- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: My take on the 24 team playoffs.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 12:17 pm to TIGERSby10
Posted on 5/26/26 at 12:17 pm to TIGERSby10
quote:
I'd be fine with 8 or the current 12, but anything above 12 is dumb. You can't tell me the 24th ranked team has a shot to run the gambit and win it all. No way that ever happens.
I agree. To me anything past 8 is a waste of time.
It's all about that money though.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 12:50 pm to boweswi05
I wouldn't mind 16 teams, no byes, 1st game at home of higher ranked team.
Teams picked by a computer (BCS style) with no auto bids.
Teams picked by a computer (BCS style) with no auto bids.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:05 pm to Bayou_Bengal44
meh. Baseball has 64 teams that get in the playoffs. Basketball is now up to 76. I am not a fan of 24, bc I don't think anyone should get a bye. It's not really an advantage. The higher seeds should get to host and that is their advantage.
How many of you pull for underdogs in march madness or the baseball tourney? I do. I wouldn't be upset with pulling for an underdog in the football playoffs.
The shitty part about limiting the football field to 4 or 8 is that many years, the #5 or even #9 team has a shot at making a run. There is also too much human bias in the selection process to assume they will pick the right team. I'm less concerned about the feeling of the #17 team getting left out than I am about the #5 team.
How many of you pull for underdogs in march madness or the baseball tourney? I do. I wouldn't be upset with pulling for an underdog in the football playoffs.
The shitty part about limiting the football field to 4 or 8 is that many years, the #5 or even #9 team has a shot at making a run. There is also too much human bias in the selection process to assume they will pick the right team. I'm less concerned about the feeling of the #17 team getting left out than I am about the #5 team.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:07 pm to Bayou_Bengal44
Money Money Money
Ain't about safety. Ain't about the fan.
Ain't about safety. Ain't about the fan.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:07 pm to Bayou_Bengal44
I’ll play devils advocate. How far do yall think some of Les Miles teams could have gone had we had a 12 or 24 team playoff?
Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:14 pm to Bayou_Bengal44
It will take away from the big time regular season games because teams won’t have to worry about winning as much. They will start resting players, guys will start half assing because, why risk getting hurt and end up missing the playoffs? We will get in at 8-4 so it’s all good. That’s the mentality that it will create and it’s bad for the greatest college sport.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:27 pm to sta4ever
quote:
I’ll play devils advocate. How far do yall think some of Les Miles teams could have gone had we had a 12 or 24 team playoff?
I would have loved to watch it. With an 8 team playoff, Miles probably would have reached the playoffs 4 times. With a 16-team playoff, he would have made the playoffs possibly 9 times.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:34 pm to Harry loover
quote:
It will take away from the big time regular season games because teams won’t have to worry about winning as much. They will start resting players, guys will start half assing because, why risk getting hurt and end up missing the playoffs?
That argument was used when they went from 2 to 4 teams, too. You are playing for the higher seed and home-field advantage.
I would argue it's the opposite. We can all agree that no one cares about the bowls anymore. So once a team is eliminated from the playoffs, those are the players and teams that will phone it in. In a 4-team playoff, that only leaves a handful of teams actually giving a shite at the end of the season. But if you had 16 spots, the final weekend could still have 20+ teams trying to better their record for seeding and playing for those last few spots. More teams in the playoffs would equal more teams playing the full season.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:46 pm to Bayou_Bengal44
How about keeping 12, or reduce to 10, and take the true top 10-12 teams and not include so called “champions” of some weak conference.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:47 pm to Bayou_Bengal44
quote:
We need to go back to BCS where teams had to work there arse off to make it not just get a pass
You can work your arse off to make it and still not (ask Florida State 2023). That’s why it changed, and for the better.
Screw the BCS and the old fart purists who never wanted any sort of change to begin with but still forget they hated the BCS. Playoff’s 24 teams now. Good. Get over it.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:49 pm to Alt26
quote:
24 teams is far too many and it does nothing but dilute the regular season and the playoffs themselves
Complete lie
Posted on 5/26/26 at 2:35 pm to Sleepy_Tiger
Yay 4 square time at recess today!
Posted on 5/26/26 at 2:36 pm to Bayou_Bengal44
Disagree. More playoffs games means more interested fans and prestige for more teams. Bowl games are trash.
This post was edited on 5/26/26 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 5/26/26 at 2:42 pm to LSUDonMCO
quote:\
I wouldn't mind 16 teams, no byes, 1st game at home of higher ranked team.
Teams picked by a computer (BCS style) with no auto bids.
This. I've been saying that since the start. I never liked the idea of a bye for the college teams, so I always hated the 12 team playoff. I figured they'd jump to 16/no byes, but what the hell?!? Straight to 24?
Anyway, as they say, it is what it is. But as Zeppelin says, now it'll be "what is and what should never be".
Posted on 5/26/26 at 2:48 pm to Nix to Twillie
quote:
Complete lie
Sure it does. By its nature it has to.
Right now with 12 teams the field is comprised of team with only 1 or 2 losses. That's fine. But if you expand to 24 you're bringing in teams with 3 losses, and the potential for 4 losses under the right circumstances. Yes, on the one hand it keeps more teams in the CFP hunt longer (which some would argue isn't necessarily a bad thing) but it also dilutes one of the aspects which separated college football from every other sport. That is the magnitude of the individual regular season games with so few spots available in the playoffs.
There is a way to strike a healthy balance. IMO, 2 was too few. As was 4. 12 is fine. But if you want to go to 16 to create some symmetry I can go along with it. 24 though is unnecessary. Particularly when there is such a growing gap between major conf. programs and G6 (or whatever they are non) conferences
Posted on 5/26/26 at 2:55 pm to Bayou_Bengal44
it needs to be the top 8, no byes, 4 P4 champs and 4 at large. Seed them and let them play.
Trying to distinguish between 6-8 will be hard, but not nearly as murky as 12-24.
Trying to distinguish between 6-8 will be hard, but not nearly as murky as 12-24.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 3:03 pm to Bayou_Bengal44
No use getting riled up about it now, it’s over. What’s sad is the people who supported what led to this and now hate it still don’t understand what happened.
This post was edited on 5/26/26 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 5/26/26 at 3:07 pm to Bayou_Bengal44
The sport was better when it was less accessible. The leaders of the sport are working hard to make everything very easy to access and understand for the casual fan. On its face, the 24 team playoff is fantastic. More postseason competition, lots of entertaining matchups, and a champion crowned directly on the field. What the casual fan does not / cannot comprehend is what is being lost:
Less meaningful regular season.
With 24 teams making the tournament, the elite teams are virtually guaranteed a spot. Yes, the regular season games can still be entertaining and the players will still play hard and want to win. But, the key difference there is that while they want to win, they won't actually have to win to avoid being at risk of reaching the playoff. The absolute desperation of the regular season is gone.
Genuinely meaningless bowl games.
This will fall on deaf ears for casual fans, but bowl games used to be a lot of fun and competitive. Reaching the Sugar Bowl, the Cotton Bowl, or even the damn Capital One Bowl was a really fun way to cap off a solid year. It was a moment to say "this season we came up a bit short, but this is our last chance to get to see a lot of these guys play, and we still had a damn good year."
Winning those games would actually create a lot of momentum going into the offseason and following year - look at how the 2006 Sugar Bowl, the 2010 Cotton Bowl, and the 2018 Peach Bowl carried to the next year. Whooped arse in a big bowl game on big stages, and it resulted in 3 teams that came into the next season with a lot of swagger and belief in themselves. Instead, 23 of the top 24 teams in college football will end the season with a loss. Think about Vanderbilt this past year - they had an amazing season by Vandy standards, but because of this culture that's been created that it's playoffs or bust, they ended the season in disappointment rather than going to something like the Orange Bowl and potentially capping things off with a statement win.
Watered down games.
Yes, the 24 team playoff would create exciting matchups and inevitably some all time classic finishes, but at some point, I'll just feel numb to the big moments because there will simply be too many big moments. I don't even care that 17 seeded Iowa went on the road and upset 16 seeded Utah because there's just too much to follow.
Less meaningful regular season.
With 24 teams making the tournament, the elite teams are virtually guaranteed a spot. Yes, the regular season games can still be entertaining and the players will still play hard and want to win. But, the key difference there is that while they want to win, they won't actually have to win to avoid being at risk of reaching the playoff. The absolute desperation of the regular season is gone.
Genuinely meaningless bowl games.
This will fall on deaf ears for casual fans, but bowl games used to be a lot of fun and competitive. Reaching the Sugar Bowl, the Cotton Bowl, or even the damn Capital One Bowl was a really fun way to cap off a solid year. It was a moment to say "this season we came up a bit short, but this is our last chance to get to see a lot of these guys play, and we still had a damn good year."
Winning those games would actually create a lot of momentum going into the offseason and following year - look at how the 2006 Sugar Bowl, the 2010 Cotton Bowl, and the 2018 Peach Bowl carried to the next year. Whooped arse in a big bowl game on big stages, and it resulted in 3 teams that came into the next season with a lot of swagger and belief in themselves. Instead, 23 of the top 24 teams in college football will end the season with a loss. Think about Vanderbilt this past year - they had an amazing season by Vandy standards, but because of this culture that's been created that it's playoffs or bust, they ended the season in disappointment rather than going to something like the Orange Bowl and potentially capping things off with a statement win.
Watered down games.
Yes, the 24 team playoff would create exciting matchups and inevitably some all time classic finishes, but at some point, I'll just feel numb to the big moments because there will simply be too many big moments. I don't even care that 17 seeded Iowa went on the road and upset 16 seeded Utah because there's just too much to follow.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 3:22 pm to TIGERSby10
quote:
I'd be fine with 8 or the current 12, but anything above 12 is dumb. You can't tell me the 24th ranked team has a shot to run the gamut and win it all. No way that ever happens.
I agree with your conclusion, but disagree with your reasoning. You could make the same argument for a smaller basketball and baseball post season with your argument.
Popular
Back to top



1






