Started By
Message

re: Big10/ACC Scrambling To Pass Anti-2022 Class Legislation, SEC Expected to Discuss Today

Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:35 am to
Posted by LSBoosie
Member since Jun 2020
20431 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:35 am to
quote:

Does the B1G have a rule against stealing teams plays and a 24 year old roster?

Huh?
Posted by saturncube21
Member since Nov 2015
12204 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:37 am to
Will not affect the 2022 TROs
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
70744 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:38 am to
This whole "issue" is not an issue at all. It's a one-off mess created by the NCAA's incompetence. If they granted the class of 2022 the same eligibility as they're giving other classes, few to none of these kids would have gone pro. They had no other choice since they were out of eligibility.
Posted by LSBoosie
Member since Jun 2020
20431 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:41 am to
quote:

This whole "issue" is not an issue at all. It's a one-off mess created by the NCAA's incompetence. If they granted the class of 2022 the same eligibility as they're giving other classes, few to none of these kids would have gone pro. They had no other choice since they were out of eligibility.

Except for RJ Luis
Posted by yadaddy
Member since Feb 2023
118 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:42 am to
Actually not opposed to this IF they simultaneously rule that you cannot play if you 1. have ever signed an NFL contract or declared for the draft, and/or 2. have already exhausted your 5 years of eligibility.

This fixes the NFL issue and fixes the issue of players like Chambliss and Johnson who are ineligible per the 5 for 5 ruling from playing as well.
Posted by Triple Bogey
19th Green
Member since May 2017
6943 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:44 am to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


quote:

Sure some may think these men are just doing what's best for their team to win games and boost their own egos. But clearly these 2 men care about helping these young men get a second chance.

In a time when young men are exiting the workforce, our guys are stepping up, lending a hand and picking up these disenfranchised young men and putting them on a better path.

Some would call them a hero, we are lucky to call them coach.





Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
70744 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:45 am to
quote:

Except for RJ Luis

Is he not also in the class of 2022? Seems logical that 5 years is 5 years no matter what. These same protections aren't likely to apply to class of 23, 24, etc.
Posted by LSBoosie
Member since Jun 2020
20431 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:47 am to
quote:

Is he not also in the class of 2022? Seems logical that 5 years is 5 years no matter what. These same protections aren't likely to apply to class of 23, 24, etc.

You said “They had no other choice since they were out of eligibility.” That does not apply to him. He chose to go pro while he still had eligibility left.
Posted by Jabontik
Houston
Member since Dec 2016
4944 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:49 am to
The B1G and the SEC are about to find out what the NCAA already has: This is America, you cannot frick with a person's right to make money
Posted by WAC13
Member since Jan 2017
1225 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:49 am to
Sankey and the SEC has a chance to do the funniest thing right now.
Posted by Kool Kaliper
Mansfield, TX
Member since Nov 2018
4067 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:55 am to
Pack that shite up boys, it was good while it lasted. Grand Open, Grand Closing....
Posted by Giantkiller
the internet.
Member since Sep 2007
26238 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:55 am to
These players left school because they had to leave school. Did the NCAA expect them to just sit there and keep their amateur status on the hopes of winning the suit? They went pro because they weren't given a choice.

If that's the way it is, I'm fine with making these players ineligible. But you either grandfather this rule to take effect starting NEXT season, or you make Chambliss ineligible too.
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
11252 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 10:03 am to
I think a simple rule would be once you sign a professional contract in a sport like football you are permanently illegible to play that sport in college. How many years eligibility you have shouldn't matter once you sign a pro contract.

He signed a contract and he was cut. I feel bad for him, but there's the CFL, UFL, and semi-pro football where he can play and work on his game.
Posted by BigShowGeaux
USA
Member since Jan 2021
289 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 10:11 am to
I'm just curious what they think about all the overseas "pros" that have been playing college basketball for years? They can't pick and choose on this.

They are so shortsighted, and that is why you are having all of these issues in college sports right now.
Posted by Buga
Member since Dec 2013
1736 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 10:14 am to
quote:

How many years eligibility you have shouldn't matter once you sign a pro contract.


Unless you didn't know you had eligibility left.
Most of these players probably knew they wouldn't get drafted and would be cut as a free agent. Almost all of them would have come back for their last year had the been given the option in January.
This post was edited on 8/25/26 at 10:17 am
Posted by LSURulzSEC
Lake Charles via Oakdale
Member since Aug 2004
80091 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 10:15 am to
quote:

I think a simple rule would be once you sign a professional contract in a sport like football you are permanently illegible to play that sport in college. How many years eligibility you have shouldn't matter once you sign a pro contract.


That’s is the problem, many of these players had no choice at the time, had the NCAA dropped this ruling, which they knew they were going to do, many of these players would have come back for their 5th season.

Also had the NCAA dropped the ruling after the season began, this would have been avoided…

The NCAA is just incompetent all around…
Posted by CWILKS3
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2020
1256 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 10:17 am to
Not to defend OM or Chambliss, but he could’ve gone to be a top 3 round pick and he stayed and fought for his case (which I disagree he should be eligible).

These players had this same option to do this over the course of the spring and summer and not 2 weeks before the season starts. This is objectively ridiculous, regardless if LSU is benefitting from it or not.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
39527 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 10:23 am to
We aren’t the heels.


We are the heroes.




And funny the big ten gets on their moral high horse and complies with this but has a crazy amount of sexual abuse scandals


We make sure our athletes can get a degree and afford some pizzas yet that makes us bad people
This post was edited on 8/25/26 at 10:24 am
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
26247 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 10:32 am to
Yea the big 10 is laughable considering the scandals they have had are actual real legit dirty serious scandals. The lesser dirty one being Michigan with Moore hot dogging it up, the difference when a lesser sec team with a much better coach had a similar situation Arkansas fired him immediately. They didn’t sit on it until he had a losing year and have their AD have to resign because he knew about it.

Of course the big 10 also has Michigan state and Pedo state with much worse scandals than paying a kid or bringing back kids that should have had an extra year.
Posted by Buga
Member since Dec 2013
1736 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 11:12 am to
quote:

These players had this same option to do this over the course of the spring and summer and not 2 weeks before the season starts.


No they didn't.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram