- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How/why does LSU allow a person to Head Coach a bowl football game for a team that
Posted on 12/17/25 at 12:24 pm to Gerry Laval
Posted on 12/17/25 at 12:24 pm to Gerry Laval
quote:
Obviously you’ve never read The Art of War
nothing in this day and age of college football makes any sense anymore
Posted on 12/17/25 at 12:26 pm to wadewilson
LSU fans on TD: "We're laughing at Ole Miss because they wouldn't allow Kiffin to coach Ole Miss"
Also LSU fans TD:
Also LSU fans TD:
quote:
Wilson should be suspended until his official hire date at Ole Miss.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 12:32 pm to QB
Ten years ago, I doubt we would see this. But in today's world, I think both head coaches (LSU/UM) realize that players don't pick schools because of personalities on the staff. None of the assistants are poaching anything, that happens when the checkbooks come out.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 12:45 pm to Nate711
Lots of “integrity” in supposedly Bleeding P&G then bolting for Oxford!?! Sure buddy… 
Posted on 12/17/25 at 12:51 pm to Broski
Completely different circumstances.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 1:00 pm to QB
Is it really this hard for y'all that we need 100 threads questioning it? He's the interim coach 10 days before a bowl game that nobody gives a shite about.
He's taking a position coach job because Lane doesn't have a spot for him.
Who gives a shite about Frank coaching a meaningless bowl game.
He's taking a position coach job because Lane doesn't have a spot for him.
Who gives a shite about Frank coaching a meaningless bowl game.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 1:05 pm to QB
Agreements in place and consistency. They already had an interim Coach they're not going to have another interim and Lane isn't going to Coach the team for the bowl game.
Its really not that big of a deal. And I don't think there is as much truth to the rumors about him anti-recruiting against LSU as what was reported/rumored.
Its really not that big of a deal. And I don't think there is as much truth to the rumors about him anti-recruiting against LSU as what was reported/rumored.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 1:06 pm to wadewilson
quote:
Completely different circumstances.
Sure buddy
Posted on 12/17/25 at 1:09 pm to Broham
quote:
It's a meaningless bowl game.
Sure it is, won't argue that. But for some it'll be the last time they ever put on pads for competitive football. Anyone that has played significantly even for high school understands that. It means something. So meaningless for some of our stars, so put in the guys that never got to play a snap. Let them enjoy a bowl experience.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 2:17 pm to timlan2057
Very different not same conference.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 2:19 pm to QB
quote:
he subconsciously wants to undermine, as much as possible.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 2:26 pm to Broham
quote:
It's a meaningless bowl game.
Wondered when this retarded response would be posted.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 2:29 pm to QB
quote:nothing Frank Wilson does in this meaningless bowl game will have any real impact on LSU's football program going forward.
How/why does LSU allow a person to Head Coach a bowl football game for a team that
Ya'll are getting WAAYYY too worked up about nothing.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 2:33 pm to CDawson
quote:
quote:
It's a meaningless bowl game.
quote:sorry, but this bowl game is utterly meaningless.
Wondered when this retarded response would be posted.
It'll be played by players (many of whom will be gone next year) under the prior staff's schemes and under many of the prior staff.
Next year, we'll have a new head coach who will have a new staff, new schemes, and new players.
And we're 7-5 playing in a lower-tier bowl game.
It's meaningless.
This post was edited on 12/17/25 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 12/17/25 at 2:44 pm to LSUJJP
quote:
Lots of “integrity” in supposedly Bleeding P&G then bolting for Oxford!?! Sure buddy…
He’s not bolting. He isn’t being retained by Kiffin. Do you understand the difference? What do you expect him to do?
Posted on 12/17/25 at 2:50 pm to OldManRiver
quote:
I'm continually amazed at the naive lens so many LSU posters/fans view CFB from in 2025
I’m continually amazed by the fact that so many think money has completely wiped out the emotions and relationship side of sports. Yes money talks. Yes he is contracted through the bowl game. I’m sure he was told that he wouldn’t be retained already. It takes integrity to keep coaching a team that you know you won’t be returning to next season. It’s not just money, it can be all of the above.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 2:51 pm to atltiger6487
quote:
quote:
quote:
It's a meaningless bowl game.
quote:
Wondered when this retarded response would be posted.
sorry, but this bowl game is utterly meaningless.
It'll be played by players (many of whom will be gone next year) under the prior staff's schemes and under many of the prior staff.
Next year, we'll have a new head coach who will have a new staff, new schemes, and new players.
And we're 7-5 playing in a lower-tier bowl game.
It's meaningless.
Tell that to the players. Every down, snap, tackle, pass, catch and run means something to them. And for a few, it'll be the last time in their life doing it.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 3:00 pm to QB
Don’t really care. Season is basically over and it’s a bowl game.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 3:00 pm to Cuz413
quote:of course this bowl game means something to some of the players.
Tell that to the players. Every down, snap, tackle, pass, catch and run means something to them. And for a few, it'll be the last time in their life doing it.
But more broadly, this game is meaningless for the LSU football program as a whole. Whether we win by 30 or lose by 30, it won't have any impact moving forward.
(And I also suspect that many of the players think this is a shitty and meaningless bowl game too. Not all of them, of course, but a sizeable percentage realize what this game is, and isn't).
Posted on 12/17/25 at 3:01 pm to TopWaterTiger
quote:
Hell LSU should have declined bid.
Yeah. Because who on an LSU football forum would want to watch/attend an LSU football game.
Popular
Back to top


0





