- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Live hearing thread
Posted on 9/3/26 at 4:56 pm to ApexTiger
Posted on 9/3/26 at 4:56 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
so it's a shame the football guys generational wealth while others get zero
No it's not considering the amount of money the football players generate.
And not all football guys get paid that well...
Posted on 9/3/26 at 4:57 pm to Pikes Peak Tiger
quote:Rookie Mini-Camp
Yes or no, do ANY nfl veterans participate in minicamp? If yes, then minicamp is “professional” Sankey has no argument.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 4:57 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
rev share isn’t NIL
quote:
Yes it is
No, it's not.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 4:57 pm to UnsureTiger
quote:
Sankey did say he does not consider mini camp participation to be professional but he does consider training camp participation as making a football player a professional.
So is Stankey just giving his opinion or is he basing this on official rules, guidance etc?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 4:57 pm to UnsureTiger
quote:
No particular football athlete was brought up. Sankey did say he does not consider mini camp participation to be professional but he does consider training camp participation as making a football player a professional
Because thats the exact line that allows him to target LSU.
LSU needs to counter sue. Period.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 4:58 pm to w5oer
Non profit
Scam. Biggest scam going. Churches, entities that make billions
Tax them all
Scam. Biggest scam going. Churches, entities that make billions
Tax them all
Posted on 9/3/26 at 4:58 pm to RummelTiger
Yo are yall watching the hearing/
Posted on 9/3/26 at 4:58 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
Maybe this whole thing will be thrown out on grounds that Sankey is retarded.
It's the JohnBel syndrome
Posted on 9/3/26 at 4:58 pm to Decatur
quote:
So is Stankey just giving his opinion or is he basing this on official rules, guidance etc?
in the court of law you generally just shut the frick up and do whatever your lawyer tells you...take that as you will as to the conversation he had while under oath
Posted on 9/3/26 at 4:58 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
rev share isn’t NI
quote:
Yes it is
no it isn’t.
revenue share comes directly from the school itself as a percentage of revenue generated by the athletic department.
NIL is any 3rd party deal (schools can help land/negotiate the deals) you can land that pays you for using your Name, Image, or Likeness.
basically same thing as endorsements in professional leagues, just called something different.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 4:58 pm to UnsureTiger
quote:
Sankey did say he does not consider mini camp participation to be professional but he does consider training camp participation as making a football player a professional.
So the next question I hoped he was asked, was “why?”
Posted on 9/3/26 at 4:59 pm to RummelTiger
Sankey is being intellectually dishonest by drawing distinctions between NFL players being professional athletes and college players being just "college students." Today's college football players are professional athletes. Most will make more money in college off of things like NIL than they could ever make in the NFL. Jack Pyburn was forced to take a pay cut when the Chiefs claimed him and put him into a rookie contract. He would have made more money at LSU this year.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 4:59 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
rule against professionalism still applied under the SEC bylaws
Ok, so why did they not say anything in all the other cases for both football and basketball. I would honestly be OK with the SEC or NCAA saying any player that received time due to a TRO/Injunction cannot play. That sets a level playing field for all involved.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:00 pm to Tigerbaddad
quote:
are yall watching the hearing/
We're "watching" it via UnsureTigers live tweets as he's said he's in court today and has been accurate with all updates thus far so have no reason to doubt him
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:00 pm to Tigerbaddad
quote:
Yo are yall watching the hearing/
Yo!
No (not televised), but everyone's new favorite poster, UnsureTiger, is providing updates.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:01 pm to RummelTiger
Is this hearing still going on?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:02 pm to LSUFanHouston
About half way through.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:03 pm to tigerskin
From what I've seen about SEC standing issues in the Federal Suit, they allege tons of injuries of third-parties and mission-based injuries, both of which are not sufficient to grant standing after FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine decided in 2024.
However, reputational injury and brand injury are the best possible arguments for standing, but they were not well-pleaded. However, this probably won't get everyone dismissed at the 12(b)(1) motion stage.
However, reputational injury and brand injury are the best possible arguments for standing, but they were not well-pleaded. However, this probably won't get everyone dismissed at the 12(b)(1) motion stage.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 5:04 pm
Popular
Back to top



1







