- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SEC leaning towards 1 division
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:27 pm to Indiana Tiger
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:27 pm to Indiana Tiger
quote:
There are tie-breakers today, and there will be tie-breakers tomorrow. They will come up with something. E.g: Record against common opponents and probably others.
And those approaches suck compared to head to head or a division record.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:27 pm to bretwayne13
Ok with this but get rid of the permanent partners. Everybody has the same rotating schedule.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:27 pm to Indiana Tiger
quote:
Probably 9 game schedule with 3 permanents. Each team could have their own custom setup
So a pod system?!
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:29 pm to Indiana Tiger
quote:Too late!
No more Cinderella's like 2001 LSU.




Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:29 pm to Portcityblues
quote:
If it is 3 permanent opponents and 6 other games. Essentially that is the equivalent to a pod schedule they are just lumping all together for Championship game
seeding.
It's the equivalent of pods in that there are 3 perms. This set up allows every team to have a different 3 perm. Maximizes the preservation of rivalry games.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:30 pm to bretwayne13
I like the sound of it.
Nothing is locked in stone forever as long as he doesn’t call the division “Legends” or “Leaders” it’s a quality start.
Nothing is locked in stone forever as long as he doesn’t call the division “Legends” or “Leaders” it’s a quality start.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:36 pm to bretwayne13
Cant wait to see Bama’s rotation.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:37 pm to Geauxldilocks
quote:
And those approaches suck compared to head to head or a division record.
It's going to happen, but not as often as you seem to think it will happen. First, there has to be a tie. Second, you didn't play each other. With this schedule, there is only 6 teams you are not playing. So it's more likely you played them than not.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:38 pm to Geauxldilocks
There's no way they're putting Bama with Auburn, Tenn, LSU. At least not with other schools like Tennessee getting Vandy and SCar.
I'd happily drop Ole Miss and A&M for Auburn and Florida to balance that. But they seem hellbent on keeping us and A&M together, and it's kind of annoying. Let A&M have Arkansas and leave us alone
I'd happily drop Ole Miss and A&M for Auburn and Florida to balance that. But they seem hellbent on keeping us and A&M together, and it's kind of annoying. Let A&M have Arkansas and leave us alone
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:41 pm to WaterLink
quote:
There's no way they're putting Bama with Auburn, Tenn, LSU. At
Agree, but it should be close to that with probably 5-10 different games total.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:45 pm to lsufb1912
quote:"ranked" means what???
2 highest ranked teams play for championship. Makes sense
Silly voter polls?
Hard pass on that.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:45 pm to WaterLink
quote:
Let A&M have Arkansas and leave us alone
For all of A&Ms resources, they’re likely to always be a .500 team (like they are last 30 years in SEC and Big 12 play). I say keep them, they’re really Kentucky with oil money.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:48 pm to nitwit
quote:
Call me a skeptic or pessimist, but the SEC could really play games with scheduling using this arrangement. I wonder how Alabama will fare once the conference starts working with new schedules and permanent games...
Everyone will have to play every team is the SEC home and away within a 4 year period. Not a lot you can do. If you go easy one year, they're going in really hard the next.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:49 pm to MrWalkingMan
quote:
So a pod system?!
No. A pod system is where each team within the pod plays one another every year.
This would be each team has their own separate permanent opponents.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:56 pm to Geauxldilocks
quote:
For all of A&Ms resources, they’re likely to always be a .500 team (like they are last 30 years in SEC and Big 12 play). I say keep them, they’re really Kentucky with oil money.


Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:59 pm to Alt26
quote:
conference championship games go by the wayside
I think they should but they make way too much money off of them for them to go away.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:59 pm to Indiana Tiger
quote:
9 game SEC schedule with 3 permanent opponents. You will play the entire SEC home and away in 4 years.
That would still be pods genius.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 2:02 pm to Alt26
quote:
I think with a 12 team playoff you are going to eventually see conference championship games go by the wayside
Using this year as an example, this would be perfect for LSU. We would get in without the risk of injury from an extra game.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 2:05 pm to AcetylCoA
quote:
That would still be pods genius.
It's not though. Let's say LSU's permanents are A&M, Ole Miss, and Florida. It would be a pod if Florida had to also play Ole Miss and A&M yearly, it would be a pseudo-division where the whole pod has each other as permanents. But that's not what this proposal is, everyone has different permanent opponents.
Popular
Back to top
