- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I’m still very skeptical of this basketball program
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:26 pm to BastropRam13
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:26 pm to BastropRam13
D1 is different for football and basketball. Football has like 125 teams, basketball has I think 355.
This post was edited on 4/6/25 at 8:26 pm
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:26 pm to BastropRam13
quote:
What schools do you consider Div. I?
Do you not know how Divisions in college sports work? You don’t just “consider” a school Division 1. They either are or they aren’t.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:27 pm to BastropRam13
quote:Did you just log onto an alter to double down? Because I can't believe there are two posters in a basketball thread this stupid.
So you consider that every team that makes the NCAA men’s basketball tournament a Div. I team?
ETA: my bad, it was you both times. Wow.
This post was edited on 4/6/25 at 8:29 pm
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:29 pm to mdomingue
quote:These dudes are arguing about who are the 364 D-I schools in basketball and how they all play in the NCAAT - and D-II can jump into playing in the NCAAT.
Only one of these players are from a Division I school.quote:
I love it when a poster removes all doubt about his ignorance.
It's funny/interesting to witness.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:32 pm to BastropRam13
quote:
So you consider that every team that makes the NCAA men’s basketball tournament a Div. I team?
Yes. It's the NCAA division 1 tournament you dumbass.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:32 pm to jamarr
Pretty sure it was a combination
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:35 pm to Madking
OK. I just disagree that most schools the transfers come from would be on a level of the SEC, Big 12, Big Ten, ACC, and East. For LSU to improve, our players need to compete with schools other than “mid majors “.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:35 pm to tigersbb
3 years
98 games
45-53 (fewest wins among SEC teams)
14-40 in SEC play (fewest wins amongst SEC teams…not counting OU and Texas)
LSU, the ONLY SEC program to not go to the NCAA Tournament over the last three years.
You want people to be positive…DO SOMETHING POSITIVE!
98 games
45-53 (fewest wins among SEC teams)
14-40 in SEC play (fewest wins amongst SEC teams…not counting OU and Texas)
LSU, the ONLY SEC program to not go to the NCAA Tournament over the last three years.
You want people to be positive…DO SOMETHING POSITIVE!
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:37 pm to moneyg
quote:
A fair analysis of the team is that it won’t be a tournament team.
Go look at the 2026 championship odds on Fan Duel. We’re an abysmal 32nd on the list. So someone thinks we have a chance.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:40 pm to mmcgrath
OK. I am sure that if LSU gets its transfers from schools other than the SEC, ACC, Big 12, etc., we will win championships.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:43 pm to BROpaneTANK
quote:Let’s see the bet slips from the crew.
Go look at the 2026 championship odds on Fan Duel. We’re an abysmal 32nd on the list. So someone thinks we have a chance
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:47 pm to BastropRam13
It comes down to horrible coaching and a boring offense that he runs… recruiting never seems to work out….players seem to enter the transfer portal quickly….they see the hand writing on the wall and leave…
Posted on 4/6/25 at 9:40 pm to BastropRam13
I hear you and you can build a good team through mid major transfers but teams who’ve done it have recruited certain types that fit their system who were also a certain level of player. We have no identity so we’re not fitting player to style and we haven’t upgraded the talent. What we’ve done is sign one good player to replace the one we lost and it won’t be enough.
This post was edited on 4/6/25 at 9:42 pm
Posted on 4/6/25 at 9:46 pm to tigersbb
quote:Lots of MF'ers on here are sane "Realists" that don't have P&G pom poms shoved up their arse.
frick you and frick everyone with this kind of attitude. You mother frickers just can't be positive.
OP is a perfect example of a Pump Nut Cheerleader MA Eunuch that starts up the juvenile name calling theatrics when anybody posts an opinion that's not 100% pumped in from Sol. (The Sun) He's slacking though. The dude didn't call us MF'ers "Miserable."
When you can't attack the Message, just attack the Messenger, huh?
Posted on 4/6/25 at 9:48 pm to semjase
That dude just compared Robert Miller to Tim Duncan lol. So if you pair that with Reed who we’re told is the next Joker there’s no way you shouldn’t win the national championship next season.
This post was edited on 4/6/25 at 9:50 pm
Posted on 4/6/25 at 10:07 pm to Madking
We will have a new coach after next season. This dude is not good enough of a coach or recruiter to make it in the SEC.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 10:12 pm to nwallb9
I hope so but I don’t trust the little piggy at all.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 10:21 pm to Mats86
Also Northeastern is a pretty well known team.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 10:23 pm to BastropRam13
Isn't that one of the requirements for making the tournament?
Posted on 4/6/25 at 11:00 pm to Tigershine
Perhaps, certainly northwestern, northeastern wasn’t well known to me until I lived in New England. But that’s just me I suppose.
Popular
Back to top


1




