Started By
Message

I made a crockpot mistake. Should I throw this meal out?

Posted on 12/6/23 at 4:01 pm
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
99818 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 4:01 pm
I seared some chicken breasts, threw them in the crock pot, poured some cold broth over them and about 3 hours later I've realized I never plugged the crockpot in.


I lean toward throwing them out. I don't fricks with salmonella. If not for the sear and they were just sitting in cold broth for hours, I might try to salvage. I stuck a probe in one and internal was 78° sooo....


I think I know the answer here but I'm trying to convince myself I don't have to throw out a bunch of meat. What a dumbass.
Posted by Turftoe
Denver
Member since Mar 2016
4219 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 4:03 pm to
what? Eat that shite
Posted by TideSaint
Hill Country
Member since Sep 2008
79720 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 4:08 pm to
Why wouldn't you eat it?
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
99818 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 4:10 pm to
Partially cooked chicken left at room temperature for 3 hours. I have some doubts man.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
43460 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 4:14 pm to
cook it to 165 internal you’ll be fine
Posted by Roy Curado
Member since Jul 2021
1367 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 4:20 pm to
When in doubt, throw it out. Don't chance food poisoning.
Posted by Turftoe
Denver
Member since Mar 2016
4219 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 4:25 pm to
Seeing these discussions about tossing out food always makes me wonder if my upbringing might have been a tad less classy than I realized.
Posted by ThreeBonesCater
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2014
552 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 4:32 pm to
Google 4/40/140 rule. Heat it to 165F and you'll be fine.
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
99818 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 4:32 pm to
It's the searing that gives me pause. If I had just tossed chicken in the cooker and left them for a few hours, no worries.


But partially cooking them and leaving them sit out for 3 hours, I've got a bit more hesitation. I've got them cooking on high now but was just curious anyone else's thoughts. I'd hate to get anybody sick.
This post was edited on 12/6/23 at 4:33 pm
Posted by lsuwins3
Member since Nov 2008
1789 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 5:40 pm to
My rule of thumb after having food poisoning: is it worth getting sick for the cost of that food. I’m guessing not.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
59964 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

Partially cooked chicken left at room temperature for 3 hours. I have some doubts man.


Yep.
Posted by saderade
America's City
Member since Jul 2005
26013 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 11:15 pm to
quote:

ut partially cooking them and leaving them sit out for 3 hours, I've got a bit more hesitation. I've got them cooking on high now but was just curious anyone else's thoughts. I'd hate to get anybody sick.
Why do you think this matters ? I would think searing them would help prevent bacteria growth vs leaving it out raw for hours.
Posted by Gaston
Dirty Coast
Member since Aug 2008
41212 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 12:04 am to
Yea, I’m with you…read that and thought the logic was backwards.
Posted by Sugarbaker
Peachtree
Member since Jun 2023
446 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 7:26 am to
The searing raised the internal temp. Things grow in warmer temps. They spent longer in “the danger zone” between 40-140 degrees as a result. Bacteria doubles something like every 20 minutes in that range.

I would be conflicted, too. Having had food poisoning, I would probably make dog food with them.
Posted by wesfau
Member since Mar 2023
1201 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 7:44 am to
quote:

I'd hate to get anybody sick.



Roll the dice if you're feeling lucky and only feeding yourself.

If you're serving others don't frick around with food poisoning. Throw that shite out.
Posted by armsdealer
Member since Feb 2016
11996 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 6:12 pm to
Food safety you have 4 hours in the danger zone, you are fine at 3 hours and people historically have left meat in the danger zone for much longer without issue.

Cooking to 165 isn't a cure all for bad food, if bacteria have grown and produced toxins the toxins will still make you sick even if you kill the bacteria. In this situation I don't think much if any would have grown.
Posted by Quatrepot
Member since Jun 2023
4154 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 6:14 pm to
Chicken is cheap. Throw that shite and start over
Posted by gumbo2176
Member since May 2018
18082 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 10:59 pm to
So, you're talking about less than $10 worth of ingredients.

Is it worth chancing getting sick over that little amount of money lost?

It will cost you way more than that trying to get well if you come down with food poisoning.

Posted by Degas
2187645493 posts
Member since Jul 2010
11765 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 12:29 am to
Rule of thumb, according to the FDA, food is safe for up to four hours between 40 degrees and 140 degrees. I know it's too late now, but to answer your question, at the time you discovered the chicken had been in the danger zone for three hours, you had one more hour to bring it up over 140, meaning if you switched on the crock pot at the three hour mark, the chicken may not reach an internal temp of 140 in under an hour and would therefore be in the danger zone for over four hours.
Posted by Nawlens Gator
louisiana
Member since Sep 2005
5912 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 12:41 am to


RU Nutz Cook it and eat it. Give some to your husband first, and if he dies, don't eat it.



first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram