- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 2/2/09 at 11:41 am to LSUMJ
quote:
ummm we arent playing stanford
Mike Montgomery is at California now. Johnson was an assistant under him when he was at Stanford,including 1998 when they went to the Final Four.
Posted on 2/2/09 at 11:41 am to usc6158
dammit!!!!!
i thought "boss" as in former employer
crap, sorry 59
i thought "boss" as in former employer
crap, sorry 59
Posted on 2/2/09 at 11:42 am to JustSmokin
Well what's better: an 11/12? I bet 7/10s have made more sweet 16s than 11/12s. With few exceptions, a lower seed is always desired.
That 8/9 is tough because you are guaranteed a #1 in the 2nd round. But FWIW two #8s made th Final 4 in 2000 and it isn't all that uncommon for a #8#9 to beat at #1.
That 8/9 is tough because you are guaranteed a #1 in the 2nd round. But FWIW two #8s made th Final 4 in 2000 and it isn't all that uncommon for a #8#9 to beat at #1.
Posted on 2/2/09 at 11:42 am to BulkLogan1
quote:
Lunardi lost all credibility putting UK at a 6th seed. They are 66th in the rpi. We are 56th in the rpi.
that is ridiculous, KY should be approaching bubble status.
This post was edited on 2/2/09 at 11:45 am
Posted on 2/2/09 at 11:44 am to Stromile Swift
Maybe lost all credibility is a bit much. I shoulda said he made a mistake.
Posted on 2/2/09 at 11:45 am to BulkLogan1
quote:
Maybe lost all credibility is a bit much. I shoulda said he made a mistake.
Just for the record, I was agreeing with you. He definitely has KY too high.
Posted on 2/2/09 at 11:46 am to noladan
No Notre Dame.... Calling Digger.
Posted on 2/2/09 at 11:52 am to The Cable Guy
5 SEC Teams, LSU only 1 from SEC West.
Posted on 2/2/09 at 11:54 am to noladan
I'm assuming that the blue arrow means that they could fall and the red arrow means the team is on the rise?
I love the way LSU is playing. Right now, we win the west and we are in. JMHO. We beat either Florida or Kentucky and make at least a semi finals appearance in the SEC Tourney I think we are at least a #7 seed.
We kick UK and UF's butt and win the Tourney then we are talking 4 or 3 seed. Bif "ifs" I know, but this is all hypothetical right?
I love the way LSU is playing. Right now, we win the west and we are in. JMHO. We beat either Florida or Kentucky and make at least a semi finals appearance in the SEC Tourney I think we are at least a #7 seed.
We kick UK and UF's butt and win the Tourney then we are talking 4 or 3 seed. Bif "ifs" I know, but this is all hypothetical right?
This post was edited on 2/2/09 at 11:55 am
Posted on 2/2/09 at 11:54 am to Port City
quote:
5 SEC Teams, LSU only 1 from SEC West.
Besides LSU, no one from the West even warrants serious consideration. This is the exact reason LSU SHOULD win the overall SEC title. The East will continue to beat up on each other while LSU should feast on the other SEC West teams.
Posted on 2/2/09 at 11:54 am to Port City
quote:
Just for the record, I was agreeing with you. He definitely has KY too high.
Yea I know, but lunardi is a pretty good analyist most of the time. Just on this one...
Posted on 2/2/09 at 11:55 am to Stromile Swift
quote:
This is the exact reason LSU SHOULD win the overall SEC title.
I can't see any team finishing better than 12-4 in the East. LSU looks poised to do just that.
It could be a repeat of 1999-2000. LSU, UF, UK, and Tenn all tied at 12-4
Posted on 2/2/09 at 11:56 am to BulkLogan1
Don't forget that the name on the front of the jersey automatically gets a team a high seed at the beginning of the year that they must lose over the course of the year.
Posted on 2/2/09 at 11:58 am to Stromile Swift
California would lose to LSU by 45. I mean, come on. They're from the Pac 10 and we're SEC!
Posted on 2/2/09 at 12:00 pm to lsumatt
quote:
Well what's better: an 11/12? I bet 7/10s have made more sweet 16s than 11/12s.
Since 2000, 11 seed has 17 wins and 12 seed has 16. That's as good as 9 seed with 16 and only a couple wins behind 10 seed with 19.
Big advantage for 8 seed with 26 wins, but it's a mixed bag for 9 through 12.
This post was edited on 2/2/09 at 12:06 pm
Posted on 2/2/09 at 12:45 pm to artvandelay1987
quote:
TJ coached at Stanford...not Cal
Think before you post
Do you know that he worked under other people to get where he is at today? One of these people could be coaching at Cal? Here, take another
Posted on 2/2/09 at 12:49 pm to noladan
Cal? Last time we played them (3/18/93), a little POS named Jason Kidd went nuts on us.
Posted on 2/2/09 at 12:53 pm to Jrv2damac
quote:
They're from the Pac 10 and we're SEC!
This isn't football.....
But yes, I think LSU would beat down Cal. 2nd round game would be very bad for LSU though.
Posted on 2/2/09 at 1:08 pm to artvandelay1987
quote:
TJ coached at Stanford...not Cal
we know.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News