re: CDC admits in FOIA that unvaccinated recovered COVID Patients Don’t Spread COVID

quote:

---

Well, technically it says they don't have the data

---

They have the data. If they could show reinfection it would be headlines.

The data is all there. They don’t want it.

quote:

---

Neither of them have ever been tested nor have went to see a doctor, so technically their cases are not on the books.

---

How do they know they had covid if they weren't tested? Could have been something else like flu.

You really don’t know if a person had it twice because the threshold for the pcr testing has changed from the beginning of the testing in March-April 2020 until End of January 2021.

At the beginning of the pandemic they were using a threshold of 40-45 amplifications. Remember, the more amplifications you do, the more likely the test will pick up back ground DNA fragments from other viruses or previous infection. In other words, this would yield more false positives.

The inventor of the pcr, Dr Kary Mullis, who shared the Nobel prize in Chemistry in 1993 said that

quote:

---

PCR tests are unable to distinguish between “the whole virus and viral fragments,” meaning that a so-called positive test, as mentioned in the CD paper, cannot determine if one is infected with the virus, but “merely indicates the presence of viral RNA molecules.”

---

[/quote]

In January 2021 on the day Biden “saluted the marines”, the WHO changed the amplification threshold to 37-40. However, Mullis and 22 other scientists who reviewed Mullis’ paper said

quote:

---

the article suggested anything under 30 to 35 cycles to indicate a positive.

---

Mullis said himself that in reality, anything over a threshold of 28 amplifications should be considered a false positive.

The reality is that we have no idea how many people truly have or had Covid using this flawed pcr test. Consequently, it’s impossible to know who is truly reinfected based solely on a positive pcr. Obviously, if a patient has symptoms and a positive pcr, this is more likely to be a sign of disease. It’s impossible to know how long that person will shed viral fragments. Hence, an asymptomatic, previously infected person with a positive pcr in the 37-40 is likely to be a false positive.

LINK

Boom

Correct. And, the vaccine push is to launder people finding out whether they’ve actually had it or not (one of tens of millions of false positives).

If people began to hear/find out that the numbers were grossly inflated, and not many, if at all got the fluhan virus, then the political assassination of this county’s small business and middle class is laid bare. The panic, lying and draconian measures are unpopular to almost everyone. If found out to be utter lies for political power grab, holy shite, dc And every politician will need divine intervention to avoid being drawn and quartered.

We have all the collective data required. It indicates that you need another insertion. It also has been found that you will need regular penetrations and that big pharma and scienze is the only path to overcoming this plague. We are from the government and we are here to help. Please everyone take your medicine so we can move on to fixing global warming and development of rainbow hair dye free of petroleum distillates.

quote:

---

Correct. And, the vaccine push is to launder people finding out whether they’ve actually had it or not (one of tens of millions of false positives).

If people began to hear/find out that the numbers were grossly inflated, and not many, if at all got the fluhan virus, then the political assassination of this county’s small business and middle class is laid bare. The panic, lying and draconian measures are unpopular to almost everyone. If found out to be utter lies for political power grab, holy shite, dc And every politician will need divine intervention to avoid being drawn and quartered.

---

Exactly right. The flimsy PCR test results are the smoking gun that they’re desperate to cover up.