Started By
Message

re: Democratic voters walk through the streets chanting "defund the police"

Posted on 6/28/21 at 1:56 pm to
Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
20358 posts
Posted on 6/28/21 at 1:56 pm to
Your whore VP sure does like to pay for bail for their criminal constituents
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
11593 posts
Posted on 6/28/21 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

There are full on socialist Democrats and a borderline corporate wing of the Democratic Party that doesn’t agree with them at all. Surely even you can see that.


It doesn't matter if you agree with them or not, what matters is how close you stand next to them. Duck and run.
Posted by WhiskeyThrottle
Weatherford Tx
Member since Nov 2017
5432 posts
Posted on 6/28/21 at 1:59 pm to
De Blasio just stated he is going to flood problematic areas with police to stop crime again.

Portland is an utter shithole.

Crime is surging in California.

The list goes on and on and on. But there is one glaringly obvious commonality all of these cities have.

Defunding the police is one of the most immediately consequential decisions the government can face. I never thought liberals were intelligent, but I am constantly amazed at how their stupidity never finds rock bottom.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73559 posts
Posted on 6/28/21 at 1:59 pm to
This is all the Turnip in chief talked about.

President Joe Biden announced a plan to curb gun crimes and crack down on firearms dealers amid a nationwide spike in violent crime that poses a political challenge for the White House.

The strategy would allow states and municipalities to tap into pandemic relief funds to hire police officers under certain circumstances, Biden said on Wednesday, providing resources to combat an increase in shootings, armed robberies and assaults.

The president also said he’ll pursue other measures -- some through executive action -- such as “zero tolerance” rules for gun dealers, expanding summer employment programs for teenagers and helping people released from prison find jobs.

“We have the opportunity to come together now, as Democrats and Republicans, as fellow Americans, to fulfill the first responsibility of a government in a democracy: to keep each other safe,” Biden said at the White House. “Enough.”

The plan that the president discussed on Wednesday has five pillars.

Stem the flow of firearms, including by enacting a zero-tolerance program for gun dealers who “willfully violate the law” and launching teams to slow the trafficking of guns between cities
Bolster funding for law enforcement, including by directing the Treasury Department to allow communities experiencing a surge in gun violence to use their money from the American Rescue Plan’s $350 billion state and local government funding to hire law enforcement officials or pay overtime for community policing strategies
Launch a task force of 14 cities to support community violence intervention programs, which could also tap into Covid aid funds
Expand summer programs and job availability for teens and young adults
Do more to help people released from prison get jobs

Biden had hoped for a deal on a police reform bill by late May. Senator Tim Scott, the South Carolina Republican who has been heavily involved in the talks, said he thinks it’s “June or bust” to get an agreement.

Psaki said Biden can move to quell crime without roiling the police reform talks. “Communities across the country who advocate and support police reform, they don’t see it as a mutually exclusive issue; neither does the president,” she said.

(Everytown for Gun Safety, which advocates for universal background checks and gun-safety measures, is backed by Michael Bloomberg, founder and majority owner of Bloomberg News parent company Bloomberg LP.) LINK
Posted by TDsngumbo
Alpha Silverfox
Member since Oct 2011
41930 posts
Posted on 6/28/21 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

You’re reading comprehension is not great, is it?

There are full on socialist Democrats and a borderline corporate wing of the Democratic Party that doesn’t agree with them at all. Surely even you can see that.

Well while we're at it then, not voting for additional funding for police is not the same thing as DEfunding police.

Democrats are playing politics with that funding bill which is why republicans don't support it AND YOU KNOW THAT.

You also know damn fricking well that republicans do not want to defund any police.
Posted by Nurbis
Member since May 2020
1362 posts
Posted on 6/28/21 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

He doesn’t have handlers


"I'll take your questions. And as usual, folks, they gave me a list of the people I'm going to call on," Biden said to reporters.

So if Biden doesn't have handlers, then who is "they" that gives him his list of who to call on?
Posted by LSUinMA
Commerce, Texas
Member since Nov 2008
4778 posts
Posted on 6/28/21 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

Democrats are playing politics with that funding bill which is why republicans don't support it AND YOU KNOW THAT


The Republicans don’t support the bill because they can’t be seen to be cooperating with the other party or they will be primaried.

If this was 25 years ago and Bill Clinton signed off on something that Republicans say that they want, like he did with welfare reform, they could vote for it on the merits. They can’t now, because the tribalism is so out of control that the other party is literally characterized as the enemy of the people.

There’s no nuance, there’s no recognition that there’s not a monolithic voting block in the party, there is only hyperbole, exaggeration and outright lying.

Republicans used to be about sensible, efficient government that served the needs of the people and otherwise stayed out of the way, but that’s not what this bunch of clowns is about.

The Democrats aren’t much better, if at all, given the left-wing lunacy that is more talk than action. Thankfully, those people have not yet gained control of the party. I guess it’s coming though, especially when endangered moderates are lumped in with the rest of them by geniuses like you.

I won’t say that “you know that” or that you would even admit it if you did.
Posted by 88Wildcat
Topeka, Ks
Member since Jul 2017
14074 posts
Posted on 6/28/21 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

1. His handlers don’t, not doesn’t. Maybe you should get basic grammar down before tackling public policy?

2. Handlers? Read a few books. Biden shoots his mouth off and has been a notoriously lacking in discipline candidate ever since he first ran for president in 1988. He doesn’t have handlers. That’s a tired narrative. If he had handlers, maybe he wouldn’t say stupid shite like he did the other day about the infrastructure bill.

3. He doesn’t support defunding the police. Again, there was $350 billion for law-enforcement in a bill that passed with no Republican votes.



He has handlers (and it is definitely plural). He just doesn't remember he has handlers which is why he has to walk back every actual true thing he says and replace it with bull shite that no one really believes.

He doesn't support defunding the police the same way he doesn't support banning fracking, doesn't support doing away with the filibuster, and doesn't support tying the bipartisan infrastructure bill to the highly partison Democrat human infrastructure bill. Meaning he says he doesn't support these things but he will cave in like a Chilean coal mine to the leftists pulling his strings and running the Democrat party the first time they so much as breathe on him.
Posted by SpotCheckBilly
Member since May 2020
6648 posts
Posted on 6/28/21 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

2. Handlers? Read a few books. Biden shoots his mouth off and has been a notoriously lacking in discipline candidate ever since he first ran for president in 1988. He doesn’t have handlers. That’s a tired narrative. If he had handlers, maybe he wouldn’t say stupid shite like he did the other day about the infrastructure bill.




Thanks, I needed a laugh. Apparently, you need handlers.
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
45273 posts
Posted on 6/28/21 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

The Republicans don’t support the bill because they can’t be seen to be cooperating with the other party or they will be primaried.


The bill isn't supported because the democrats keep trying to sneak their fricking retarded pet projects in it, just like they do with every bill.
Posted by Torqued Pork
Malvern
Member since Sep 2020
3768 posts
Posted on 6/28/21 at 3:11 pm to
Biden doesn't dare criticize Soros for funding prosecutors who don't prosecute or the no bail crap that lets perps out as soon as they're booked.
Posted by LSUinMA
Commerce, Texas
Member since Nov 2008
4778 posts
Posted on 6/28/21 at 3:12 pm to
I wonder if you know that’s not true and you’re just that cynical, or if you are actually that deluded?

With margins like this, there can’t be anything in a non-reconciliation bill that both sides don’t agree on.
Posted by PaperTiger
Ruston, LA
Member since Feb 2015
23086 posts
Posted on 6/28/21 at 3:14 pm to
Hard to know whats going on in the real world when you are looking down on it from your high horse.
Posted by LSUinMA
Commerce, Texas
Member since Nov 2008
4778 posts
Posted on 6/28/21 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

Biden doesn't dare criticize Soros for funding prosecutors who don't prosecute or the no bail crap that lets perps out as soon as they're booked


And this, my friend, it’s just bat shite crazy.

There’s always some bogeyman just around the corner who’s pulling the strings whether it’s Soros or Bill Gates or Warren Buffett or John F. Kennedy Junior disguised as a homeless person. This is why it’s pointless to try to have any actual substantive debate here. It’s a lunatic asylum.
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
45273 posts
Posted on 6/28/21 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

I wonder if you know that’s not true and you’re just that cynical, or if you are actually that deluded?

With margins like this, there can’t be anything in a non-reconciliation bill that both sides don’t agree on.


You mean like when they snuck the millions of dollars to Pakistan for "gender equity" in the so called American Families Plan?

Gender equity in third world middle eastern shitholes has nothing to do with American families. That is a democrat pet project sneaking into a bill.
This post was edited on 6/28/21 at 3:24 pm
Posted by LSUinMA
Commerce, Texas
Member since Nov 2008
4778 posts
Posted on 6/28/21 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

You mean like when they snuck the millions of dollars to Pakistan for "gender equity" in the so called American Families Plan?


Yeah, exactly like that genius, because that’s a reconciliation bill. Seek remedial education.
Posted by Friscodog
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2009
4494 posts
Posted on 6/28/21 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

The far left people can say whatever they want, and the folks on this board can insist that all Democrats are the same, but the fact is that the president does not support defunding the police.


But everyone else in his party does support it.. The POTUS has to bend the knee to his voters.
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
19374 posts
Posted on 6/28/21 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

The Democrats aren’t much better, if at all, given the left-wing lunacy that is more talk than action. Thankfully, those people have not yet gained control of the party. I guess it’s coming though, especially when endangered moderates are lumped in with the rest of them by geniuses like you.

So why are you on here attacking Republicans? Did you go at the Democrats with the same fervor when they filibustered Tim Scott's police reform bill as there were riots in several major cities over police reform and defending the police? Only then to turn around and call the filibuster a "relic of the Jim Crow era"...
Posted by Bandit1980
God's Country
Member since Nov 2019
3812 posts
Posted on 6/28/21 at 3:48 pm to
And he came flat out and said this when?

Please supply that info.
Posted by Scream4LSU
Member since Sep 2007
991 posts
Posted on 6/28/21 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

There was $350 billion for law-enforcement in the bill that was passed with no Republican votes.


No it didn't. There was no specific funding with the words law enforcement or police. It was a general slush fund that could possibly be used for police at the discretion of local leadership which Republicans knew was a false flag that would never get used in that way.
This post was edited on 6/28/21 at 4:05 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram