0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SEC Considering Luxury Tax Beyond A Spending Cap
Posted on 11/6/26 at 3:56 pm to Yaboylsu63
Posted on 11/6/26 at 3:56 pm to Yaboylsu63
quote:
Players could sue for damages if this goes into effect since there is no pay for play.
Yep
Would have to collectively bargain
Posted on 11/6/26 at 3:57 pm to YeauxTigers
Sankey is a retard
Posted on 11/6/26 at 4:18 pm to YeauxTigers
A rev share cap won't sow anything down. NIL is still wide open, and that is the bulk of the money anyway.
Posted on 11/6/26 at 4:24 pm to YeauxTigers
At this point it feels like Sankey is doing everything hat he can to get fired and they keep refusing to fire him.
Posted on 11/6/26 at 4:27 pm to YeauxTigers
Teams would just leave eventually.
Posted on 11/6/26 at 4:27 pm to YeauxTigers
Is this frickhead a slavering imbecile?
Posted on 11/6/26 at 4:34 pm to DmitriKaramazov
I don’t understand this. What teams are spending revenue share money above what they were allotted? And how?
This post was edited on 11/6/26 at 4:35 pm
Posted on 11/6/26 at 4:41 pm to nicholastiger
Who tf cares what the longhorns want, but the idea is so Ferengi. Just an attempt by POSs to get a rake.
Posted on 11/6/26 at 4:43 pm to friendlyobservation
100%
Posted on 11/6/26 at 4:47 pm to DBG
I believe the Protect College Sports Act, which proposes to increase the Revenue sharing limit to the $40 plus million number. True NIL paid through outside parties under contract would not be subject to this number. However, if the school or affiliated persons funnels NIL money directly to players, then that would have to count against the Revenue Sharing limit. Not sure if this is going to pass now. So I think the Big 10 and SEC want to do something similar on their own in case the Act doesn’t pass. I believe the Big 10’s explanation said something like they cannot punish players for receiving excess combined Revenue Sharing and School Related NIL, because that would be in violation of the Supreme Court NIL ruling, but they did believe they could punish the schools for overspending.
I think the NCAA wanted the Protect College Sports Act because they felt that would offer more protection from the law suits in local courts. I don’t know if that’s the case if conferences are adopting their own rules that aren’t uniform. We’ve got enough chaos with the local courts cases. We don’t need every conference making up it’s own rules with no uniformity.
I think the NCAA wanted the Protect College Sports Act because they felt that would offer more protection from the law suits in local courts. I don’t know if that’s the case if conferences are adopting their own rules that aren’t uniform. We’ve got enough chaos with the local courts cases. We don’t need every conference making up it’s own rules with no uniformity.
Posted on 11/6/26 at 4:48 pm to bbnitiger
Why are federal bill always named the exact opposite of what they will actually do?
Posted on 11/6/26 at 4:48 pm to YeauxTigers
quote:Will the players also have to pay the luxury tax?
SEC Considering Luxury Tax Beyond A Spending Cap
Posted on 11/6/26 at 4:52 pm to bbnitiger
Got it.
This will be challenged immediately in court.
We have NCAA rules. School presidents don’t abide by them though. This could all be fixed if school presidents directed their ADs and coaches to simply follow the rules already in place. But they don’t do that.
quote:
However, if the school or affiliated persons funnels NIL money directly to players, then that would have to count against the Revenue Sharing limit. Not sure if this is going to pass now. So I think the Big 10 and SEC want to do something similar on their own in case the Act doesn’t pass. I believe the Big 10’s explanation said something like they cannot punish players for receiving excess combined Revenue Sharing and School Related NIL, because that would be in violation of the Supreme Court NIL ruling, but they did believe they could punish the schools for overspending.
This will be challenged immediately in court.
quote:
We don’t need every conference making up it’s own rules with no uniformity.
We have NCAA rules. School presidents don’t abide by them though. This could all be fixed if school presidents directed their ADs and coaches to simply follow the rules already in place. But they don’t do that.
Posted on 11/6/26 at 4:52 pm to YeauxTigers
It’s like the liberals are purposefully wanting to tear down the southern schools that southerner fans hold dear.
Posted on 11/6/26 at 5:24 pm to YeauxTigers
Kick his stupid a$$ out and hire a good commissioner. Sankey is an idiot.
Posted on 11/6/26 at 5:30 pm to YeauxTigers
He put the SEC at a huge disadvantage with the 85 scholarship limit the previous 3 years. That’s why the big ten got a big jump having the extra 20 scholarships while we had 20 walk ons. It got repealed just this year.
Posted on 11/6/26 at 5:37 pm to YeauxTigers
Time to bolt this communist conference.
Posted on 11/6/26 at 5:40 pm to ProjectP2294
He's dying to make the SEC less competitive. Think the Big 10 will do this? Sankey needs to go. It's not his money. He's an abject failure.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News