- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Non-Official Battlefield 2042 Thread - I have retired as this thread's keeper...
Posted on 1/21/21 at 9:42 am to CornDogCologne
Posted on 1/21/21 at 9:42 am to CornDogCologne
Battlefield 1 was a very solid game. Dog fights and sniping were enjoyable.
Also congrats on the marriage.
Also congrats on the marriage.
1
Posted on 1/21/21 at 9:43 am to UltimateHog
quote:
It's also believed that part of the team that was working on BC3 are working on BF3 Remastered.
Lawddddddddddddd
Posted on 1/21/21 at 9:53 am to LewDawg
quote:
Sounds like MAG
That game was awesome and too ahead of its time. I miss those massive battles.
Posted on 1/21/21 at 10:00 am to geauxtigers87
Vietnam would work better as an expansion pack like thet did with Bad Company 2
Posted on 1/21/21 at 10:17 am to burgeman
I enjoyed 1 but it just didn’t have the same staying power as 3&4 for me. Their design feels too arcade-y as the series went on. Call of duty was always better at that style of gameplay, bf needed to stick with a more tactical approach in my opinion.
And thanks, all’s going well with married life so far.
And thanks, all’s going well with married life so far.
Posted on 1/21/21 at 10:19 am to CornDogCologne
Wait until some twins randomly pop up
Posted on 1/21/21 at 10:20 am to CornDogCologne
I think 1 was great. I don't think there was anything wrong with that game or model, other than I just don't think WW1 has that staying power for long term pvp. I played a ton of that game, but never really had a squad to play with because most of my friends still wanted a modern BF and got tired of 1 quickly.
Posted on 1/21/21 at 10:26 am to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
I played a ton of that game, but never really had a squad to play with because most of my friends still wanted a modern BF and got tired of 1 quickly.
Same, almost bought it on PC this week just to play again.
This post was edited on 1/21/21 at 10:29 am
Posted on 1/21/21 at 10:31 am to burgeman
I played 1 a lot more than V.
Posted on 1/21/21 at 10:34 am to finchmeister08
128 player matches in Battlefield sound incredible. I've always been one for huge multiplayer team matches, but battle royale isnt the same since its not team oriented. Hope these 128 player matches can be successful and promote a good team oriented environment instead of lots of skirmishes on a too spread out map
Posted on 1/21/21 at 10:41 am to burgeman
quote:
Same, almost bought it on PC this week just to play again.
Up until this year, I'd still hop on 4 on xbox just to get a quick fix.
Posted on 1/21/21 at 10:44 am to Upperdecker
quote:
Hope these 128 player matches can be successful and promote a good team oriented environment instead of lots of skirmishes on a too spread out map
When it gets this big, it honestly makes the games "smaller" to a degree, unless it is a map like metro or something where it is just a giant clusterfrick. I enjoy both. It is a lot of fun on these larger scale type games to where it just seems like your squad going and trying to make maneuvers or maybe you decide one point is your point, and your squad is holding it against anything the other team tries to bring. It is a very unique dynamic you don't get in a lot of games.
Posted on 1/21/21 at 11:37 am to dcrews
quote:
Battlefield Bad Company 2: Vietnam Expansion... hands down the most fun FPS I've ever played to date.
If EA still had the servers up, I'd still be playing it.
Loved this and also the 1943 air combat
Posted on 1/21/21 at 11:38 am to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
It is a lot of fun on these larger scale type games to where it just seems like your squad going and trying to make maneuvers or maybe you decide one point is your point, and your squad is holding it against anything the other team tries to bring. It is a very unique dynamic you don't get in a lot of games.
I wonder if the squad will be upped to 8 if there's 128 players. The conquest maps are going to probably be the biggest ever and a squad of 8 would create awesome fights over flags.
If BF6 is going to be like BF3, I am in. I never even played BFV since it looked terrible from day one. I've been on COD since MW, but I miss BF and the destructible environments.
Posted on 1/21/21 at 11:48 am to JimMorrison
quote:
I wonder if the squad will be upped to 8 if there's 128 players. The conquest maps are going to probably be the biggest ever and a squad of 8 would create awesome fights over flags.
That would be a phenomenal change I would think. I can just imagine a little 8v8 skirmish for a flag, then all of a sudden another squad or two swoop in on both sides and it is just full on mayhem.
Posted on 1/21/21 at 7:48 pm to geauxtigers87
quote:
want another BF Vietnam
That game was bad arse. Damn I loved it.
Posted on 1/21/21 at 7:53 pm to finchmeister08
I have a want to play Operation Metro
Posted on 1/22/21 at 12:05 am to Oates Mustache
This.
Posted on 2/3/21 at 1:39 pm to SEC. 593
Posted on 2/5/21 at 8:00 pm to JimMorrison
Someone with ‘insider info’ said there will be 4 squads under control of a ‘commander’. Squads will still be 4 players. So one player will essentially be able to command 4 squads or 16 players.
Makes sense because with 128 players it will be hard to take objectives with only 4 people working together.
Here is video: LINK
Makes sense because with 128 players it will be hard to take objectives with only 4 people working together.
Here is video: LINK
Page 2 of 24
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News