Started By
Message

re: MBB Offseason '26 Transfer Portal / HS Tracker

Posted on 10/16/26 at 4:17 pm to
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
83644 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 4:17 pm to
Lets geaux!

Id say lets wait till april to appeal this case ncaa
Posted by sppy1
Sugar Land, Texas
Member since Nov 2012
194 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 4:59 pm to
Posted by purplengold1
Illinois
Member since Feb 2009
5816 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 5:44 pm to
Guilbeau is such a fricking loser.
Posted by ParkerEdwards4Prez
337
Member since Apr 2026
55 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 6:46 pm to
quote:

Unfortunately for Wade, Hsu played four seasons at Cabrini College in Radnor, Pennsylvania, from 1999-2003, so he has no eligibility remaining. Unless, of course, he sues the NCAA for a fifth season, which has been granted to college athletes who began their careers in 2023 and not before.

Wow. Stray from hell lmao.
Posted by Classy Doge
Member since Nov 2021
5709 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 8:01 pm to
Damn I would have never clicked your link if I'd known it was a GG article
Posted by ellessuuuu
Member since Sep 2004
9709 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 8:48 pm to
Good to see our local media has followed this team close enough to realize that Clark is now eligible.
Posted by Lapaz
Member since Dec 2018
954 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 9:40 pm to
quote:

If Niang is ineligible under the SEC rule then so is the Kentucky player Ousmane N'Diaye who was cleared by the NCAA in the last week. He voluntarily entered the NBA draft and never withdrew. The difference is he went undrafted in 2025.

LINK


Agreed. Niang shouldn't be punished just because he was drafted, while N'Diaye did not get drafted. If their actions were the same, then an external party's actions shouldn't punish one, and not the other. Either both are ineligible or neither should be.
This post was edited on 10/17/26 at 7:00 am
Posted by AlecRock23
Central, LA
Member since Mar 2015
2867 posts
Posted on 10/19/26 at 9:29 am to
Will Clark play on Saturday vs FSU?
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
83644 posts
Posted on 10/19/26 at 9:32 am to
Dont see why he wouldnt
Posted by ellessuuuu
Member since Sep 2004
9709 posts
Posted on 10/19/26 at 9:46 am to
quote:

Will Clark play on Saturday vs FSU?


Unless there is a stay on the injunction from the appellate court, then he should good to go.
This post was edited on 10/19/26 at 9:47 am
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
176061 posts
Posted on 10/19/26 at 10:12 am to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


I assume the usual suspects are on their knees screaming to the clouds
Posted by TigerCub
Team Boxtard
Member since May 2006
22967 posts
Posted on 10/19/26 at 10:16 am to
Yeah waiting for Pat Forde to express his outrage at Bill Self over this one
Posted by Tigercowboy
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
5234 posts
Posted on 10/19/26 at 10:32 am to
This has to basically seal Niang as eligible.
Posted by LSUFanMizeWay
Picayune MS
Member since Sep 2014
6801 posts
Posted on 10/19/26 at 10:34 am to
Will Clark is 62 Years Old and his sport was Baseball, not Basketball, but I'm sure Wade can get a judge to declare him eligible for 26-27.
Posted by ellessuuuu
Member since Sep 2004
9709 posts
Posted on 10/19/26 at 10:36 am to
quote:

I assume the usual suspects are on their knees screaming to the clouds


The SEC would literally sue us (again) if we signed this player. Yet Auburn has an international basketball player who stayed in the draft (did not withdraw) and was DRAFTED. NCAA approved him and he played Saturday for Auburn. Seemingly no repercussions from the SEC.
This post was edited on 10/19/26 at 10:41 am
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
18163 posts
Posted on 10/19/26 at 11:20 am to
This guy is Class of 2021. So zero reason why he should be eligible, he doesn't meet qualifications for 5-for-5 or the old eligibility rules.
Posted by Pnels08
Member since Jul 2014
10743 posts
Posted on 10/19/26 at 11:29 am to
quote:

Yet Auburn has an international basketball player who stayed in the draft (did not withdraw) and was DRAFTED.



Lmao wait what. Didn't know that. Then are we only worried about Niang because he might have made so much money?
Posted by ellessuuuu
Member since Sep 2004
9709 posts
Posted on 10/19/26 at 11:39 am to
quote:

Lmao wait what. Didn't know that. Then are we only worried about Niang because he might have made so much money?


Niang should be fine. Dessert may be close on income. If there are any concerns on Levy, would think it’s age.
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
21954 posts
Posted on 10/19/26 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

This guy is Class of 2021. So zero reason why he should be eligible, he doesn't meet qualifications for 5-for-5 or the old eligibility rules.


Yep. Already had 5 years. It's just a matter of time before he loses his temporary eligibility.
Posted by Lapaz
Member since Dec 2018
954 posts
Posted on 10/19/26 at 12:40 pm to
quote:


This has to basically seal Niang as eligible.


Kaufman's TRO is based on the NCAA's 5 for 5 rule. I don't think he'll win his case to get a 6th year, since the 5 for 5 eliminates the red shirt. You don't get 5 years plus a red shirt.

It won't help Niang, because Niang's case is against the SEC draft withdrawal rule, not the NCAA's 5 for 5 rule. The eligibility of Kentucky's N'Diaye is the one that should help Niang. The SEC's justification to give N'Diaye eligibility and not Niang is very weak.
first pageprev pagePage 187 of 198Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram