- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Can we get a Rant explanation of the FG?
Posted on 10/8/23 at 1:48 pm to Fast Times @ LSU
Posted on 10/8/23 at 1:48 pm to Fast Times @ LSU
If only lasers…
0
Posted on 10/8/23 at 1:50 pm to Knight of Old
Such a dumb rule
Posted on 10/8/23 at 1:51 pm to Fast Times @ LSU
I don’t think there is any way to definitively tell if the kick was good. People saying otherwise are being dishonest.
Posted on 10/8/23 at 1:58 pm to TigerDat
Went over goal post not outside it. Was good but refs didn't consider that.
Posted on 10/8/23 at 7:26 pm to TigerDat
Think about it - if it goes inside the posts it’s good. I don’t know why this is so difficult to understand
Plus I didn’t create the rules - so get off my arse.
Plus I didn’t create the rules - so get off my arse.
Posted on 10/8/23 at 7:28 pm to TigerDat
You are incorrect
Posted on 10/8/23 at 7:56 pm to Gorilla Ball
quote:
it goes over the top of the post it’s defined as a miss. Per tv announcer
It has to be inside the goal post
Has there been a rule change on this? When NLU/ULM won the 1/AA playoff in '87 they had a kicker named Teddy Garcia who kicked every kick high. During the season the coach, Pat Collins, asked for a clarification and the response was that the goalposts do extend up into the sky. But again, that was 1987 and I very well could have missed a rule change.
Posted on 10/8/23 at 9:08 pm to shinerfan
Yes if they do extend all the way up inthe heavens the ball still has to go between the uprights
Posted on 10/8/23 at 9:13 pm to Fast Times @ LSU
Someone call Adam Carolla.
Posted on 10/8/23 at 9:27 pm to Cash
Having read all of this, it still looked to me like it was inside the goal posts.
Posted on 10/8/23 at 9:30 pm to Gorilla Ball
Can they not implement technology in the goal posts to determine good or no good?
Tennis has technology to determine in or out or on the line
Tennis has technology to determine in or out or on the line
Posted on 10/9/23 at 11:59 am to TigerDat
quote:
I know what the rule states, I'm saying the rule is bullshite. It's not consistent with other scoring rules
so you think if it just touches the upright but doesn't go in, it should be good?
because that's how the goal line is treated.
I mean if we're being consistent with other scoring, that's how you'd have to rule it.
Posted on 10/9/23 at 12:28 pm to Tigerik
Those “ pile on” cameras at handy.
Posted on 10/9/23 at 1:08 pm to Gorilla Ball
quote:
If it goes over the top of the post it’s defined as a miss. Per tv announcer
It has to be inside the goal post
If the posts stretched to infinity it would be a doink!
Posted on 10/9/23 at 3:45 pm to Fast Times @ LSU
They showed a replay and it missed. I thought it was good as I was watching but when I saw the replay, I could see it was a miss.
Posted on 10/9/23 at 3:48 pm to logansrun
I have not seen the replay you looked at.
The one I saw looked good.
It would help considerably if those who try to explain all this made the distinction between uprights and “goal post”.
“Cross bar” is a helpful term, imo.
The one I saw looked good.
It would help considerably if those who try to explain all this made the distinction between uprights and “goal post”.
“Cross bar” is a helpful term, imo.
This post was edited on 10/9/23 at 3:49 pm
Posted on 10/9/23 at 4:12 pm to LSUDonMCO
The most precise thing would be to say that if a high kick is mostly outside the upright it’s a miss, mostly inside a make. Since the former would doink out and the latter in.
But I can understand how difficult that would be to judge without some kind of laser/optical technology.
But I can understand how difficult that would be to judge without some kind of laser/optical technology.
Posted on 10/9/23 at 4:17 pm to Colonel Angus
It may have been a chip shot to some, but it was a difficult angle. Compare it to a 3 foot breaking putt.
Posted on 10/9/23 at 4:38 pm to Fast Times @ LSU
They have every camera angle possible but they can't spend a few hundred dollars and rig a camera facing straight upwards on the goal post for these situations?
Posted on 10/9/23 at 5:02 pm to Fast Times @ LSU
quote:
can’t review a kick that goes over the top of the goalposts.
This has always annoyed me. We can take 10 fricking minutes to over analyze every catch...count the blades of green between cleats, check for bobble, how much bobble...analyze how much bobble is acceptable relative to the suspected time a pre-approved body part touched it's first blade of grass.... but we can have a camera look at a ball going over a goal post???
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News