- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Live hearing thread
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:03 pm to Tiger in the Sticks
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:03 pm to Tiger in the Sticks
Exactly.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:04 pm to Scoob
quote:
he/they
Pronouns are for the Aggie board
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:04 pm to RummelTiger
quote:
No, it's not.
Yes it is.
Read the contracts that prevented LSU from getting that UW qb.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:06 pm to JohnnyKilroy
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:06 pm to Nutriaitch
quote:
revenue share comes directly from the school itself as a percentage of revenue generated by the athletic department.
They are NIL deals. Read the contracts that leaked from earlier this year. They are NIL deals directly with the schools.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:07 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
quote:
Get him Rummel!

Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:07 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
quote:
My wife has a Cricut and a T-shirt press.
same. if i got the logo she can make it
Sister in law has a sublimation printer...basically a ink screen printer for fabrics. we can def make this happen!
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:08 pm to RB10
Can someone please explain what the difference is between a professional player and a college player. Since the beginning of NIL, college players have been paid to play their sport. Hence, they are now professional players. College is now really just the minor leagues, similar to MLB. MLB has A, AA, & AAA farm system. That is what college has always been, but since they are getting paid now, they should be considered professional athletes.
With that said, these few players should be allowed to come back from the practice squads to play college one more year. This has been one of the most ridiculous law suits and trials ever. They were getting paid while in college, they got paid while on the practice squad, and they will get paid again to play college sports, if allowed by the courts.
With that said, these few players should be allowed to come back from the practice squads to play college one more year. This has been one of the most ridiculous law suits and trials ever. They were getting paid while in college, they got paid while on the practice squad, and they will get paid again to play college sports, if allowed by the courts.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:08 pm to LSU_Legz
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
One last overarching thought -- and then I really do need to return to actual work: LSU’s roster is due tomorrow. The federal complaint does not itself prohibit LSU from adding these players. But doing so would convert a threatened violation into an accomplished fact, strengthen the SEC’s request for emergency relief, and knowingly expose LSU, Kiffin, and the administration to enormous Conference sanctions if the existing restraint is dissolved or stayed. Given the Louisiana hearing, the likely appellate proceedings, the federal action, and the SEC’s independent disciplinary authority, I cannot imagine a rational institutional decision-maker placing these players on the active roster tomorrow.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 5:09 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:09 pm to RummelTiger
So then why was Mensah's Duke rev share deal and Demond Williams's UW contract all about him licensing his NIL to the school in exchange for monetary compensation?
I don't care what some website says. I'm reading the contract.
I don't care what some website says. I'm reading the contract.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:09 pm to JohnnyKilroy
NIL is outside parties giving money- opportunities to athletes . For example Canes having athletes doing commercials. Rev share is money directly from University funds. The other difference is every NIL deal over $600 must go through approval process, a school can pay whatever they want with rev share with no approval necessary
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 5:17 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:11 pm to Raging Tiger
I basically agree with this. If LSU can add these players later, I wouldn't add them now. It makes that lawsuit against LSU ridiculous as long as LSU doesn't make any overt acts in contravention of league rules.
The player lawsuit will continue parallel to all this, and the SEC claiming LSU damaged it vis a vis that litigation seems dumb to me.
The player lawsuit will continue parallel to all this, and the SEC claiming LSU damaged it vis a vis that litigation seems dumb to me.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 5:12 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:11 pm to Tifway419
There is no difference between the two. It says it in the freaking name. “Rookie Mini-Camp”. Rookie is referring to what exactly? College rookies? Or NFL rookies? What does the NFL stand for, and what are their employees that play in the games job title?
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 5:14 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:11 pm to Raging Tiger
quote:
One last overarching thought -- and then I really do need to return to actual work: LSU’s roster is due tomorrow. The federal complaint does not itself prohibit LSU from adding these players. But doing so would convert a threatened violation into an accomplished fact, strengthen the SEC’s request for emergency relief, and knowingly expose LSU, Kiffin, and the administration to enormous Conference sanctions if the existing restraint is dissolved or stayed. Given the Louisiana hearing, the likely appellate proceedings, the federal action, and the SEC’s independent disciplinary authority, I cannot imagine a rational institutional decision-maker placing these players on the active roster tomorrow.
Sure but why just LSU and not all of these other same member institutions get a pass?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:11 pm to UnsureTiger
quote:
No particular football athlete was brought up. Sankey did say he does not consider mini camp participation to be professional but he does consider training camp participation as making a football player a professional.
So he admitting they’re just making it up as they go.
Bold strategy.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:12 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Judge there is a Bama grad.
She's also a Republican appointed by Trump.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:13 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
So then why was Mensah's Duke rev share deal and Demond Williams's UW contract all about him licensing his NIL to the school in exchange for monetary compensation?
I don't care what some website says. I'm reading the contract.
Dude...they are two different things.
The NIL is paid through a third-party, while rev share comes straight from the school.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:13 pm to MintBerry Crunch
That’s the point. They are alleging on the behalf of unaggrieved parties damage claims that don’t make sense if they (SEC) are who they say they are.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:13 pm to DrEdgeLSU
Correct. They are a 501(c)(3) charitable non-profit organization.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 5:15 pm
Popular
Back to top


0






