
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Maybe it is time to change quarterbacks?
Posted on 10/12/26 at 11:12 pm
Posted on 10/12/26 at 11:12 pm
Maybe the quarterback we have and we got is not what he’s supposed to be? We all see what he is and he makes horrible decisions when he’s stressed! Maybe it’s time to go with the 2nd string?
Posted on 10/12/26 at 11:15 pm to Kat7611
Not at this time my friend.
If you’re being serious, I will try to answer.
He’s had some pretty great moments and lost two games by an average of 4.5 points.
He’s the combo of run and pass that lane wants.
I do think Husan and Landon are good quarterbacks that will certainly compete next year.
But all you have tn do is look back tk last year. Van Buren was NOT a good #2
If you’re being serious, I will try to answer.
He’s had some pretty great moments and lost two games by an average of 4.5 points.
He’s the combo of run and pass that lane wants.
I do think Husan and Landon are good quarterbacks that will certainly compete next year.
But all you have tn do is look back tk last year. Van Buren was NOT a good #2
Posted on 10/12/26 at 11:53 pm to dstone12
quote:
do think Husan and Landon are good quarterbacks that will certainly compete next year.
They will never start, Lane will find a shiny new toy and over pay. Apparently that is they way now.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 1:30 am to UnoMe
quote:
Lane will find a shiny new toy and over pay. Apparently that is they way now.
And if he doesn't and our current backups don't work out, this board will be filled with posts complaining that he didn't go get a top QB in the portal.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 6:25 am to UnoMe
quote:
They will never start, Lane will find a shiny new toy and over pay. Apparently that is they way now.
Corral and Dart both made big strides in year 2 under Lane.
Expect the same from Sam Leavitt.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 6:33 am to Kat7611
No lol
Go watch the McNeese game.
You guys sometimes need to accept the fact that you’re clueless about these things. Just stop.
Go watch the McNeese game.
You guys sometimes need to accept the fact that you’re clueless about these things. Just stop.
This post was edited on 10/13/26 at 6:35 am
Posted on 10/13/26 at 6:35 am to Kat7611
lol
Our fan base is full of people who don’t know what they are seeing.
Our fan base is full of people who don’t know what they are seeing.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 6:35 am to dstone12
Defense and offensive line were the problem against Kentucky.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 6:38 am to UnoMe
quote:
They will never start, Lane will find a shiny new toy and over pay. Apparently that is they way now
Nothing like calling for the coach to change QBs while simultaneously criticizing the same coach for looking for a new shiny toy rather than developing those on the roster.
Retard
Posted on 10/13/26 at 6:38 am to Kat7611
You think? It’s been obvious since the ole miss game.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 6:47 am to backbone
quote:I asked you this in another thread and you couldn’t answer with anything other than “let’s do something different.” What have you seen that makes you believe any of the other guys will do better? You gave absolutely nothing. You can’t just make a change because it’s a change. We still have to try and win every game. We still have an outside shot at the playoffs. And even if we didn’t, we still have to be in games. What you’re saying is certifiably insane. You refuse to acknowledge the Mcneese game. You refuse to say why you think they can do better. Just stop. They’re not going to sit a QB because you don’t like them
You think? It’s been obvious since the ole miss game.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 6:48 am to abellsujr
Look, a change is what’s needed. We may not have a better option I don’t know? But damn, let’s try something different and see how it works.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 6:51 am to backbone
No lol. Go watch the McNeese game. Clark couldn’t hit anything. Longstreet had some flashes. But if they don’t give a better chance, you don’t make the change, that’s not how it works. Unless we’re getting destroyed. Then maybe you try and throw shite on the wall. We are not there. Just stop. It’s insane.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 6:51 am to Kat7611
Holy crap! It’s NOT the Quarterback! Our backup is the LITE version of our starter.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 6:52 am to abellsujr
The shite you’re talking about that needs to be thrown in the trash is one look and run out of bounds leavitt
Posted on 10/13/26 at 6:53 am to backbone
You’re not making any sense once again. Giving nothing of value. Just spitting one liners. Give facts. Numbers. Information. Have you watched the Mcneese game? What are you talking about? 
Posted on 10/13/26 at 7:48 am to Kat7611
If the production was the same it was during the Ole Miss first half then the answer would be yes with the amount of turnovers. But he has been a lot more productive in the passing game since then. So the answer would be no. Now he does need to eliminate the turnovers but if we are being honest he is still learning how to play QB from the pocket.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 8:41 am to backbone
quote:
Look, a change is what’s needed. We may not have a better option I don’t know? But damn, let’s try something different and see how it works
Sorry, you said “we” but I can’t tell if you’re referring to LSU or that dogshit program you root for in StarkVegas
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:57 am to John Rambeaux
lol I’m an lsu and state fan

Popular
Back to top

11








