Started By
Message

re: Live hearing thread

Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:42 pm to
Posted by extremetigerfanatic
Member since Oct 2003
6014 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

That second sentence is just made up. Any appellate circuit could just simply vacate the order and the underlying injunction, rule that the SEC could enforce its rule retroactively, and allow the penalties.

That doesn’t make any sense. Can I watch you take a free umbrella rain bag from in front of a store today. Then get the legislature to pass a law that umbrella bags are illegal and you cannot have them tomorrow. Then arrest you next week for what u did yesterday?
No. It’s a bedrock of our legal system.
Posted by w5oer
Pride, LA
Member since Sep 2010
159 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

Lol not even close


Don't forget that guy who lived on the Diversion Canal that f*cked over his employees by stealing thier insurance premiums.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38548 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

And why should we lie down while other schools are signing these players or in ole Miss' case, attempting and failing to sign these players?

But they aren’t. The distinction has been stated.

Which other school has signed a player who executed a contract with an NFL team?
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
17045 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:43 pm to
We have an ole miss grad arguing for lane Kiffin?
Posted by RummelTiger
Official TD Sauces Club Member
Member since Aug 2004
94119 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

We have an ole miss grad arguing for lane Kiffin?


Nobody is arguing "for" Lane.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38548 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

That doesn’t make any sense. Can I watch you take a free umbrella rain bag from in front of a store today. Then get the legislature to pass a law that umbrella bags are illegal and you cannot have them tomorrow. Then arrest you next week for what u did yesterday? No. It’s a bedrock of our legal system.

Perfect example of your ignorance.

First, the SEC isn’t a public body subject to ex post facto prohibitions.

Second, the SEC’s ENTIRE argument is that the rule isn’t new, it’s existing and last weeks memo was a clarification. So if that logic wins, there’s zero argument for a rule being created to punish past behavior.
Posted by JayVegas702
Las Vegas
Member since Oct 2025
830 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

Nobody is arguing "for" Lane.


Somebody gets it
Posted by Red Drum
Coast
Member since Sep 2007
1974 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:44 pm to
In other news, UNC jealous of all the LSU media attention.. reports of fellatio amongst the football team.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted by UnsureTiger
Member since Apr 2023
156 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:45 pm to
Ncaa attorney says the players received their manual when they played and under that manual they exhausted their eligibility.

The new manual says the 5 for 5 rule is prospective not retrospective. These players exhausted their eligibility before the 5 for 5 rule existed.

Brought up the basketball players mentioned one from Louisville and another one and says we can't rewrite the rules based on two players. The rules about professional players would have to be rewritten. Lists many other rules that would have to be rewritten.

Judge interrupted and says "well technically I wouldn't have to do none of that"

Attorney says well you have to use the examples they gave and those examples are not clear. You have to show how the NCAA made those decisions and they didn't do that.

A private association can set their own rules and that's what has been done. As members of the institution they have to follow those rules.

These players are better people because they have gone through this system but their eligibility is over. You can't give them someone else's spot

Judge interrupted again saying that when he was a freshman he took a seniors spot and that putting seniors on a team doesn't mean that they will automatically take someone's spot.

Ncaa says well these are all good players and they will take someone's spot.
Posted by DByrd2
Fredericksburg, VA
Member since Jun 2008
10334 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

Oh, so intangible nonsense with no practical analysis of what actual events would benefit LSU post-judgment.


Not a hateful question here:

Are you intentionally ignoring the potential of focused future attempts at institutional retribution, which have been not-so-subtly indicated as viable by this case and a new federal filing today?

It’s not a new concept that a bully will push you around until you stand up for yourself.

This is classic, albeit poorly veiled, institutional bullying.
Posted by la_birdman
Northern GA via Lake Charles
Member since Feb 2005
32176 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

multiple other teams will be doing this.


They’re doing it now. Which is why this is so ridiculous.

It’s okay if teams A, B and C do it but to single out this other team, for doing the same thing, yet they should be punished for doing it, is ridiculous.

Posted by JayVegas702
Las Vegas
Member since Oct 2025
830 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

In other news, UNC jealous of all the LSU media attention.. reports of fellatio amongst the football team


Was Jordan giving out freebies or was it player on player
Posted by dbowe82
Endzone
Member since Jun 2009
365 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:46 pm to
You’re a fricking idiot and Sankey is a disingenuous facetious piece of shite. That fricking scumbag didn’t even stick around to hear the kids give their testimony. Greg Sankey’s head needs to roll and it needs to roll not next week, not tomorrow, but today.
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
48991 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:46 pm to
Since you ignored this the first time...

quote:

But also stating: Not withdrawing your name from the NFL draft and leaving collegiate athletics also makes them ineligible to return.

That's everyone else that attended ANY minicamps who has returned to date outside of LSU.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 6:47 pm
Posted by CecildaDiesel
Member since Jun 2020
301 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

We have an ole miss grad arguing for lane Kiffin?


For the SEC
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
49068 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

quote:

that’s the case I could be wrong but LSU gets the auto W



It wouldn't count towards the season record



According to NCAA and SEC bylaws, it would.
Posted by Milk
central
Member since May 2010
1366 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

. Any appellate circuit could just simply vacate the order and the underlying injunction, rule that the SEC could enforce its rule retroactively, and allow the penalties.


This is not how it works. It’s the exact opposite of how it works.

LSU follows injunction for 6 weeks, appellate court dissolves injunction after 6 weeks, SEC cannot penalize LSU for those 6 weeks.

You and the guy arguing over NIL should start a new topic and discuss it.

Posted by JayVegas702
Las Vegas
Member since Oct 2025
830 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

Judge interrupted again saying that when he was a freshman he took a seniors spot and that putting seniors on a team doesn't mean that they will automatically take someone's spot.

Ncaa says well these are all good players and they will take someone's spot.


Posted by LSU4LIFEo85
Member since Jun 2020
47 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:47 pm to
Wow. Thank you
Posted by Run DMC
somewhere in Louisiana it's tricky
Member since Jan 2007
6275 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

UnsureTiger


Thank you!
Jump to page
Page First 69 70 71 72 73 ... 83
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 71 of 83Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram