- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU # 2 in Passing Offense and # 105 in Rushing Offense.. Pigs have flown
Posted on 9/15/19 at 6:29 pm to Howyouluhdat
Posted on 9/15/19 at 6:29 pm to Howyouluhdat
We can run the ball. But we can throw better. We can put up a shite ton of points on anyone
1
Posted on 9/15/19 at 6:30 pm to JohnnyU
quote:
How do you know if he’s the best in this offense if we haven’t seen the others in like scenarios?
The coaches have seen them all...they probably know more about football than anyone posting on here. I guess maybe y’all think they can’t evaluate who should start?
Posted on 9/15/19 at 7:28 pm to Ltown_tiger
quote:
t ain’t all CEH man. Our line is having some trouble with run blocking.
Stop this crap! I seen Clyde miss many holes last night with his tippy toeing & bad vision
Posted on 9/15/19 at 7:33 pm to Ltown_tiger
quote:
Oline run blocking
Considering the competition to date, this worries me. D lines are going to get much bigger and better. Fla, aub, bama are some good examples
Posted on 9/15/19 at 7:37 pm to Kikicaca
quote:
you need to study up on football
This is the argument people on this board resort to when they run out of good arguments to make.
Posted on 9/15/19 at 7:42 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
The coaches have seen them all...they probably know more about football than anyone posting on here. I guess maybe y’all think they can’t evaluate who should start?
Coaches are no different than anyone else, particularly managers, who become biased or become tunnel visioned. They can misevaluate players, overlook talent or make what are perceived to be safer choices.
For example, it has been said that Microsoft lost their mojo and allowed Apple and Google to become bigger players because they didn't recognize or acknowledge their young talent and allow that talent to innovate. They played it safe.
Posted on 9/15/19 at 7:44 pm to JohnnyU
Yep, and as long as opposing defenses are vulnerable to it, we'll keep right on doing it. We certainly aren't opposed to running the ball, and we are going to run the ball as Joe Brady sees fit.
Posted on 9/15/19 at 7:50 pm to JohnnyU
Cholly Mac’s not walking through that door boys.
This post was edited on 9/15/19 at 8:01 pm
Posted on 9/15/19 at 7:58 pm to JohnnyU
What a time to be alive. Betting right now that the rushing O vastly improves. Top 30-40 rushing O and only that low bc of the pass heavy O.
Posted on 9/15/19 at 8:04 pm to JohnnyU
Love it
Posted on 9/15/19 at 8:32 pm to JohnnyU
If we can get the running game breaking big plays with the room the pass attack is bringing we will have a great season.
Posted on 9/15/19 at 8:39 pm to HubbaBubba
Pretty easy when you’re playing community colleges in your first few weeks.
Posted on 9/15/19 at 8:40 pm to Ltown_tiger
Sorry, but I saw both Clyde and Davis-Price run against the same D and came away more impressed with Davis-Price even with fewer carries. Small sample size, but he looked to be the bruiser that best compliments our passing attack.
And honestly it was Emery who I thought would show the most, but Saturday it wasn’t.
And honestly it was Emery who I thought would show the most, but Saturday it wasn’t.
This post was edited on 9/15/19 at 8:42 pm
Posted on 9/15/19 at 8:42 pm to SickGainzLP
quote:So here's the question: is the combination of #2 passing and #105 rushing acceptable to the coaching staff? It could be. At what point does an abundance of one offset the shortcomings of the other and be declared "OK"?
LSU # 2 in Passing Offense and # 105 in Rushing Offense
Theoretically, if we passed for 700 YPG with a suspect running game, would that be OK? When do you get so good at one that balance becomes a moot point?
Posted on 9/15/19 at 8:50 pm to sunnydaze
quote:
Rather have a beast passing attack any day over a running game
I’d like a little more balance. Not necessarily 50/50 but I’d just like to know that if we have a game where JB is off, we can still line up and pound the other team into submission
Posted on 9/15/19 at 8:55 pm to tigerpawl
For me to answer to that comes down to what the reason is. Are we ranked 105 rushing because our pass is unstoppable vs top teams and we don't need to be balanced? Ok.
Do we struggle to run when we have to in close games against top teams? Not ok.
You feel me?
Do we struggle to run when we have to in close games against top teams? Not ok.
You feel me?
Posted on 9/15/19 at 9:02 pm to SickGainzLP
quote:So far. GASO, TX, NSU. Buckle up, butter cup.
Are we ranked 105 rushing because our pass is unstoppable vs top teams and we don't need to be balanced?
Posted on 9/15/19 at 9:56 pm to tigerpawl
So far so good you are right. Sec schedule starts soon tho my guy
Posted on 9/15/19 at 10:11 pm to tigerpawl
well in theory it is probably fine if you are throwing for 700 a game. The downside of becoming 1 dimensional is that when you become predictable it becomes easier to stop. but if you are throwing for tons of yards regardless it doesnt matter as long as you are scoring and not turning it over.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News