- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anybody here still think O was a bad hire?
Posted on 10/16/19 at 12:29 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Posted on 10/16/19 at 12:29 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
I'm still not over the UAB loss.
Winning the SEC the next year got me over that loss. What has O won?
Posted on 10/16/19 at 12:29 pm to The Shed
quote:
Anybody here still think O was a bad hire?
I wasn't thrilled about O at the time but if you could find my old comments and posts from social media you'd see that I was VERY thrilled that we didn't hire that clown Jimbo!
Posted on 10/16/19 at 12:31 pm to The Shed
I don't, but a loss to MSST or not scoring on bama could change things in a flash.
It is what it is.
It is what it is.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 12:31 pm to MountainTiger
quote:
It was a bad hire that is working out way better than anyone thought it would.
That's a bit of a stretch. I was vocal at the time that Dabo had provided the blueprint for what a program could look like with a guy like Orgeron at the helm, and didn't think that there was a clear cut option better than him that was available. Given how he had performed in interim roles I was comfortable saying he had grown since OM, and would hire good assistants. It wasn't a splash hire but there were objective reasons to argue for and against at the time.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 12:31 pm to tigerpawl
quote:
He has somehow managed to surround himself with excellent assistants. Total coaching staff performance has exceeded my expectations. I can't help but think there is some wizard in the background pulling his strings. He's not smart enough to assemble this group by his own hand. Just a hunch..
This post was edited on 10/16/19 at 12:32 pm
Posted on 10/16/19 at 12:32 pm to memphis tiger
quote:
I disagree that there was little risk.
Sure we got him for cheap but had he flamed our like he did at Ole Miss, it could have set the program back for a decade or more.
Just look at Tennessee.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 12:33 pm to memphis tiger
quote:
I disagree that there was little risk.
I didn’t say little risk.
I just think it was evident he was a better coach than his ole miss days, and interim stints at superior programs supported that.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 12:33 pm to GeauxTigerNation
quote:
If you unfortunate enough to visit the tiger rant scoreboard on a gameday during the opponents offensive drives, you will see a large flock of them.
Then they vanish, only to be seen on the next opposing first down
So you're basically describing the rant on any given game day for any given sport, regardless of who is coaching. Because, the rant always knows what's best for everyone and everything!
Posted on 10/16/19 at 12:35 pm to TheDrunkenTigah
quote:
Dabo had provided the blueprint for what a program could look like with a guy like Orgeron at the helm,
Can you expand on this? just curious
Posted on 10/16/19 at 12:35 pm to The Shed
I was wrong and now very glad we have him.
I still hate Alleva though. The search was a joke
I still hate Alleva though. The search was a joke
Posted on 10/16/19 at 12:37 pm to TheDrunkenTigah
quote:
It wasn't a splash hire but there were objective reasons to argue for and against at the time.
Nope he can't grow. Anything that happened at OM must happen again. OM is who he is. USC and LSU jobs are false indicators. (sarc)
Posted on 10/16/19 at 12:38 pm to omegaman66
Here’s the way I see it. LSU, especially on offense, needed a radical shake up. For better or worse, nobody with the decision to hire had the balls to hire a HEAD COACH that would come in on day one and do that. Furthermore, a lot of such possibilities (I’m not even sure who they would be offhand - not Jimbo or even Herman) would be people would have flipped out over every bit as much as O, and likely been every much a gamble.
However, that has now actually occurred and accounting for the fact that it took two years to happen, that is what ORGERON has given us.
Unless something drastically flips back around, this seems about the best result possible. Jimbo seems completely lacking in drive and Herman seems to be missing something in his approach.
However, that has now actually occurred and accounting for the fact that it took two years to happen, that is what ORGERON has given us.
Unless something drastically flips back around, this seems about the best result possible. Jimbo seems completely lacking in drive and Herman seems to be missing something in his approach.
This post was edited on 10/16/19 at 12:42 pm
Posted on 10/16/19 at 12:40 pm to SpencerRob
quote:
You can’t judge a hire the instant it’s made
Of course I can. I'm a grown arse man. What's wrong with judging a hire when it's made. Just like I can judge an elected official as soon as they are elected or I can judge any person as soon as I see them for the first time. My opinion may change based on performance but that certainly doesn't mean that I shouldn't judge them initially.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 12:41 pm to SpencerRob
quote:
A hire should be judged on the results it yields. You can’t judge a hire the instant it’s made.
It's the other way around. You can only use information available at the time of the decision to judge whether it was a good or bad one. The decision maker can't see into the future so anything that happens after the decision is made could not have been known at the time.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 12:41 pm to The Shed
The world’s worst AD conducted the most sloppy, amateurish, halfassed search and hired the least sought after candidate. Anyone who thought that was a great idea from the beginning was not thinking with their brain. ...And the “give him a chance” chant was infuriating. As if any multimillion dollar position should be filled arbitrarily and validated after the fact.
All that said I’m happy with what he has done this year. The true validation of his hire will be can we beat Bama or get into a playoff. But he’s definitely earned more time to try to do that.
All that said I’m happy with what he has done this year. The true validation of his hire will be can we beat Bama or get into a playoff. But he’s definitely earned more time to try to do that.
This post was edited on 10/16/19 at 12:43 pm
Posted on 10/16/19 at 12:41 pm to OceanMan
quote:
I just think it was evident he was a better coach than his ole miss days, and interim stints at superior programs supported that.
Being interim coach is very different than being permanent head coach.
One is supposed to build and maintain the program and one is a bandaid just trying to slow down the bleeding.
O had proven to be great at the latter. Nothing in his history suggested he could do the former.
But to his credit, he’s changed and no one should complain about what he’s done since the offseason.
This post was edited on 10/16/19 at 12:46 pm
Posted on 10/16/19 at 12:43 pm to nitwit
So it wasn't a good hire by objective standards like say, Curley Hallman at LSU, Charlie Strong at texas, Rich Rodriguez at Michigan, Charlie Weis at Notre Dame or Kansas, Mike Dubose at Alabama, Larry Coker at Miami, etc....
Was Dabo considered a good hire at Clemson? Les Miles at LSU? I remember how everybody in Miami reacted when Howard Schnellenberger left for the USFL after a NC and they hired a coach with a 29-25-3 at Oklahoma State named Jimmy Johnson. And when JJ left what was the most dominant program in the nation he was replaced with Dennis Erickson and his career 50-31-1 record. Objective standards are great but getting the right fit is more important.
Was Dabo considered a good hire at Clemson? Les Miles at LSU? I remember how everybody in Miami reacted when Howard Schnellenberger left for the USFL after a NC and they hired a coach with a 29-25-3 at Oklahoma State named Jimmy Johnson. And when JJ left what was the most dominant program in the nation he was replaced with Dennis Erickson and his career 50-31-1 record. Objective standards are great but getting the right fit is more important.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 12:50 pm to The Shed
He’s doing a great job this season. Year 1 was disappointing on different levels. Last season was a step in the right direction. He’s got to keep recruiting at the highest of levels and nail his staff hires. Brady was obviously a homerun.
Popular
Back to top


2









