Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Can somebody explain Bediako to me

Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:20 am
Posted by Inside the Eye
Member since Sep 2018
304 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:20 am
I know that the standard answer is going to be that it's bama and the rules don't apply to them, but I can't figure it out. Bediako was quite literally a professional for TWO years before attempting to come back to college, which he did under a TRO for 5 games. I know that Sankey filed an affidavit strongly opposing the ruling, but no lawsuit or threat of expulsion. Please help it make sense!!

Posted by jaytothen
Member since Jan 2020
8859 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:20 am to
quote:

Can somebody explain Bediako to me


quote:

bama and the rules don't apply to them
Posted by ProjectP2294
West St. Louis County
Member since May 2007
79816 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:22 am to
If a coach that dumps his cancer stricken wife to marry one of his employees plays a professional, it doesn't matter because he's at Alabama.

But if Lane Kiffin simply exists, he gets punished.
Posted by mjax57
Vinings, GA
Member since Mar 2012
5154 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:23 am to
What’s crazy about that situation… never once did I think about bumping bama from the conference.. REST of the SEC, as Coach would say.. is SOFT.
Posted by Gnash
KTX
Member since Oct 2015
11608 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:24 am to
Bediako did not sue the SEC
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 8:25 am
Posted by millerf43
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2019
461 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:24 am to
Bediako is an example of Skanky's poor leadership.
Posted by Spocks Brain
Member since Nov 2025
357 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:25 am to
The “rule” was supposedly not in place so they were not in violation of any SEC rules.

Did they have to forfeit those games?
Posted by jp4lsu
Member since Sep 2016
7351 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:31 am to
The diff here is that the SEC didn't set up an immediate vote from the schools to ban players that had a pro-contract. If Sankey was opposed to this and a TRO was enforced to allow Bediako to play, then why didn't Sankey do this rule change in the conference and get a vote then from the schools?
If he had done that then, LSU would've never given a thought to Harris and Wright. But LSU try something similar with Harris and Wright and he calls an emergency session to have a vote on a rule change. These were guys that haven't played in any games and were cut in mini-camps.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
90070 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:31 am to
quote:

I know that Sankey filed an affidavit strongly opposing the ruling


For show.
Posted by Herman
PRAIRIEVILLE, La
Member since Feb 2018
881 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:39 am to
The rules were different then said Sankey
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
31361 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:41 am to
Didn’t they go to great lengths a couple weeks ago to say it wasn’t a “new rule” regarding pro players, and they were only reiterating what was already in place?
Posted by Switchup91
Member since Sep 2021
100 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:42 am to
LSU is not suing the SEC. The players are. This has virtually nothing to do with LSU.
Posted by Jim Hopper
Ocean Springs Mississippi
Member since Sep 2019
5424 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:44 am to
quote:

The “rule” was supposedly not in place so they were not in violation of any SEC rules. Did they have to forfeit those games?
technically there were already rules about players being ineligible because of money payments but new laws had to be written to distinguish between professional athletes and NIL athletes. Still Bama and oats did technically break the rules but sankey is a hypocrite.
Posted by Demonbengal
Ruston
Member since May 2015
5881 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:47 am to
The lawsuit by Wright and Harris will be interesting. I don’t know that the SEC can easily explain away the Bediako situation. Other situations like Trinidad Chambliss getting a 6th year after being denied twice will be tough as well. I really don’t want ex pro’s coming back, but their has to be consistency on the issue.
Posted by White Tiger
Dallas
Member since Jul 2007
15915 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:48 am to
That should bring into sharp relief the spirits animating the SEC’s lawsuit against LSU.
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
49217 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 9:31 am to
quote:

The rules were different then said Sankey



He did not say that; he is saying the rules have always been what they are now. He did file a brief opposing Bediako, and ultimately they won. Plus, it's basketball. It will never rise to the level of football in how the SEC views anything.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram