- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New PGA Tour - 15 to 18 events
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:23 pm to tdme
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:23 pm to tdme
I don’t care for Rolapp at all. His success isn’t debatable, but I don’t think he’s the right man for the PGA. Then again, I’ve never thought there were too many tournaments. I love having golf to look forward to weekly and can’t understand why they’d frick with such a successful formula. Sure I want to see the top players perform, but the tour is so loaded with talent that you get good golf even when the top 20 the a week off. And it gives those lower ranked guys a chance to shine.
In essence, less golf isn’t what I want as a fan.
In essence, less golf isn’t what I want as a fan.
Posted on 6/5/26 at 7:58 pm to bstaceyau19
quote:
This whole affair seems greedy, arrogant, and over the top. It comes across as absorbing the LIV attitude of "do what we want, tradition and the good of the game be damned." They beat LIV so they feel invincible. As a golf fan, it's short-sighted and worrisome.
I’ve always felt that the pkayers should give more back to the game. They should have guaranteed that the best golfers would play in every tour event at least once every 5 or 6 years.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 8:54 am to doubleb
quote:
In its release, the PGA Tour said it has already identified 10 of its 15 Championship Series regular-season tournaments for the 2028 season. The current eight signature events -- AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am, Genesis Invitational, Arnold Palmer Invitational, RBC Heritage, Cadillac Championship, Truist Championship, Memorial Tournament and Travelers Championship -- are expected to remain part of the future schedule.
The tour is targeting larger markets such as Boston, Denver, New York, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Seattle and Washington, D.C., to fill out the remaining five spots in the calendar. The tour is beginning to finalize the markets, courses, dates and sponsors for the remaining tournaments.
LINK
Posted on 6/23/26 at 8:59 am to DestrehanTiger
It sounds like the Track 1 guys won’t be allowed to play down to Track 2
Posted on 6/23/26 at 9:03 am to m57
Brutal for the events that are getting demoted, which are a lot of them.
I think the events on the lower track will end up being pretty transient events similar to the Korn Ferry where the sponsors and locations change frequently. Houston will obviously be on the lower track, I am curious to see if it stays at Memorial (or in Houston at all long term)
I think the events on the lower track will end up being pretty transient events similar to the Korn Ferry where the sponsors and locations change frequently. Houston will obviously be on the lower track, I am curious to see if it stays at Memorial (or in Houston at all long term)
This post was edited on 6/23/26 at 9:04 am
Posted on 6/23/26 at 9:06 am to bstaceyau19
This is NASCAR level frickery by the PGA
NASCAR was hugely popular in the early 2000's and they started fricking with the schedule and postseason format, now it is on life support
NASCAR was hugely popular in the early 2000's and they started fricking with the schedule and postseason format, now it is on life support
Posted on 6/23/26 at 9:24 am to slinger1317
quote:
NASCAR was hugely popular in the early 2000's and they started fricking with the schedule and postseason format, now it is on life support
NASCAR is definitely not on life support, but their rating certainly are no where near they were in that era.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 9:26 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
The tour is targeting larger markets such as Boston, Denver, New York, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Seattle and Washington, D.C.,
Can someone explain why this is important to them? Maybe sponsors are requesting it?
This post was edited on 6/23/26 at 9:27 am
Posted on 6/23/26 at 9:30 am to Tyga Woods
I think that’s the case. Sponsors and their willingness to put up big money will be what determines the markets and events that are on the higher track
Posted on 6/23/26 at 11:12 am to bstaceyau19
Delete
This post was edited on 6/23/26 at 11:36 am
Posted on 6/23/26 at 12:17 pm to DestrehanTiger
quote:
I am on board with pretty much all of their proposals with the exception of the big market events. If big cities were good for tournaments, they'd already have them. If Chicago happens to be a great spot for a tournament, good, but don't force it.
Charlie Hoffman talked about exactly this on a podcast with Kisner. He basically said the events in large-metro cities id not do nearly as well as the events in smaller cities/towns. There's just so much else to do in large cities and other sports being played when, compared to a smaller place, the PGA event is the biggest thing going on and more people come out.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 12:25 pm to bstaceyau19
quote:
I hope the players push back on this. Not all of them want to play a limited schedule.
idk, with how big the purses are now, the need to grind and play 30 tournaments a year is going away. It's only June and there are already 90 players who have won a million on tour this season. And if tier 1 has 20 million purses every week, then why would any of those guys want to play in more golf tournaments?
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:05 pm to lsufball19
The events in the large cities will have Smaller crowds probably higher TV ratings. It’s all about TV money and sponsorships. They don’t really care about local charities and the local golf fan.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:15 pm to bstaceyau19
Something tells me this structure may not exactly become a reality. The marketability of pro golf really does revolve around the top 20 or 30 guys. And one of the things those guys value more than anything is flexibility of their schedule as they see fit. It's a feature of Golf as an individual sport.
So the tour thinks they're gonna be able to dictate to Scottie Scheffler that he CANNOT play in the tournament in his hometown because it's been relegated? There's a lot of other situations like that I think are problematic with this proposed format.
So the tour thinks they're gonna be able to dictate to Scottie Scheffler that he CANNOT play in the tournament in his hometown because it's been relegated? There's a lot of other situations like that I think are problematic with this proposed format.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:22 pm to Optimism
quote:
will have Smaller crowds probably higher TV ratings.
why would an event in a larger city have better tv ratings? This isn't like the SEC trying to extend their footprint into a state to get the Missouri television audience to watch SEC games now that Missouri is in the SEC. The PGA isn't going to get a boost in eyes because the tournament is in Boston as opposed to Dublin, OH. Golf gets eyeballs when the fields are good, the course has "history," and the leaderboard is tight (and which players are on top). The size of the city the tournament is in is largely inconsequential
This post was edited on 6/23/26 at 1:24 pm
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:29 pm to Brightside Bengal
Maybe allow Tier 1 players to play in up to 4 Tier 2 events (pick a number) of their choosing. Allows some flexibility and the crossover helps connect the two tours.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:32 pm to lsufball19
quote:
And if tier 1 has 20 million purses every week, then why would any of those guys want to play in more golf tournaments?
For more money
Pretty simple.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:40 pm to CPA Yung Boi
quote:
For more money
Pretty simple.
there are very few grinders left on the PGA Tour because the money is so much better now. If you more than double the purses, they have even less incentive to need or want to grind. The only ones who would want to would be guys trying to manufacture points or get easier wins to get into majors.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:41 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
or in Houston at all long term
Crane spent a fortune on Memorial Park Golf. I'm sure he will not like to be relegated to the Tier 2, although the Houston stop isn't a priority for the top of the Tour.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:43 pm to lsufball19
quote:
there are very few grinders left on the PGA Tour because the money is so much better now. If you more than double the purses, they have even less incentive to need or want to grind. The only ones who would want to would be guys trying to manufacture points or get easier wins to get into majors.
The guys that don’t need money now won’t need money in 2028. Your complaint makes no sense.
You can’t say there’s no grinders now and then complain there won’t be any grinders once the money changes.
There’s almost no change happening for the best players in the world under the new model. You know, they guys with all the money already
This post was edited on 6/23/26 at 1:44 pm
Popular
Back to top


0





