Started By
Message

re: Scott Woodward was not responsible for Jimbo’s buy out. Love him/hate him this is not true

Posted on 10/30/25 at 9:01 am to
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
40262 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 9:01 am to
quote:

Yes. He doubled his salary and extended him, when his market demand was nowhere near that.


Pretty sure the salary bump was an incentive in the contract if a title was won.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
101411 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 9:04 am to
I dislike Woodward because he is BFF with a man (James Carville) who thinks I should be put in a re-education camp because of my politics.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
40262 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 9:07 am to
quote:

Burrow won that championship just like cam won in 2010 and not chizik


Burrow didn't hire the coaching staff.

Burrow didn't recruit the team that won that championship.

Burrow didn't convince Alleva that Orgeron could build the right team.

Burrow was a fricking 3rd stringer at aOSU when Orgeron was building that team, you idiot.
Posted by IM_4_LSU
Savannah, GA
Member since Mar 2014
12757 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 9:14 am to
You're not wrong. But again, Jimbo was Woodward's hire. The extension was dumb as he still would've been fired in 2023 with 4 years left on the original deal but the buyout would have been reasonable. The extension made it ridiculous. However, it was not a good hire which is what people try to point to they just don't have all their facts straight.

I personally don't mind that hire as Jimbos tenure got bad toward 2022 and beyond not so much earlier in the tenure but I still get why people think the hire was a bad one overall when his best season was a Covid season.
Posted by klrstix
Shreveport, LA
Member since Oct 2006
3506 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 9:17 am to
quote:

...Scott brought Mr. Fat Cheeks to A&M. Same thing with Brian Kelly.


on the one hand ... I understand this take but in part this is hindsight... Kelly's 1st year at LSU showed promise...

IMO... Hiring Kelly in this case was in some sense understandable under the circumstances... Statistically Kelly had a good track record and seemed to bring some stability...

His contract on the other hand was over the top. ( IMO...).. and the problem there is its impossible for me to know how much of that is on Woodward vs other influences amongst the donors...

Problem is picking a coach is not simply a numbers game.. prior success is not a guarantee of future outcomes...

Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
26919 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 9:27 am to
quote:

If A&M still fires Jimbo in year 6 then the buyout amount would have been closer to $30 million without the extension.
correct. I updated my number… 30 million is still a large number but not the large amount that keeps getting thrown out
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
36475 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 9:39 am to
quote:

correct. I updated my number… 30 million is still a large number but not the large amount that keeps getting thrown out


If you set aside the 75 million jimbo buyout then the $30 million would be the number 3 buyout of all time


Kelly then becomes number 1. Orgeron is number 8.



I think it’s safe to say Woodward is responsible for 3 of the top 10 buyouts in history.



That’s like hall of fame bad AD
Posted by dos crystal
Georgia
Member since Aug 2008
4888 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:47 am to
quote:

If you set aside the 75 million jimbo buyout then the $30 million would be the number 3 buyout of all time Kelly then becomes number 1. Orgeron is number 8. I think it’s safe to say Woodward is responsible for 3 of the top 10 buyouts in history.


The season isn’t over. Norvell has a larger one. freeze very well could go, if Lincoln is fired, that’s another one.

You can hate on Woodward. That’s fair game. However, you start looking at other name coaches, the contracts aren’t much different. Kelly was ranked 8th as top paid coaches. What if one of the other 8 etc have to fire their coach?
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
37699 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:15 am to
More hindsight 20/20 bullshite.
Posted by Macavity92
Member since Dec 2004
6328 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:37 am to
Jimbo was extended before the 2021 season. At the time his buyout was about $45 million. As a result of the extension, had he been fired before Dec. 1, 2021 (end of the season) he would have been owed $95.6 million.

Therefore, the extension added about $50 million to the buyout. The buyout when he was fired was $77.5 million, more than the original 10-year $75 million contract.

Before A&M extended him he had seasons of 9-4, 8-5, and 9-1, the last being 2020, the Covid season. With 7 years left on the contract there was no urgency to give an extension. Post-extension he went 8-4, 5-7 and 6-4 (fired midseason). It is highly unlikely he would have left. No other school was going to give such a one-sided contract to a coach.

There was also no offset clause in the buyout provision (either the original or the extension), something that is in the Kelly and Franklin contracts.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86486 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:40 am to
quote:


This dishonest argument that the 2nd contract is all that matters is crazy
You can't actually believe this.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
71297 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:46 am to
quote:

There was also no offset clause in the buyout provision (either the original or the extension)

A&M has always done lump sum buyouts. Even before Woodward, Sumlin's contract had a lump sum buyout payable in 60 days. That's just how A&M has done business because they have the money to do it that way.

So I'm not going to put that all on Woodward. A&M, for years, just threw out large sums of money at coaches with fully guaranteed lump sum buyouts so they can outbid whoever they want when hiring a coach. They knew they had money in droves where it didn't really matter what they would be on the hook for as long as they hired the guy their boosters wanted.

As for hiring Jimbo in 2018, let's not forget, Jimbo was a popular name for LSU's job when we fired Miles in 2016. He'd won a national title in 2013 and followed that up with 33 wins over the next 3 seasons. He didn't have a good 2017 season, but hiring him in 2018 wasn't a crazy hire. I don't think anyone would have predicted he'd end so poorly there with what he'd done throughout his career up to that point

This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 11:50 am
Posted by bdavids09
Member since Jun 2017
1360 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:58 am to
quote:

Burrow didn't hire the coaching staff.

Both coordinators aranda and ensmimger were miles hires he inherited.
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
10616 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

However, it was not a good hire which is what people try to point to they just don't have all their facts straight.


I mean he got them to (and won) the only NY6/BCS bowl they've been to since 1998



Posted by Tridentds
Sugar Land
Member since Aug 2011
23494 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:14 pm to
OP you are 100% correct. Woodward had nothing to do with the idiotic extension and guarantee.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
40262 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:35 pm to
Miles ran out of trained monkeys and hired Slinger to coach TE. It took Orgeron to look at that staff and realize Slinger could run the offense better than Cameron.
Posted by NorCali
Member since Feb 2015
1584 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 1:29 pm to
First contract. 10 years 75 Million correct??
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram