Started By
Message

re: Offseason thread: Should Guice be put back into the LSU record books?

Posted on 1/13/25 at 11:04 am to
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
27852 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 11:04 am to
Every major sports HoF and countless record books are littered with POSs. Did LSU give up the money they made off of Guice?

He’s probably a shitbag, but it doesn’t change the fact that he was good on the field.
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
44376 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 11:07 am to
quote:

Is it not cancel culture to remove his stats? I’m just asking if you have an opinion one way or another.
Honestly, I don't really care one way or another. I was just wondering why it's important to you. (not knocking you, just curious)
Posted by Pelican fan99
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Jun 2013
37654 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 11:21 am to
Of course they should. Removing someone’s on the field accomplishment for off the field stuff that had nothing to do with football is incredibly dumb
Posted by Tiger in Gatorland
Moonshine Holler
Member since Sep 2006
9469 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 11:28 am to
What makes me sadder than anything, is I swear guys like Charles Scott and Joseph Addai just played a few years ago.
Posted by tigerbaiter
Member since Dec 2006
502 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 11:33 am to
Never should have been removed.
Posted by tigerbaiter
Member since Dec 2006
502 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 11:35 am to
Even more ridiculous
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
37836 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 11:40 am to
quote:

What makes me sadder than anything, is I swear guys like Charles Scott and Joseph Addai just played a few years ago.


I remember Kevin Faulk like it was yesterday

My oldest daughter knew Alley Broussard in elementary school. She'll 42 this year.

Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
21773 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 11:43 am to
quote:

Yes, a record is a record regardless of what the player went on to do afterwards. It would be another story if it was found he was using illegal PEDs or something helped achieve the record.

This is where I stand on the matter...

Put his records back in the book. I don't really care if he was nice or horrible, this stuff is about what he accomplished on the field.

Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
9677 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

It seems to me like LSU is trying to have it both ways. I understand that what Guice did was pretty bad(which may be a bit of an understatement) but does it nullify his stats? And if it does why does LSU show them at all?


I think they do it to acknowledge that those performances did happen.
so the performances themselves were never wiped from existence.

just Guice himself doesn't get the satisfaction of seeing this name on paper.
or from the victim's stand point they get to know his name isn't there.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
33179 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 12:35 pm to
Removing records (or wins), whether it be team or personal, is really stupid. The games he played in happened, so yes, his stats should appear in the record books.
Posted by paulb52
Member since Dec 2019
5819 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 12:39 pm to
Who? Never heard of him.
Posted by markthetiger99
Member since Oct 2022
384 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 12:46 pm to
It’s not up to us. It’s up to the university who they let represent the school in the record book. They obviously felt his actions were despicable enough to not represent LSU athletics in the record book. Not sure why we are debating this
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
9677 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 1:01 pm to
quote:


Removing records (or wins), whether it be team or personal, is really stupid. The games he played in happened, so yes, his stats should appear in the record books.


the records are still there.
his name is just no longer attached to them.

for example, his 2nd half against Arkansas in 2016 is still the most yards in 1 half of football in LSU history.
if you want to have your name at number 1, you have to beat his 219 yards because that IS the record.
LSU just does not officially acknowledge the name of the person that set that record.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
33179 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

LSU just does not officially acknowledge the name of the person that set that record.

Equally silly to me
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
57823 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 1:25 pm to
He’s a pos but I think it’s silly to take his name out of the record books.

I wonder what he’s doing for money/income now.

He didn’t make a ton in the nfl and had to pay some settlements, and that was years ago now.
Posted by Akit1
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2006
7983 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 1:27 pm to
Shouldn’t remove stats. Then it’s slippery slope.

Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
32054 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

It’s not about “breaking” the law.
Billy Cannon’s crimes aren’t comparable at all.


quote:

Becoming involved in a counterfeiting scheme, he printed $6 million in U.S. 100-dollar bills, some of which he stored in ice chests buried in the back yard of a house he owned and rented out. Charged along with five others, he served two-and-a-half years of a five-year sentence at the Federal Correctional Institution, Texarkana.


quote:

Rape & sexual misconduct allegations for Guice while he was at LSU & LSU was named in the lawsuit.


In Jim logic it's not that big of a deal to be CONVICTED of printing $6 million dollars in counterfeit money. You just can't be ALLEGED, not proven, to have raped someone.

Conviction of a federal crime = statue in front of the stadium
Unproven allegations of a crime in a civil lawsuit = name permanently disassociated with on-field performances.

I'm not saying Guice is a good guy or didn't do what he's accused of doing. But none of it was proven in a court of law like Cannon's crimes were (he pleaded guilty). I'm also not saying Cannon shouldn't have a statute. But save us the hypocrisy in arguing that it's ok for a convicted felon to be honored but not a guy who has never been a convicted felon.
Posted by JimTiger72
Member since Jun 2023
11425 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 1:42 pm to
You can’t seem to grasp the pretty simple concept that one of them INVOLVES LSU & one doesn’t.

LSU is trying to remove themselves from any association with Guice for their own sake as much as they are trying to “punish” Guice
This post was edited on 1/13/25 at 1:45 pm
Posted by tigersbb
Member since Oct 2012
11661 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 1:43 pm to
quote:


It’s not up to us. It’s up to the university who they let represent the school in the record book. They obviously felt his actions were despicable enough to not represent LSU athletics in the record boo


Has Big Baby been removed form the basketball record book?
Posted by El Jefe de Tu Mama
Over there by that place
Member since Dec 2024
406 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 1:43 pm to
You do not remove players from record books. I was at the game when Guice ran for nearly 300 yards against Texas A&M. It happened, we all saw it. If you want to disassociate someone from the school due to behavior, such as banning them from games and the campus, or not mentioning them anymore, fine. But taking names from record books is stupid.
This post was edited on 1/13/25 at 1:44 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram