
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Not A Big Colin Cowherd Fan, But He Nails it Here Regarding LSU
Posted on 9/14/26 at 10:41 pm
Posted on 9/14/26 at 10:41 pm
"LSU is Big Boy football "
Short clip.
Short clip.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 11:19 pm to KCT
Lane has some things that fit really well with LSU. One is an offensive approach that has some NFL to it, identifying mismatches. Then he has also been heavily influenced by Saban, who was core to LSU becoming what Cowherd names as one of the 6-8. But that's not just guaranteed. No playoff berth since 2019-20.
As far as hijinks, I don't know what exactly he's talking about. He was going by what was decided in court on the eligibility issue.
As far as hijinks, I don't know what exactly he's talking about. He was going by what was decided in court on the eligibility issue.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 11:30 pm to inadaze
quote:
As far as hijinks, I don't know what exactly he's talking about.
I believe he meant it as a compliment. He was saying that LSU was one of a few schools that don't need gimmicks in order to be watchable. Like he said, he watches LSU simply because of the "talent."
Posted on 9/14/26 at 11:37 pm to KCT
First off, cowherd knows zilch about college football. He covers it because he has to. I'd be surprised if he watch 5 games a year.
Given what he's said, LSU has been super for 5 years now. I don't think lane is trying a schtick. I think he's bring an attitude that other coaches have lacked.
Those top 6 teams he's talked about, UGA, UT, ND, Ohio State, and throw in Bama...have all gone long periods of time without winning anything. Heck UT and ND are 20+ years without an NC.
Even the biggest programs need an edge. Maybe not for viewership, but to win it all.
Given what he's said, LSU has been super for 5 years now. I don't think lane is trying a schtick. I think he's bring an attitude that other coaches have lacked.
Those top 6 teams he's talked about, UGA, UT, ND, Ohio State, and throw in Bama...have all gone long periods of time without winning anything. Heck UT and ND are 20+ years without an NC.
Even the biggest programs need an edge. Maybe not for viewership, but to win it all.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 11:55 pm to KCT
No, I mean about "hijinks" in relation to Lane.
The LSU talent thing, yeah, he has been saying that for years.
The LSU talent thing, yeah, he has been saying that for years.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 12:02 am to KCT
He should've told Spurrier that at UF. There's a reason Lane too wears a visor.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 2:55 am to KCT
What Colin doesn't acknowledge here is that for whatever reason, players love Lane and his schtick. He's one of the last celebrity coaches and kids want to play for him. So I'm good with it.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 4:12 am to KCT
People are always trying to change CLK. He is what he is. Let him Coach.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:24 am to KCT
I think you're misreading his message. He's talking shite about Lane.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:30 am to KCT
It is big boy football, but you need someone to work the margins. That is the difference now. The margin for error on talent mis-evals is very small. The devil is truly in the details as the delta between rosters shrinks. The better someone is at augmenting top end talent with ham and eggers, the better the chances to win enough games to get a shot at taking home the prize. Then you have to have a brain trust that knows how to use those players and scheme around deficiencies, either your own or the other guys. Not as simple as he says.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:16 am to KCT
I'm glad we have both now. We get to have big boy, smashmouth, football on the field AND we get to enjoy these media clickbait drama whores and opposing fanbases lose their damn minds every time our coach opens his mouth...very entertaining.

Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:20 am to KCT
Shtick and no talent or talent and not Shtick... well how about Shtick and Talent Colin. 
Posted on 9/15/26 at 9:14 am to KCT
he's implying there's a schtick this year at lsu. what's that schtick?
Posted on 9/15/26 at 9:18 am to faraway
quote:
he's implying there's a schtick this year at lsu. what's that schtick?
I think he’s implying there’s no point in what LK did in trying to get those players who went to mini camps back as LSU is already loaded. I personally agree with that and didn’t see the point in doing all this. But I’m not losing sleep over it at the end of the day as it was ruled legal and everyone else is doing it.
This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 9:19 am
Posted on 9/15/26 at 9:31 am to BigPapiDoesItAgain
Lane’s formula is simple- the schtick is for the recruits and national hype. The big-boy football is for the fans and winning games.
Very simple, I don’t know how Cowherd doesn’t get it.
Very simple, I don’t know how Cowherd doesn’t get it.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 9:41 am to KCT
quote:
Not A Big Colin Cowherd Fan,
Not a big one???? I’m not even in the least one. frick off retard
Posted on 9/15/26 at 9:56 am to HarryHoudini
quote:
he's implying there's a schtick this year at lsu. what's that schtick?
Agreed What schtick?
quote:
I think he’s implying there’s no point in what LK did in trying to get those players who went to mini camps back as LSU is already loaded.
The players took the legal action, not LSU. Of course LSU stood to benefit from it. But LSU nor Kiffin were directly involved (at least from a legal perspective). Schools/coaches all across the country, in multiple sports, have for several years now been pushing the boundaries of eligibility in order to have good players available to play. Generally through the court system. Hell, Ole Miss's QB is one such player. Did LSU "need" those players? Maybe not. But that's what good coaches do. They always try to push the boundaries to improve their team anyway they can.
The ONLY reason it turned into a big issue is because the SEC and other conferences think they have found the secret weapon to stop all of the litigation in the lawsuit the Big 12 filed against Texas Tech in June. The conferences turned it into a circus. Not Lane
As for Cowherd, the basis for his opinion is faulty. He says/implies he watched Ole Miss because of Lane's schtick. No...he watched Ole Miss because they were winning. Lane could have done all of the same exact things and if Ole Miss was 4-8, 5-7, 6-6, no one would have watched. So maybe the "schtick" was part of what led to the winning.
Brian Kelly subscribe to the same faulty logic Cowherd is advocating. He assumed LSU won big by virtue of its own existence and that the HC had to give minimal effort and simply go along for the ride. That wasn't the case. And it isn't the case for ANY program. If it was, then Alabama, Texas, Ohio State, Georgia, etc would win big regardless of the HC. History shows that isn't the case.
If backhanded comments, dunking basketballs, having his nephew spray fog all over the sidelines, pushing boundaries, etc is part of what get his team motivated to win, then do it!
The only time Lane needs to change what he is doing is if it is not producing wins. Until then, do whatever you need to do. I don't care how the sausage is made. Just make it

Popular
Back to top


16









