- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Rules In Favor Of Athletes In LSU-SEC Eligibility Battle...Live Updates Inside
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:13 am to MorbidTheClown
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:13 am to MorbidTheClown
I can’t see that it would
There are going to be other rostered players that don’t play
They just have to be on the roster for today’s deadline from what I understand
There are going to be other rostered players that don’t play
They just have to be on the roster for today’s deadline from what I understand
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:14 am to FredbullTN
quote:
Ole Miss is suing former players. LSU is willing to bet sued for players. Just different!
I’m thinking ole girl will come out of retirement in the game thread tomorrow night
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:16 am to LSUJML
Admittedly don’t understand all of the parts of this thing. I wish it wasn’t happening but, here we are.
I’m not even a kiffin fan. Never have been. But, he’s our guy now and i want him to win.
I’m not even a kiffin fan. Never have been. But, he’s our guy now and i want him to win.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:17 am to UCLAMAN
quote:
LSU is so desperate they have to pull a stunt like this ??
And when USC fires its coach Vain Kiffen will be flying to LA the next day .
LMAO. Lane isnt leaving LSU for a downgrade in LA. You must be on that hippy lettuce.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 8:18 am
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:23 am to MorbidTheClown
I only got invested in this yesterday because I was bored at work & recently was a juror in Judge Jorden’s court
Too much drama for me but you can’t make up rules as you go & not apply them across the board
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:30 am to MorbidTheClown
Only a few more months
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:35 am to UnsureTiger
Do I have this order of events right?
1. College players from high school class of '22 who were out of eligibility either had to retire from football or try to make an NFL roster
2. Players who attempted to make an NFL roster went through draft and camps
3. NCAA announces 5/5 rule in June '26 after draft and some camps, which includes high school class of '22
4. Those players who chose to retire are welcomed back to college football
5. Those players who chose to try and make an NFL roster but only made it through minicamp are welcomed back to college football
6. Those players who chose to try and make an NFL roster but only made it through training camp are left with no options
7. Those players with no options sued the NCAA for another year of eligibility based on 5/5 and their peers being named eligible
8. Hundreds of players sued in over 6 states
9. Once SEC made a rule mid-stream about “NFL players” playing in the league, the SEC was added to the lawsuit by the players hoping to play in the SEC
10. The players won and received TRO to allow them to play
11. The court order also stipulates colleges cannot choose to not roster those players based on fear or retribution from NCAA or SEC
12. These players are now going to be rostered, but there is nothing stopping programs from not playing them
1. College players from high school class of '22 who were out of eligibility either had to retire from football or try to make an NFL roster
2. Players who attempted to make an NFL roster went through draft and camps
3. NCAA announces 5/5 rule in June '26 after draft and some camps, which includes high school class of '22
4. Those players who chose to retire are welcomed back to college football
5. Those players who chose to try and make an NFL roster but only made it through minicamp are welcomed back to college football
6. Those players who chose to try and make an NFL roster but only made it through training camp are left with no options
7. Those players with no options sued the NCAA for another year of eligibility based on 5/5 and their peers being named eligible
8. Hundreds of players sued in over 6 states
9. Once SEC made a rule mid-stream about “NFL players” playing in the league, the SEC was added to the lawsuit by the players hoping to play in the SEC
10. The players won and received TRO to allow them to play
11. The court order also stipulates colleges cannot choose to not roster those players based on fear or retribution from NCAA or SEC
12. These players are now going to be rostered, but there is nothing stopping programs from not playing them
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 8:36 am
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:39 am to LSUJML
quote:
I’m thinking ole girl will come out of retirement in the game thread tomorrow night
I approve!
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:54 am to CatfishJohn
Wrong on number 4. None are being welcomed back. The sec is treating the nfl players differently because they get to say we can’t have former pros coming back. My understanding from the hearing is that no year 22 players were given retroactive eligibility.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:04 am to LSUJML
Heading into enemy territory wearing an LSU shirt. Expecting a lot of looks and comments. frick em
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 9:24 am
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:14 am to Teddy Ruxpin
quote:
You piece of shite
In response to the allegations of Pargraph 1 of the Ruxpin Complaint, admitted.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 9:17 am
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:42 am to RanchoLaPuerto
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:43 am to JayVegas702
Imagine that, ole dickey hating on LSU
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:45 am to MorbidTheClown
Dick Vitale doesn’t even know his own name. Can’t expect him to appreciate the nuance of what is going on
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:45 am to CatfishJohn
quote:
Those players who chose to retire are welcomed back to college football
Not that it matters......but
The way this rule change was written was meant to take into affect 2027. So this 2026 season still fell under the old 5 for 4 rule.
Those 2022 kids who played their four seasons under the old rules were not welcomed back regardless if they went pro (to any extent) or not. The only 2022 kids welcomed back were those that redshirted and were going to play their 4th season this year.
So you have kids from the 2022 class both that went pro and some that never sniffed a pro anything suing.
I think the NCAA knew it was stupid to put this out in June of 26' and it not applying this season so that's when the argument/excuse of "muh they went pro" began being used to get some wins on their side.
Most like the new rule. However like everyone said at the time, the NCAA should've waited until January 27' or so to put it in writing if they wanted it to apply then.
They were warned before they put this out in June this was going to happen.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:46 am to JayVegas702
Sad cry for relevance by Vitale.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:49 am to TigerBait2008
quote:
LMAO. Lane isnt leaving LSU for a downgrade in LA. You must be on that hippy lettuce.
Careful. USC is a private Big10 school in the country’s second largest market with more money than GAWD AND TEXAS combined. Oh, and a recruiting stranglehold on just about everything west of the Rockies (when they choose to take advantage of it).
I have no idea why U$C has farted around for the last two decades, but they are scary when provoked.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:02 am to MorbidTheClown
quote:
Heading into enemy territory wearing an LSU shirt. Expecting a lot of looks and comments. frick em
I have a client in Jackson and I'll be out there quite a bit over the next four months. This should be fun.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:51 am to JayVegas702
I wonder if Vitale is surprised by the ruling in Mississippi giving their star QB a 6th year, while not liking LSU to give players a 5th year they are entitled to by the present NCAA ruling. Such selective nonsense.
Popular
Back to top



1





