Started By
Message

re: All WW Had To Do Was Attend A Meeting

Posted on 4/11/19 at 4:56 pm to
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79430 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 4:56 pm to
I think the situation with the federal case changed
Posted by Irish LSU Fan
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2014
2456 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

Man you’ve been saying he’s guilty since the start of all this with nothing to base it on but an assumption.

I have NEVER said that WW is guilty. To the contrary, I have said that I hope this gets resolved with WW as our coach. I think WW is a true stubborn knucklehead for refusing to meet (at least I hope that's all it is). If he did not meet because of stubbornness or bad advice, let's get him back on board ASAP. If he did not meet because he is guilty, I wish him well at his next job.
Posted by ellessuuuu
Member since Sep 2004
9534 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 5:00 pm to
Just stop responding this this childish person and maybe he'll go away.
Posted by Irish LSU Fan
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2014
2456 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

I think the situation with the federal case changed


What situation? He was/is just a (possible) witness. If WW is innocent, the trial has no impact on WW's situation with LSU.
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
32257 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 5:05 pm to
You really are clueless.

You fit the old adage so well...you’ve removed all doubt, you are a fool
Posted by magicman0001
Orange, Texas
Member since Dec 2008
1157 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 5:08 pm to
quote:

WW does not get to set parameters for his bosses meeting.


Again.. None of that bullshite matters when you've been subpoenaed to testify in a Fed trial and the subject of the trial is what you're asked to "discuss" with the AD/Pres and a 3rd party.

You don't talk about it if your legal council tells you not to. It wasn't about being innocent or guilty. You simply don't discuss information pertaining to a trial you may be testifying in until it's safe to do so.
Posted by zsav77
Member since Oct 2011
6280 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

Irish LSU Fan


Hopefully you fit the stereotype and are posting in a constant state of drunkenness... otherwise you’re a complete imbecile.
Posted by Irish LSU Fan
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2014
2456 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

he had advice not to and their is more to this story he was told by fbi to keep quiet

Wrong. Maybe wishful thinking on your part to explain why WW refused to meet with his boss.
Posted by Irish LSU Fan
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2014
2456 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

You simply don't discuss information pertaining to a trial you may be testifying in until it's safe to do so.

So, what has changed? Nothing. Why is his current lawyer going against YOUR legal advice? I guess he just has a bad lawyer.
Posted by tigerfan0082
Member since Oct 2011
705 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 5:14 pm to
Wow, I hope you don’t believe all that nonsense you just threw-up. Always, always listen to your legal counsel. Period. End of story.
Posted by Nix to Twillie
Houston, TX
Member since Jan 2015
20380 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

As an employee, he is required to attend any meeting his boss schedules. WW does not get to set parameters for his bosses meeting.


So he should be fired then, right? Yet he’s still on the job and is likely to be reinstated soon. What does that mean about everything you just said?
Posted by la_birdman
Northern GA via Lake Charles
Member since Feb 2005
32133 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

I have NEVER said that WW is guilty. To the contrary, I have said that I hope this gets resolved with WW as our coach. I think WW is a true stubborn knucklehead for refusing to meet (at least I hope that's all it is). If he did not meet because of stubbornness or bad advice, let's get him back on board ASAP. If he did not meet because he is guilty, I wish him well at his next job.



You never said it but you insinuate it in every post you make about the man.


Look at your posts in this thread, perfect example.

“He must cooperate otherwise fire him, blah blah blah”


And one thing I have yet to see you acknowledge is that he in fact is attending a meeting tomorrow (which is the title of your thread, correct?) with Alleva and others.


So leave it at that.


Geez man


This post was edited on 4/11/19 at 5:36 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138902 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

All WW Had To Do Was Attend A Meeting
The first couple of times you posted this nonsense you came across as silly, and clueless as to legal the constraints involved. Folks here explained the situation to you. But after having been corrected multiple times, yet reposting the same screed, you now appear to be an uneducable imbecile.
Posted by KC Tiger
Member since Sep 2006
5004 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

When you sign a contract, you follow the contract. WW thinks he can rewrite his contract at any time. WW is REQUIRED to cooperate with the NCAA, LSU and the SEC in all investigations, etc. As an employee, he is required to attend any meeting his boss schedules. WW does not get to set parameters for his bosses meeting.



Like it or not, this is true.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138902 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

When you sign a contract, you follow the contract
You mention contracts without any apparent basis for the notion
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 5:34 pm to
Yeah, he didn't make great decisions (his 'press release' for one) but I give Wade a pass because he's young, and relatively inexperienced at this level.

My hope is that he remembers this, learns his lesson, and applies it towards the rest of a very long career at LSU.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290876 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

Without representation
After he originally agreed and the meeting time was changed
With a 3rd party present and their counsel
While he is a witness in a federal case that he can’t talk about
While said boss has legal representation

Am I missing any other stipulations?



Lol 22 people upvoted this posts full of bad information
Posted by More&Les
Member since Nov 2012
14684 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

. ALL WW HAD TO DO WAS MEET WITH HIS BOSS. WE COULD HAVE BEEN IN THE FINAL FOUR AND WHO KNOWS WHAT.



All his boss has to do was not try to set him (WW) up for the fall in order to cover his (JA) own arse.

It can't be overstated how fricking bad LSU Athletic Department handled this shite, and in the end, nothing WW said was admission of any violations, Smart was cleared to play and LSU was forced to play in the SEC and NCAA tournament without their coach for no good fricking reason.

Btw, Bruce fricking Pearl still hasn't met with his boss and they didn't try to sandbag him with the ncaa.

As a matter of fact, gfy.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
42280 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 5:40 pm to
All JA has to do was wait for the federal case to be over and not invite the NCAA in
Posted by Irish LSU Fan
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2014
2456 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

You mention contracts without any apparent basis for the notion

Both coaches and universities are contractually required to cooperate with all investigations (both formal and informal). WW violated his contract by refusing to cooperate (attend a meeting).
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram