Posted by
Message
sicboy
Oregon State Fan
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
60239 posts

re: Bad news...no Bad Company, BF going back to WWII
That's never in doubt with BF games.




At least not yet.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
00
Blitzed
George Mason Fan
Member since Oct 2009
16897 posts

re: Bad news...no Bad Company, BF going back to WWII
Im legitimately pissed. I won't be able to play one of the best shooters because it is being held hostage.

5 years later.

EA: " DICE, the fans are on to us and they are about to make a push into the building. How is the hostage? It is our only fricking way of making it out of this alive. "

DICE: " Hostage is on standby boss. What do we do? What do we do? We don't want to lose our jobs.

EA: " Do you think we can hold them off with a battlefield 4 remaster?"

DICE: ::mumblesinthebackground:: " Can EA hear us?"

" No paul ive got hand over the phone."

" For fricks sake peter why did you let this company buy us out?"

EA: " Hello....." We can barely her you?"

DICE: " Shut the frick up steve, don't act like you wouldn't have sold out. Plus they promised us Battlefront."

" How has that worked out for us Paul?"

EA: " Hello?:

DICE: " Sorry..Yes boss, we do not believe that a remaster of battlefield 4 will stop the madness."

EA:...................."Well then we have no choice......................we are going code red..."

DICE: " Does that mean...."

EA: " Yes release the hostage. Call gamestop and the press...we will announce BC3.."

DICE: ::handsoverphone:: " Thank god steve...we are going to be okay..tell your family we are going to be okay!"

EA: " Oh and don't forget to add micro-transactions and loot crates.."

DICE:

Image: https://media.giphy.com/media/NGIfqtcS81qi4/giphy.gif


GoCrazyAuburn
Auburn Fan
Staring up at Vulcan's ass
Member since Feb 2010
24848 posts

re: Bad news...no Bad Company, BF going back to WWII
quote:

Bad Company should have been the in between. There was no need to stick to the old school for two straight installments. I really don't get it.


This. The gamers want some variety. Now would be perfect for a good modern shooter. Let WWII be the one after that. Then go to a somewhat modern or maybe like a Vietnam era.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
00
The Sad Banana
Chicago Cubs Fan
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
88953 posts

re: Bad news...no Bad Company, BF going back to WWII
It’s not tho, sic. BF4 is very deferent.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
02
bluebarracuda
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2011
11697 posts

re: Bad news...no Bad Company, BF going back to WWII
quote:


How many times do I have to tell you that's essentially what BF4 is?


shut your whore mouth


sicboy
Oregon State Fan
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
60239 posts

re: Bad news...no Bad Company, BF going back to WWII
There's nothing that 3 did that I feel I don't get out of 4. If you want to go on about the maps, well, that's preference. I loved both, so I'm not trying to jam on 3 at all.


sicboy
Oregon State Fan
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
60239 posts

re: Bad news...no Bad Company, BF going back to WWII


Blitzed
George Mason Fan
Member since Oct 2009
16897 posts

re: Bad news...no Bad Company, BF going back to WWII
Lmao never saw that one.

But I feel like 3 flowed better and had better gunplay. 4 was a little clunky but look i still enjoyed it.


sicboy
Oregon State Fan
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
60239 posts

re: Bad news...no Bad Company, BF going back to WWII
4 had that awful launch but they righted the ship. I'm still playing it.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
10
The Sad Banana
Chicago Cubs Fan
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
88953 posts

re: Bad news...no Bad Company, BF going back to WWII
I love 4, but I’d marry 3 and put the poon on a pedestal. It’s my favorite game EVER.

The feel of BF3 is just so perfect for me. It just checked all the boxes.
This post was edited on 3/1 at 2:54 pm


corndawg85
Mississippi St. Fan
MS
Member since Oct 2013
605 posts

re: Bad news...no Bad Company, BF going back to WWII
I know it gets overplayed but just think of the Operations game mode for the D-Day invasion.


robertLSU
USA Fan
Florida
Member since Jan 2013
416 posts

re: Bad news...no Bad Company, BF going back to WWII
Either way it's not a bf2142 remake so idc


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
10
UltimateHog
Arkansas Fan
Springfield, MO
Member since Dec 2011
50895 posts
 Online 

re: Bad news...no Bad Company, BF going back to WWII
I am actually pretty stoked, I hope this returns to the BF3/4 feeling and just the background for that dev build tells me a little.

Will obviously wait for some more details and gameplay but I am cautiously excited.


saintkenn
Ole Miss Fan
Saintkenn
Member since Nov 2012
363 posts

re: Bad news...no Bad Company, BF going back to WWII
I still miss the USAS and the AN-94 from bf3. Flying the choppies in 4 and absolutely owning the skies is one of my fondest memories from 4. I don't dislike the move to WWII but Battlefield 1 didn't hold my attention like 3 or 4 did.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
00
Korin
Florida Fan
Member since Jan 2014
25595 posts

re: Bad news...no Bad Company, BF going back to WWII
I've had Bad Company 2 for years now and never actually played it. It was during a Steam sale and was priced so low that I bought it just because.
It's too bad they won't remaster 2. I got a lot of mileage out of that game before everyone moved on to 2142 and Call of Duty 4.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
00
pmacattack
Alabama Fan
Member since Oct 2016
789 posts

re: Bad news...no Bad Company, BF going back to WWII
ugh I was hoping for BC3 or vietnam standalone


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
00
theducks
Detroit Mercy Fan
Where The Blazers Play
Member since Aug 2013
6987 posts

re: Bad news...no Bad Company, BF going back to WWII
Sounds like Nostalga.

4 feels like an updated 3.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
00
hg
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Jun 2009
101172 posts

re: Bad news...no Bad Company, BF going back to WWII
Yea I wanted another modern BF, but what could they possibly do that they already haven’t done with BF3 & BF4 without it just being those 2.0?

A BF in the WWII setting will be fun.


sbr2
Member since Apr 2011
14850 posts

re: Bad news...no Bad Company, BF going back to WWII
Well said, arch-nemisis


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
00
sicboy
Oregon State Fan
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
60239 posts

re: Bad news...no Bad Company, BF going back to WWII
quote:

Yea I wanted another modern BF, but what could they possibly do that they already haven’t done with BF3 & BF4 without it just being those 2.0?


But again, BF isn't a yearly installment game. They have time to update and improve upon the formula. I think 4 was so similar to 3 because it was falling right on the edge of current and next gen. Wasn't a lot they were going to be able to do to accomodate both generations of consoles. I feel we're removed enough from 4/Hardline for a modern game to seem fresh and not a carbon copy.


I hope you're right about the WWII game. I like BF1 all right but I still keep going back to 4 because the guns are just so much more fun. We'll see.


first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5next pagelast page

Back to top

logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram