- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/14/21 at 10:42 pm to Nematocyst
Lol you’re a known alter and propagandist. Nothing you say is true.
This post was edited on 9/14/21 at 10:44 pm
Posted on 9/14/21 at 10:55 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
No wonder he didn’t provide a link.
He did provide a link, to be fair. The problem was that the link revealed that he’d either seriously misinterpreted the results, or he’d misrepresented them to drive a specific narrative.
As for the bizarre equation “19/22 = 1.00”, I won’t even speculate on how that figure was derived. All I can say with certainty is that it’s a simple calculation that’s obviously incorrect on its face, but even extrapolating these specific results to the point of absurdity does not provide one any means whatsoever to justify the claim that 100% of the children in this study demonstrated clear evidence of endothelial injury … much less that the same conclusion could be applicable to pediatric COVID cases across the board.
I agree that there’s far too much speculation, unfounded generalization, editorializing, and even outright manipulation that’s been allowed to propagate throughout scientific research and so-called science reporting. It does engender suspicion and distrust, and rightly so. Empirical fact is foundational; your feelings about those facts are merely a possible side effect that, if they’re going to be discussed at all, have to be restrained to the proper context.
Perhaps the most frustrating part for me personally, though, is that there’s an abundance of shoddy research and questionable logic being touted on every available platform, but only one side ever gets called out or actively censored for it — regardless of whether it’s actually flawed or not. Hell, sometimes it’s arguably superior in quality, but it’ll be suppressed purely out of spite. Meanwhile the side that supports the proper narrative can freely disseminate any thinly-veiled propaganda piece they may have mined for talking points on a given day and get automatic marquee feature status on every major platform.
Posted on 9/14/21 at 11:10 pm to Madking
quote:
Lol you’re a known alter and propagandist. Nothing you say is true.
What cause am I promoting, calling liars out for being liars?
Posted on 9/15/21 at 4:03 am to mouton
quote:
You are an absolutely fricking disgusting human being. It’s sad you get to hide in anonymity like a coward.
You are an absolutely fricking disgusting human being. You want to suppress the truth about a young person who got the social experiment injection dropping dead of a heart attack so that you can continue the evil agenda of manipulating even more people into thinking the injection is safe.
This post was edited on 9/15/21 at 6:44 am
Posted on 9/15/21 at 4:06 am to mouton
Why are people downvoting this? It’s the truth
Posted on 9/15/21 at 4:18 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
I RA’d his post (a good while back no less). It was a classless thing to post imho (even if they know it to be true...it is still classless.
Considering that universities are still hellbent on forcing everyone to get the injection, it’s evil af to suppress a story that would give the public vital information that could save the lives of others. All these people suffering with myocarditis are saying they wouldn’t have gotten the injection had they known this was a growing risk.
Call me classless all you want... I’m on the right side of history and rather save lives by informing others of the truth instead of accusing others of being classless and shaming them to be silent about hard truths!
Posted on 9/15/21 at 4:36 am to yallallcrazy
quote:
the vaccine has problems but it’s better than the alternative.
You're assuming there is only one alternative? Yay science
Posted on 9/15/21 at 4:51 am to Madking
quote:not a chance. Anything negative to the vaccine gets silenced
If the myocarditis was caused by Covid it would be plastered all over the news
Posted on 9/15/21 at 5:40 am to BigB123
quote:not a viable option since the ‘not a vaccine’ doesn’t prevent catching or transmitting the Fauci Flu. The bio weapon is here to stay
not get covid
This post was edited on 9/15/21 at 5:41 am
Posted on 9/15/21 at 6:01 am to LSUAngelHere1
quote:
Call me classless all you want
Okay
quote:
I’m on the right side of history and rather save lives by informing others of the TRUTH
I have no issue with true information being spread.
However, until we KNOW that the young lady died as a result of the vaccine, it is simply speculation. As such, it is unacceptable to spread that information. The Faulk family deserves to be treated with respect.
FWIW - I am 100% against mandates and coercion to get the jab. If indeed it is true, then I feel that her death is 100% attributed to JBE and President CRT. Just my .02.
Posted on 9/15/21 at 6:49 am to Roaad
quote:The crap paper in the OP was posted about a week ago. It has not been peer reviewed and is based on data from VAERS, which is not a reliable source of data for studies.
Myocarditis rates among teen and young adult male, who take Pfizer/Moderna
The numbers for myocarditis they get from their calculations are wildly off from numbers in documented trials.
Posted on 9/15/21 at 6:49 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
I have no issue with true information being spread.
Liar. You literally just said it’s a classless thing to do even if they know it to be true.
quote::
RA’d his post (a good while back no less). It was a classless thing to post imho (even if they know it to be true...it is still classless.
This post was edited on 9/15/21 at 7:02 am
Posted on 9/15/21 at 6:50 am to Strannix
quote:Like you actually care when people assume You have two of your “team members” assuming the death of a beloved member of this communities daughters because it makes them feel “right”
You're assuming there is only one alternative? Yay science
The truth is when a young person dies of sudden cardiac arrest the most likely cause is hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, which is a congenital issue that has nothing to do with myocarditis
Dilated cardiomyopathy, which is caused by myocarditis, is the least likely cause of death here. Myocarditis in a young person while extremely uncommon, is even more uncommon to cause severe events. It’s extremely treatable
Both sides of this issues have been pieces of shite. The liberals that introduced covid myocarditis fear porn and now this board using vaccine myocarditis fear porn
Both sides are filth. The truth is myocarditis itself is extremely rare from both, and severe myocarditis is almost unheard of from both
Posted on 9/15/21 at 6:51 am to Strannix
quote:
assuming there is only one alternative
Nowhere did I say that. You can find me on here saying quite the opposite.
Posted on 9/15/21 at 6:52 am to LSUAngelHere1
quote:The study in the OP is equivalent to a blog post as far as credibility goes.
Considering that universities are still hellbent on forcing everyone to get the injection, it’s evil af to suppress a story that would give the public vital information that could save the lives of others. All these people suffering with myocarditis are saying they wouldn’t have gotten the injection had they known this was a growing risk.
Posted on 9/15/21 at 6:54 am to mmcgrath
I’m sure that will comfort the parents of the adolescent males who had almost zero risk for serious complications from Covid and now have myocarditis. Perhaps you could write it out on a Hallmark card.
Posted on 9/15/21 at 6:56 am to the808bass
quote:Well oddly enough they did have a higher risk of myocarditis itself from the virus(albeit very low)
I’m sure that will comfort the parents of the adolescent males who had almost zero risk for serious complications from Covid and now have myocarditis.
Myocarditis is a retard bat signal that was first used by liberals and the BIG 10 and now it’s being used by anti-vaxxers
This post was edited on 9/15/21 at 6:57 am
Posted on 9/15/21 at 6:59 am to LSUAngelHere1
quote:
You want to suppress the truth about a young person who got the social experiment injection dropping dead of a heart attack
What evidence is there of this? Just because for some sick reason you want it to be true does not make it so.
Posted on 9/15/21 at 7:01 am to the808bass
quote:As I am sure pointing out the risks of getting hit by a meteorite would be of little consolation, but a bogus report overstating risks of being hit by meteorites as some sort of fear porn is still a bogus report.
I’m sure that will comfort the parents of the adolescent males who had almost zero risk for serious complications from Covid and now have myocarditis. Perhaps you could write it out on a Hallmark card.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News