read - the lawsuit does not request a monetary judgment and cannot result in a judgment being rendered awarding BK money - please leave the legal work here to the professionals who do it
Agreed - the relief requested in the lawsuit is simply a declaration that BK's termination with without cause and that he is entitled to the full amount of the buyout. The lawsuit does not request a monetary judgment.
I am sure that Nuss is a good kid, a good leader and team mate, and bleeds purpose and gold. I have nothing against the kid personally. However, he is not an upper level SEC quarterback. He's soft and plays scared which is why is refuses to run and refuses to step up in the pocket. Horrendous OL play has a lot to do with his stepping up into the pocket. Just the facts.

re: The Truth About Scott Woodward

Posted by Hale Lipari on 10/31/25 at 10:18 am to
fair enough - I appreciate your response - for what it's worth, my source is about as close to the horse's mouth as you can get

re: The Truth About Scott Woodward

Posted by Hale Lipari on 10/31/25 at 9:53 am to
You must be responding to someone else because your post has nothing to do with what I said - I am not saying that his departure was justified - i am simply saying that these two issues are what led to his departure -
John Carmouche - plaintiff trial lawyer appointed by Landry

Rico Alvendia - plaintiff trial lawyer appointed by Landry

James Williams - plaintiff trial lawyer - appointed by Edwards but wants reappointment by Landry

Pat Morrow - plaintiff trial lawyer - appointed by Edwards but wants reappointment by Landry

Glenn Armentor - plaintiff trial lawyer - appointed by Edwards but wants reappointment by Landy

Landry "the conservative" is a fraud and the BOS is dominated by trial lawyers
Scott's two mistakes that led to his departure: (1) he hired Kelly without the BOS even knowing about it until it was announced and contract approval was sought - this has been in their craw ever since (2) the firing and the timing of the firing of Will Wade

re: BR-CHS

Posted by Hale Lipari on 10/31/25 at 9:31 am to
Jealousy will get you nowhere
notwithstanding that he has absolutely no constitutional authority under the Louisiana constitution regarding who chooses and how the next coach at LSU is chosen - political power? yes - he appoints the BOS - but the BOS has the sole authority to determine how the next coach is chosen including whether SW is involved in that process - is comments were simply a threat to the BOS
Thanks but I have a job - try it sometime