- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/6/23 at 8:22 am to Walnut
quote:
He is underperforming in year 1 relative to the situation he was in to start the year. He deserves a year 2, but if he doesn't show improvement, can his arse
Agree with all of this. The situation was exceptionally rare. ZERO players less than a year ago. But the players haven't improved, and the fight just isn't there.
Posted on 2/6/23 at 8:34 am to mcspufftiger7
quote:
So one coach brought his players from Cleveland State and the other brought his players from Murray State and the players from Cleveland St ended up being better but somehow that's MM fault.
The point is that despite the constant cries of "leave Matt alone", he wasn't the only new coach that got stuck with having to essentially rebuild his entire roster upon getting the LSU job. Missouri's new HC had to do so (9 transfers). Kansas State's HC had to do so (10 transfers), and many other schools with new HC's had to bring in 6, 7, 8 new players. Yet, coaches at Kansas St and Missouri have found ways to win and be competitive immediately, while LSU is currently on a 10 game losing streak with 9 of those losses coming by 10 point or more. And the only loss by less than 10 was to a (at that time) 10-1 (0-8) last place Big 12 team that was missing one of their three leading scorers.
quote:
They have played some of their best ball against Tenn, Mizzou and AL.
You unintentionally proved how bad McMahon has been this year by trying to make an excuse for his terrible performance. "Some of their BEST ball" resulted in a 21 point home loss to Tennessee. A 10 point loss at Missouri where LSU fell behind by double-digits 8 minutes into the game and NEVER got the game within single digits the rest of the way. A 10 point home loss to Alabama. And that is their BEST basketball. Which by definition means other games have been worse!
This isn't a case of a HC failing to meet unrealistic expectations. The expectations were the lowest they have been in 6 years (since Wade's first season) and he's not even coming close to reaching those. But for South Carolina being horrible, LSU would be the worst team in the SEC.
quote:
but anyone calling for his job right now is an idiot
What exactly do you see that gives reason for optimism? The team is getting blown out in every game. The current recruiting class is wholly unremarkable relative to major-conference programs. They will be losing their best player (K.J. Williams). The freshman class he signed going into the season has given you virtually nothing (though Ward did show flashes once McMahon was forced to play him last game). And it is entirely likely he is going to have to completely rebuild the roster again next season given transfers are just the nature of college basketball today. So with, potentially, a WORSE roster than this season, where is the hope for better days? And if there is no realistic outlook for improvement, why waste 2-3 more years just to "confirm" that?
That said, he's not going to get fired. I know that. But I don't think it is wholly irrational to have serious concerns about the guy given the horrible performance to date. In Johnson's first season LSU won the SEC. In Jones's first season LSU at least competed in the SEC (with a very weak roster) and he signed a top 10 recruiting class for the following season. In Wade's first season he took a very pieced together roster (with Waters being a late-signed savior) an led a team picked to finish LAST in the SEC to a tie for 6th place. He also signed a top 10 recruiting class for the following season.
As we sit here today it is not unrealistic to think LSU may "achieve" or tie the worst conference record in the history of the program. And unlike with Jones and Wade, there is no great recruiting class to give reason for optimism next season.
I want McMahon to succeed because I want LSU to succeed. But I'm not going to bury my head up my arse to pretend he hasn't been horrible in SEC play (and not all that much better in non-conf. play). It is what it is. Want to stop the criticism? Win some damn games instead of being virtual lock for a 10+ point loss every time out.
Posted on 2/6/23 at 8:42 am to Big Gorilla
quote:
The situation was exceptionally rare.
Except it wasn't.
Kansas St returned TWO players from last year's team. The new HC had to bring in 10 new players. They are a top 10 team right now. Missouri, who LSU just lost to by 10, had only 3 players return. Their new HC had to bring in 9 transfers and 1 HS signee. They are on pace right now for a NCAA Tournament bid.
NO ONE expected McMahon to win, or even compete for an SEC title this season. No one expected them to make the NCAA Tournament. Yet, even with such low expectations he is on pace to grossly underachieve. As in he might finish with the worst single season SEC record in school history (or at least tie it).
But hey, maybe he is taking the Sharon Weston-Broome approach to success. Set the bar so incredibly low this season that a 5-13 SEC record next year would look like a rousing success...even though it would still be one of the worst SEC finishes in 10 years.
Posted on 2/6/23 at 1:47 pm to 308
Be careful. I posted a couple weeks ago to give MM a chance. The rant lived up to its reputation. I placed myself in front of a firing squad. I still see effort in the team and no one wants to win more than they do. It appeared that way to me against Bama. I’m all in. If 3 years from now we don’t see a change. Then it may be time to move on 
Posted on 2/6/23 at 5:56 pm to S
quote:
I’d be a lot more sympathetic to the whole “he inherited nothing” thing if multiple other coaches in our league didn’t walk into the almost exact situation and find a way to assemble a roster that doesn’t get brained every night
Genuine question S, which coaches came into their program as late as McMahon with potential heavy sanctions pending?
As much as we’ve sucked I really do think this situation was shitty and he gets a pass for this year. If we suck next year then I’ll be ready to admit he doesn’t have it as a major coach.
Posted on 2/6/23 at 6:11 pm to unctiger4
quote:
Genuine question S, which coaches came into their program as late as McMahon with potential heavy sanctions pending?
Tommy Lloyd at Arizona last season. Foolishly, he didn’t just accept his team couldn’t be good. And with a little bit of naive determination he was able to scrap his was to a 33-4 record; a Pac 12 championship and No.1 seed in the NCAA Tournament.
LSU “fans” are the only ones pissing themselves daily about “severe sanctions” all while finding any and every excuse possible to excuse McMahon from doing a bad job this season. NO ONE, repeat, NO ONE thought LSU should be fighting for a SEC championship like Arizona did last season. But this team is not even close to half of that goal. They are literally fighting to just not be the worst team in the SEC…in a conference where nearly half the teams have first year HC’s this season.
I think the “leave Matt alone” crowd thinks those criticizing him are doing so because he’s not going to win the SEC this year. That couldn’t be further from the truth. It’s that he’s not even competitive. 1-9 SEC record with NINE straight double-digit losses.
Posted on 2/6/23 at 6:28 pm to Alt26
LSU is consistently underrated in the pre season year after year. This season we were picked 8th in the SEC. McMahon has us in last place so even according to the more pessimistic outlooks he’s underperforming by a lot.
This post was edited on 2/6/23 at 6:29 pm
Posted on 2/6/23 at 6:38 pm to 308
This year was going to always be trash. Nobody was going to walk into the shitshow Woodward created and do well. Next year better at least show some solid improvement or he should be gone
He gets a pass year one but won't be so lucky for year 2
He gets a pass year one but won't be so lucky for year 2
Posted on 2/6/23 at 6:43 pm to Madking
No no we all thought this was a nc team. The leave Matt alone crowd has to move goal post and make shite up instead of facing reality.
We are a complete dumpster fire right now. I honestly expected a tenth or maybe worse finish but to at least show some fight and not get beat by double digits over and over again. The future is so bleak.
We are a complete dumpster fire right now. I honestly expected a tenth or maybe worse finish but to at least show some fight and not get beat by double digits over and over again. The future is so bleak.
Posted on 2/6/23 at 6:50 pm to Big4SALTbro
What the excuse makers don’t understand because they don’t follow basketball is being picked 8th in the SEC is a bubble team position. So this narrative that we have Mcneese type talent is flat out made up by them. It doesn’t matter the standardized comparisons you make they all refute their narrative. Another thing they don’t get because they mostly apply football logic to basketball is that if we just keep improving and adjusting in basketball you always have a chance to play your way in. McMahon is not capable, that’s where the frustration from the actual basketball fans comes from.
Posted on 2/6/23 at 6:57 pm to Madking
It’s so bad, MM hasn’t done one thing to give hope. We have managed to not improve all year, we get blown out, his offense is middle school level and boring, his recruiting his poor and his energy is low. I really want to be wrong on him but I’d put it at 99.99 that he is going to be a failure. I’m clawing for any light from him that we will be ok but nothing is there.
Posted on 2/6/23 at 6:58 pm to Big4SALTbro
quote:I think a of us had realistic goalposts. NIT? Was probably the goal.
The leave Matt alone crowd has to move goal post and make shite up instead of facing reality.
We didn't expect to be this. And I see Alt26 posted before me, but just think about SECT, we're going to be 11-14 seed. That's what we are.
This post was edited on 2/6/23 at 6:59 pm
Posted on 2/6/23 at 7:00 pm to drizztiger
I thought maybe bubble NIT. I put the bar so low, bubble NIT even just missing it but maybe we could have some hope in recruiting. Instead we get dead last in the sec, double digit uncompetitive games, and 51 in recruiting ranking. I put the bar on the ground and MM is managing to dig a tunnel under it.
Posted on 2/6/23 at 7:04 pm to Big4SALTbro
quote:I seriously
I put the bar on the ground and MM is managing to dig a tunnel under it.
I'm trying to see the light, you've seen my posts before.
I don't even want to look at like Kenpom right now to see where we are. I did think we had NIT potential.
Posted on 2/6/23 at 7:06 pm to 308
The man was on everyone's short list. He can flat out coach. He inherited a very young team with a cloud hanging over it. Most of the young players decided to transfer instead of dealing with the unknown of a new coach and culture. The players were also targeted by other schools with NIL money in place to lure them over.
Give CMM a few years to right the ship. With our new "Collective" in place we should be able to get a few nice pieces. Give it a few years.
Give CMM a few years to right the ship. With our new "Collective" in place we should be able to get a few nice pieces. Give it a few years.
Posted on 2/6/23 at 7:24 pm to Eatem up
quote:
The man was on everyone's short list. He can flat out coach. He inherited a very young team with a cloud hanging over it. Most of the young players decided to transfer instead of dealing with the unknown of a new coach and culture. The players were also targeted by other schools with NIL money in place to lure them over.
Give CMM a few years to right the ship. With our new "Collective" in place we should be able to get a few nice pieces. Give it a few years.
This reads like some AI generated propaganda. What has he shown that shows he can flat out coach is it the constant 5+ min scoring droughts we have multiple times each half.
Posted on 2/6/23 at 9:08 pm to Jar_Jar_80
It’s the same dumbasses who were claiming last season that Wade needed to be fired because we were only .500 in conference.
The same talking points you heard from members of the admin behind closed doors. Make no mistake, there is an effort to control narrative on this board.
Woody is in serious damage control mode. WW is not going to get hit with a show cause and will be coaching college basketball in the next 2 years. It will be obvious that Woody blew it up because he didn’t like Wade and wanted his own guy. His own guy is now painfully over his head and has a high price tag to buy him out.
The same talking points you heard from members of the admin behind closed doors. Make no mistake, there is an effort to control narrative on this board.
Woody is in serious damage control mode. WW is not going to get hit with a show cause and will be coaching college basketball in the next 2 years. It will be obvious that Woody blew it up because he didn’t like Wade and wanted his own guy. His own guy is now painfully over his head and has a high price tag to buy him out.
This post was edited on 2/6/23 at 9:18 pm
Posted on 2/6/23 at 11:55 pm to S
quote:
If multiple other coaches
Did they have to try to recruit ballplayers in with the possibility of severe NCAA sanctions hanging over their head?
I don’t see any difference makers coming here until everyone knows what’s coming down.
Whining and crying about the basketball program until the ruling comes down sometime this year doesn’t make a hell of a lot of sense.
Posted on 2/7/23 at 12:48 am to Lonnie4LSU
quote:
Whining and crying about the basketball program until the ruling comes down sometime this year doesn’t make a hell of a lot of sense.
Eh..... yes and no.
I agree that it doesn't make a lot of sense to jump to conclusions about whatever "sanctions" are imposed, however, to expect the team to be competitive is fair.
McMahon is/was/supposed to be a good offensive coach and this team has looked really flat. There is no fire at all. There's no energy, no leadership. From anyone, including the head coach. That's not meant to be a shot at McMahon or any of the players, it's just a fact. I, and I think anyone that's being realistic, isn't expecting this team to make a run for the Final Four or something but at least be competitive. I haven't seen that. Even in the PMAC. That's on the coach. If the coach is in over his head, the players only know what the coach instructs and then the results follow suit.
It's my understanding that his recruiting hasn't been the best (just what I've read) so I don't know if next year's roster will look much better than this.
I'm not saying the guy needs to be fired tomorrow but it's definitely concerning when the team doesn't look inspired or like they would like to be somewhere else.
Popular
Back to top


0





