- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/11/25 at 9:09 pm to lsupride87
quote:
When he was being a belligerent drunk and she kept the family together
What about when she was facing her own addiction issues in Mandeville while he was coaching in BR?
Posted on 7/11/25 at 9:11 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Good luck fighting back with the same court that ruled 5-2 against you. Rehearing grants are rare. Especially when you have to change 2 votes in your favor
Posted on 7/11/25 at 9:12 pm to spslayto
Ed is broke
Posted on 7/11/25 at 9:32 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
I hope he wins. She doesn’t deserve half of that money.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 9:34 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Why not?
Maybe you can explain to me how legally she should be entitled to future wages. I don’t care if he was a belligerent drunk or what role she played in their family. I’m a divorce attorney and this new filing is 100% right. That ruling made no sense under the law.
This post was edited on 7/11/25 at 9:36 pm
Posted on 7/11/25 at 9:37 pm to lsupride87
quote:
He earned that buyout while married though
No he didn’t.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 9:37 pm to moneyg
quote:
Do you believe that spouse is entitled to half of money earned after divorce because a contract is signed during marriage?
Seems to me that is essentially the ruling the court made. It’s an interesting thought exercise though.
If the contract was fully guaranteed, then when was the money actually “earned.” I think an argument could be made that it was essentially earned when the contract was signed regardless of the payout structure.
Maybe that’s the case her lawyers made, maybe not. I really don’t know.
It’d be a whole other question as to if that’s fair.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 9:38 pm to paper tiger
quote:
Adding 20 law firms doesnt bolster the argument.
Depends on who they are and how politically connected they are
Posted on 7/11/25 at 9:43 pm to Wayne Campbell
quote:
If the contract was fully guaranteed, then when was the money actually “earned.” I think an argument could be made that it was essentially earned when the contract was signed regardless of the payout structure.
I’d also pose the question, had he been fired for cause with no buyout, does she argue he dissipated the estate and ask for a judgment of what his buyout would have been.
With this ruling, Saints and Pelicans players need to think long and hard about signing extensions
Posted on 7/11/25 at 10:07 pm to lsupride87
quote:
He earned that buyout while married though
The buyout was for future work. He hadn’t earned it yet.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 10:30 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Like it or not, she's getting half. She was there the entire time, so she gets half of the pie! Not saying it's fair, but welcome to divorce court where men are treated like second class citizens.
The first time I met with my attorney, the first thing he said was unless you can prove your wife is a prostitute or crackhead, she's getting the kids! Sadly, he was right!
O doesn't stand a chance!
The first time I met with my attorney, the first thing he said was unless you can prove your wife is a prostitute or crackhead, she's getting the kids! Sadly, he was right!
O doesn't stand a chance!
Posted on 7/11/25 at 10:31 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
application for rehearing
lol denied. Those are practically never granted at any level to the extent that I’m not even sure why they exist procedurally.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 10:44 pm to DBG
so because he doesn't want to hand his ex wife 8 million dollars, that means hes broke? hes not broke,he doesn't have any wild purchases that I've seen ,hes hooking up with women from south Louisiana they dont have high class tastes.
Posted on 7/12/25 at 5:22 am to lsufball19
quote:
With this ruling, Saints and Pelicans players need to think long and hard about signing extensions
How does it work today? Let’s say I am a design engineer that works on the team, hell, the ones that leads the team to design the new MS River Bridge. I get divorced and ordered to pay the exact same structure as O.
If the project runs behind schedule and over budget, extending my contract and payments, would I have to pay my ex of this new extension?
Posted on 7/12/25 at 6:30 am to Oilfieldbiology
Being an LSU fan, I went through a lot of pain and suffering in 2000 & 2001. I feel I should get a couple of thousand at least for that.
Posted on 7/12/25 at 6:36 am to JRook
I’m not gonna pretend to know what happened in his marriage like some others but I’ll say that the way he screwed LSU by literally hiring all his family and buddies to any position he possibly could and then laughed about “give me my check and tell me what door to go out of”…..yea how anyone could defend him is beyond me.
Posted on 7/12/25 at 7:18 am to moneyg
quote:
Is it your understanding that a spouse is entitled to half of everything earned even after a marriage ends?
The Louisiana Supreme Court says so.
quote:
Do you believe that spouse is entitled to half of money earned after divorce because a contract is signed during marriage?
Yes, unless there is some type of fraud involved.
This post was edited on 7/12/25 at 7:22 am
Posted on 7/12/25 at 7:38 am to turnpiketiger
quote:
He will be back coaching DL before long. It’s coming just watch.
Agreed, he'll likely be coaching D-Line next year. And it's really who he is.....a D-Line coach and nothing wrong with that.
Posted on 7/12/25 at 8:14 am to lsupride87
quote:
Why not? When he was being a belligerent drunk and she kept the family together and his life from shambles thus allowing his career to continue is a big part of him getting to earning that buyout
Pure emotion no legal reasoning, thanks
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News