re: Proof the LSP video and diagram is in error.

Who avoids a head-on collision by driving into a head-on collision? Why not rear-end the gold truck as opposed to a head-on collision? That just doesn't make sense. Not a single person on this post can honestly say they would've opted to crash head-on into another vehicle to avoid rear-ending a vehicle on the side of the road.

Then again, I guess nobody heard when she said she was trying to make it into the parking lot. Did she mean the parking lot to her left...across on-coming traffic because she swerved left.

quote:

---

Everything would have come out in court had there been mistakes, and it's very likely fault would have been distributed across two drivers.

---

Impossible. Two people CANNOT be responsible for one crash!!! Lacy didn’t even get hit!!! 73 yards away!!!! Funyuns is a woman driver (probably Asian too)!!!! Cops are corrupt!!!!

quote:

---

You are not a crash scene, forensic expert. Did you go to the scene and measure skid marks? Did you go to the scene with a terrestrial laser scanner to document the accident scene. Did you interview the witnesses? Did you recreate the scene?

---

How about, rather than doing the whole “trust the experts” bs, you actually point out what he has wrong? There is video of the crash. And there are aerial maps of that specific area. You don’t have to be an expert to do what the OP did to put those things together.

quote:

---

All of you people dissecting this as if you know more than the LSP are idiots. An attorney selects bits and pieces of videos and you fall for it.

---

You act like we should just take LSP’s statement on this as gospel. Yet we also know that they coerced a witness to lie in their statement, shown on body camera.

quote:

---

Everything would have come out in court had there been mistakes,

---

what? Tell that to the guy that was put on death row for the Yogurt shop murders because of a coerced confession.

Your first sentence; not even possible for her to have seen that......etc. is really the first I have seen that makes any sense. She is behind the white truck so how could she see KL's car in the wrong lane. When the truck pulled over and the proper lane exposed how much time did she have to react to the truck pulling over and swerve into the oncoming lane. Regardless of anyone's feelings on this it seems only in a court of law would the actual details be exposed, right, wrong or indifferent.

quote:

---

Why are some of y’all acting like this is so unheard of? I’m not saying it isn’t stupid, but it is incredibly plausible.

---

Plausible when you realize her imminent threat was the truck in front if her…

Stop playing detective and wait for all the facts to come to light. You cannot say anything other than an opinion. Nothing either side is presenting is all the facts. They are both doing their jobs to present their side. Stop falling for it and just wait for all the facts to play out.

The world is constantly trying to rush to the finish line to be first to say something. Which misleads the public and spews anger and confusion. This entire situation is tragic but I am tired of hearing people bash both sides without speaking from a position of knowledge.

quote:

---

The case is dropped.....

---

So that means we need to rush and blame one side or the other despite having all the facts based upon a video released by one side or the other? Lord. No the entire situation is tragic and again need to stop playing detectives. With time more and more information will be released/revealed.

So the white car hit the grey car head on and supposedly it's the green cars fault?

quote:

---

DINGDINGDING WE HAVE A WINNER. Thank you for stating this.

Literally thousands of people are not grasping this concept. It’s comparative negligence, or shared fault. Just because A is true (KL driving recklessly in the wrong lane and too fast which made the gold driver panic), doesn’t mean b Isn’t true (Funyuns is an idiot and went left of center)

---

Are there people that are really denying lacy had anything to do with the wreck?

The lady should've at most swerved into the right lane and hit the truck. You never swerve into oncoming traffic. But yes lacy started the events so he is somewhat culpable. 1

quote:

---

On the tailgate of the black vehicle in the satellite images

---

Thank you for your response. Respectfully, I do not think that is possible.

Take a look at the LSP capture from the moment of the accident:


In it, you can clearly see, from right to left, the south end of Island 1, all of Island 2, and most of Island 3. The sign for Rapids Wash 'N Roll is in Island 3. The accident is to the left of that sign.

Based on this and the approximate location of the camera at Go Bear's, we can project a triangle of possible locations for the collision:


Here is a screen capture from the LSP video showing the body camera of the responding officer as he gets out of his cruiser:


Note that the incident is alongside the ditch area on the left, between the parking lots for Dollar General and the restaurant. That's south of Entrance D on my diagram. If the collision was near the black truck in the Google image, it would be much closer to the sign for the restaurant.

For these reasons and others, I think that my location of the collision is correct.

Thank you for checking me on that. Cheers.